Kaito is quite satisfactory this time, with overall earnings exceeding 50,000 USDT, including NFT, $KAITO, and airdrops from collaborative projects. Although the Yap exchange rate was not as expected, considering the ambush period was only 2 months and the only cost was time, there’s really nothing to complain about regarding the return on investment.
After the Kaito airdrop, many people thought the show was over. However, that is not the case; the official team allocated a portion of chips to collaborative projects to incentivize users on the Yapper Leaderboard and Yapper Launchpad.
The official team clearly stated that they will collaborate with relevant teams to distribute rewards, ensuring that these rewards are clearly allocated to the end users. This means that if you have participated in voting or have a name on the project leaderboard, you will soon receive this portion of the airdrop.
Additionally, Kaito has reserved 7.5% for long-term creator incentives. In the description of this portion, the official team dropped a hint: initially on X, eventually on other platforms. This suggests that the Kaito team is developing new products based on existing resources and data.
Reflecting on Kaito's operations, I am most satisfied with three points:
I was confident from the start that it was a certain opportunity for 2025, and I continued to engage (a bit regrettable for being lazy during the Spring Festival).
I estimated that the floor price of the Genesis NFT would break 10 ETH, and before the snapshot, the earnings were 100x. I decisively took profits and did not try to catch the last bit (many previous projects with a similar mindset ended up losing badly).
- I predicted that collaborative projects would airdrop to leaderboard users, focusing on projects that were in the top 100 on the leaderboard (the @StoryProtocol was named on the full cycle leaderboard but received no airdrop, and I still don’t know how it failed, which is the biggest regret).
So the question arises: With more and more projects on Kaito, which one has the best cost-performance ratio?
My reference dimensions mainly include three aspects: project fundamentals, whether the team members are active, and how competitive the leaderboard is.
Based on the above considerations, I bet that @initia is a certain opportunity, partly from public information and partly from personal observation, which constitutes 100% of my reference opinion:
- A hot project from the Binance ecosystem that has not yet issued tokens.
Initia has raised a total of 24 million USD, with well-known institutions like Binance and Hack VC participating, along with many star project founders. The TGE is expected in March, and we don’t have much time left; market expectations are very high.
The official testnet activities have long ended, and there aren’t particularly good angles for participation now. Besides rolling in DC, brushing the Kaito leaderboard might be the most cost-effective option.
- The Initia team is obsessed with Kaito.
Before launching on Kaito, Initia's official Twitter and founders @ItsAlwaysZonny and @sinitias were already showing interest in Kaito. Later, when Initia launched on Kaito, the team and community members became increasingly engaged on Yap.
From this perspective, the Initia team places great importance on Kaito and values the Yappers on the leaderboard. When the TGE occurs, it is highly likely that they will allocate a portion of airdrops to Yappers.
- The Initia leaderboard is not that competitive.
Before Initia launched on Kaito, I had published two tweets, and I didn’t intentionally brush afterward. Although many people have been brushing recently, I still remain in the Top 100 of the 30D, 3M, 6M, and 12M leaderboards.
This shows that compared to top projects like @monad_xyz and @EclipseFND, the Initia leaderboard is not as competitive as imagined.
Regarding how to engage with project leaderboards, here are some experiences I’ve summarized from practice that will definitely be useful to you:
- Original content > Pseudo-original content.
On the surface, many people have been writing about Initia recently, creating a competitive atmosphere. In fact, most tweets are generated by AI or pieced together, trying to pass off as original.
What I want to say is that AI is not stupid; it can easily check for content duplication, and content with high originality has significantly higher weight than pseudo-original content. So, output more of your genuine thoughts and don’t always think about taking shortcuts.
- Expand on ecosystem projects.
The Initia testing activities have ended, and many people complain about not having good angles for output, writing the same things over and over.
My suggestion is to pay more attention to ecosystem projects because the Initia ecosystem is gaining momentum. Some projects have already raised funds, and some are actively working, which can provide you with early participation opportunities and a continuous stream of creative material. Remember to tag Initia when you tweet, and here are two tweets you can reference:
One is @GXingPing's follow-up on the ecosystem project @infinityg_ai, which recently announced completing a $2 million seed round and is building the first proxy IDE, allowing creators to start building AI applications without coding: https://x.com/GXingPing/status/1892769940257853483
The other is @WYmask's tutorial on the @zaargg testnet, which generally attracts a lot of traffic and is easy to rank: https://x.com/WY_mask/status/1893313828936654912
Through these two examples, doesn’t it open up your thinking?
- Value effective interaction.
In Kaito's algorithm system, effective interaction carries a high weight.
Even if you don’t like socializing, try to interact more with the official Twitter and team members. Once you gain their attention or replies, it will help your ranking and points.
Additionally, interact more with the teachers on the Initia Mindshare leaderboard, focusing on exchanging ideas, and be careful not to become a nuisance; otherwise, it may backfire.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
