On November 5th, an announcement in the European asset management circle, which seemed to be a "technological upgrade," essentially pushed the boundaries of regulation and platforms onto the public blockchain: Amundi, regarded as one of the leading asset management institutions in Europe, collaborated with CACEIS, a financial services and custody institution aimed at asset management and institutional clients, to launch the first tokenized share of the money market fund AMUNDI FUNDS CASH EUR on the Ethereum public blockchain—“AMUNDI FUNDS CASH EUR - J28 EUR DLT” (it remains uncertain whether the official full name includes “(C)”). This is not a newly issued on-chain token, but rather a movement of traditional money market fund shares, originally operated under the existing fund regulatory and compliance framework, onto a distributed ledger for registration and circulation to enhance the traceability of transaction records. More crucially, Amundi designed it as a hybrid distribution model: traditional subscription channels continue to exist while tokenized shares appear concurrently on the public chain, essentially touching the gray area of on-chain accounting and on-chain distribution under the same regulatory shell, forcing sales channels, custodians, and even platform parties to rethink—when fund shares can be accurately recorded and circulated on Ethereum, who is the “selling end” in a compliance sense, and must the regulatory definition of cross-platform and cross-border be adjusted accordingly.

Asset Management Giants Join Hands with CACEIS to Test the Waters on Chain

In this foray, the role division was deliberately designed to be very “compliant”: Amundi positioned itself in its most familiar role—large asset management firm in France, a top institution in the European asset management circle, responsible for the investment decisions and overall product structure of the original money market fund AMUNDI FUNDS CASH EUR, without altering the regulatory identity of the fund itself; CACEIS continued its role in financial services and custody for asset management and institutional clients, extending the back-end processes of custody, registration, and clearing, which originally occurred in a closed system, to the distributed ledger technology level on the Ethereum public blockchain. For regulators and peers, this move does not represent two institutions “starting anew” with a new entity, but rather transferring the accounting carrier from centralized databases to the chain within the existing asset management - custody division.

The real experimental significance lies in the somewhat awkwardly named new share category—“AMUNDI FUNDS CASH EUR - J28 EUR DLT.” The official positioning is very clear: it is a tokenized share category of the existing money market fund, belonging to different technical forms of the same fund, rather than a new product. What investors purchase remains the money market fund shares constrained by the current fund regulatory and compliance framework, with unchanged rights and obligations from a legal and tax perspective, but the holdings and transactions are recorded in the DLT ledger on the Ethereum public blockchain, aiming to enhance traceability and connect to future tokenized services. In other words, J28 EUR DLT is innovating in the “form of registration” rather than redrawing the risk profile: Amundi continues to manage assets within the regulatory shell, while CACEIS is responsible for moving the shares of this shell onto the chain, and the market and regulators have to adapt to the new reality that the same regulated fund now has two parallel technical forms existing on-chain and off-chain.

Tokenization Experiment within the Fund Regulatory Framework

From a regulatory perspective, J28 EUR DLT was deliberately placed within the existing fund regulatory shell rather than packaged as a type of “new asset.” The official announcement defines this move as part of Amundi's asset tokenization strategy, with the underlying still corresponding to the cash euro money market fund combination of AMUNDI FUNDS CASH EUR, without any description of “escaping fund regulations.” The briefing did not include any specific exemptions or additional approvals, which signals to regulators and peers: legally, it remains a product subject to the current fund and asset management rules, merely that the share registration has migrated from the traditional custody system to the DLT ledger on Ethereum. The rights enjoyed by investors and the obligations they bear are still defined according to the ordinary fund holder role; the on-chain form alters the mode of registration and circulation, rather than the contractual relationship and risk attributes.

This is particularly clear in the hybrid distribution model. J28 EUR DLT does not open up a completely on-chain, self-service world but allows investors to continue participating through traditional subscription, redemption, and reporting systems, interfacing with familiar sales channels, distribution agencies, and custodians. Compliance processes such as identity verification, anti-money laundering checks, transaction and holding reports can still reasonably be inferred to be borne by these traditional intermediaries rather than handed off to anonymous wallets or automated smart contracts. The on-chain registration is more like a technical upgrade of the back-end infrastructure: custodian CACEIS uses the public chain to enhance the traceability of share records but does not shake the core boundary of "qualified intermediaries holding customer information, performing KYC and AML, and reporting data to regulatory and tax authorities." Under the current European trend of asset tokenization, this approach of locking technical innovation within the existing regulatory framework is becoming the default path for large institutions to probe industry rules.

New Boundaries for Platforms and Users under Hybrid Distribution Models

With this "J28 EUR DLT" share, Amundi and CACEIS have chosen a typical hybrid distribution path: the front end remains the familiar fund sales and custody system, with an additional layer of Ethereum ledger in the back end. For sales platforms and custodians, functions are not replaced by the on-chain structure but are redivided—subscriptions, redemptions, client suitability assessments, information disclosures, and fund settlements still occur within regulated channels, led by traditional asset managers and service institutions; the tokenized registration on Ethereum is more like a “public branch” of the custody system, responsible for recording share changes and providing additional, tamper-proof timestamps and transaction trails for internal reconciliation and proof materials to regulatory and tax authorities. This arrangement allows the platform to maintain the advantage of a “single entry and exit” while opening part of the accounting and tracking capabilities to the public chain, forming a new division of labor with "sales in the front, registration on the chain."

For users, on-chain share records do not automatically equate to a free on-chain trading experience. Existing materials do not specify whether holders are allowed to directly transfer “J28 EUR DLT” on Ethereum in a peer-to-peer manner, which means that actual share circulation is likely still locked within regulated platforms and custody networks: users wanting to change holdings, exit investments, or assert rights must still initiate instructions through Amundi or CACEIS and their authorized channels, rather than transferring tokens between wallets. The direct impact of on-chain records is more reflected in compliance—every subscription, redemption, or share adjustment creates a publicly verifiable on-chain trace, enhancing the traceability of transactions, but firmly keeping risk assessment, customer protection, and dispute resolution within the contract relationships and regulatory processes off-chain. The boundaries drawn by the hybrid model ultimately hand over “recording and technical proof” to the public chain infrastructure while firmly keeping “decision-making, control, and legal responsibilities” in the hands of the regulated platform.

Compliance Pressure Test on the Ethereum Public Chain

Choosing Ethereum as a mainstream public chain, rather than merely conducting a “local network experiment” within the custodial institution's own system or permissioned chain, itself is a pressure test on the publicness of data and the bottom line of privacy regulation. The official clearly states "distributed ledger technology on the Ethereum public chain," while deliberately allowing only share records to go on-chain, retaining investor identities and risk assessments within the offline regulated system, which effectively showcases a new line of technological division of labor to regulators: the technical facts of transactions and holdings can be fully public, while subject information and contractual relationships are still protected and constrained by existing rules. This design inevitably touches upon regulatory disputes regarding cross-border data flows and whether information on-chain is considered “personally related data,” yet it also provides regulators with a realistic sample—without changing the legal attributes of the fund, public chain transparency can be embedded within the existing compliance framework.

In an environment like Ethereum, where transaction histories are permanently public and nodes are distributed across jurisdictions, regulators can, for the first time, use “traceability” as a lever for assessing compliance, rather than resorting to custodial reports and platform self-claims afterwards. Every purchase, redemption, and holding change of tokenized shares creates a continuous record on the chain, providing audit, tax, and cross-border sales compliance checks with a parallel evidence source to traditional reports. The briefing did not mention any specific exemptions or extra approvals, implying that this experiment is treated as an ordinary fund product directly accessing the public chain ledger under current rules. For other asset management and custody institutions, the importance of this case does not lie in technical details, but rather in providing a replicable compliance narrative: as long as responsibilities and controls remain with the regulated platform while share records are handed over to the public chain, it is possible to issue regulated financial products on the open chain without rewriting regulatory laws.

Regulatory Game After Tokenized Funds

Completing this on-chain experiment within the existing fund rules, Amundi and CACEIS provide the asset management industry with a template on “how to touch the public chain without changing the law”: choosing the money market fund, characterized by low risk and clear cash management attributes, as a breakthrough, maintaining traditional control in the custody and distribution system while only migrating share records to the Ethereum ledger, allowing regulators to continue using familiar product classifications and risk frameworks. For other asset management institutions and custodians, this is both encouragement and pressure—some will likely try to replicate under similar hybrid distribution models and technical paths, testing the boundaries of their tolerance with regulators on public chains; others may choose to wait, to see more public product details and explicit feedback from regulators on subsequent projects before deciding whether to follow suit. Meanwhile, distribution platforms need to recalculate costs between “gaining liquidity and transparency from on-chain records” and “bearing additional technical and compliance responsibilities.” The real game is yet to come: how tax treatment will determine the holding and transfer of tokenized shares, whether on-chain records of cross-border sales trigger new licensing requirements, and how responsibilities are divided among custodians, public chain developers, and issuers during infrastructure failures or attacks—these questions currently remain unanswered in the briefing, indicating that tokenized funds are merely a preliminary confrontation in the long-term negotiations between regulation and the industry regarding public chain assets.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。