Author: EX
Franklin $1.5 trillion asset management CIO says "prices are decoupled from fundamentals." In the same week, BlackRock joined a tokenization alliance of 54 institutions in the UK, Robinhood's chain surged into the top five DEXs, Hyundai settled cross-border trade with USDT, and Bolivia is preparing to include USDT in its national payment system. While BTC struggles at $62K, infrastructure is experiencing a quiet bull market. The question is not "Will BTC drop again?" but "When the infrastructure is completed, who will own the toll booths?"
1. Seven Signals, Happening in the Same Week
In the second week of July 2026, the crypto market received seven seemingly unrelated, but directionally aligned signals:
1. Franklin Templeton CIO: Prices and fundamentals "decoupled"
On July 13, Franklin Templeton's CIO for crypto business, Seth Ginns, clearly stated in an interview with CoinDesk: "There’s a big disconnect between where prices are and real fundamentals.”
This is not a crypto KOL making a call. Franklin Templeton manages $1.5 trillion in assets, and Ginns directly manages the portfolio of Franklin Crypto. When he chooses to openly state this during a time of panic in the market at BTC $62K, the timing of his public expression deserves attention. As for Franklin's position changes, the Q3 13F disclosures will provide answers.
He mentioned several key signals: - Robinhood's blockchain plan proves that traditional financial distribution is migrating to crypto - Tokenized money market funds allow investors to earn on-chain returns - The revenue-driven token buyback model of DeFi protocols is making fundamental investors pay attention to tokenomics
2. UK Government Tokenization Alliance: BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan simultaneously join
On the same day, the UK Treasury-supported Tokenization Taskforce officially announced a list of 54 members. This is not a proof-of-concept sandbox — it comes with a 2-year roadmap: putting repo, gilts, and funds on-chain. The report also listed Ripple as a "fusion model," targeting a £44 billion annual output by 2035.
The list includes the world's largest asset management firms, top investment banks, and core operators of UK financial infrastructure. When BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley all appear on a government tokenization roadmap, it is no longer a "crypto narrative" — it is an upgrade plan for traditional financial infrastructure.
3. Robinhood Chain: Born for stock tokenization, dominated by meme coins
Less than two weeks after launching its blockchain, Robinhood has surged into the top five in DEX trading volume (confirmed by Bernstein), with TVL breaking $135 million, attracting 800,000 addresses. While the current activity involves meme coins rather than tokenized stocks, the infrastructure is already in place — the 23 million Robinhood user base is unmatched by any crypto-native DEX.
4. Hyundai uses USDT for real trade settlement
South Korea's Hyundai has completed a pilot for the use of USDT stablecoin in cross-border trade between the U.S. and Mexico. This is not a POC statement — it is a global manufacturing giant replacing traditional cross-border banking channels with stablecoins.
Hyundai's annual revenue exceeds $200 billion. If this pilot expands to its global supply chain, it will change the infrastructure landscape of global trade settlement.
5. Bolivia considers including USDT in the national payment system
Faced with a dollar shortage, the central bank of Bolivia is considering formally including Tether's USDT in the national payment system. The annual transaction volume has reached $430 million. This is a typical case of a developing country replacing dollar liquidity with stablecoins — continuing El Salvador's national cryptocurrency path but more directly on the practicality level.
6. BTC ETF ends eight weeks of continuous outflows
After eight weeks of sustained outflows, BTC ETF recorded a net inflow of $197 million last week. This is not a small number — but it comes in the context of BTC price testing $62K, escalating military conflict in the Middle East, and the return of Fed rate hike expectations. Funds chose crypto exposure in a "risk-off" environment.
7. SBI fully pivots to Solana + Yen stablecoin
Japanese financial giant SBI Holdings has pivoted its entire blockchain strategy to Solana, including tokenization issuance and yen stablecoin plans, and has teamed with Lawson convenience stores for a retail payments pilot. This is the "first shot" for Asian institutions deploying stablecoins in real-world payment scenarios.
2. The Essence of Major Divergence: "Price Narrative" Cannot Outperform "Infrastructure Narrative"
For the past decade, the core narrative of the crypto market has been about "price": when it will rise, how much it will rise, when to sell. This narrative framework makes BTC's price volatility a proxy variable for the entire industry’s "confidence index."
But 2026 is witnessing a fundamental change: infrastructure development is no longer reliant on BTC prices.
•Franklin Templeton launched a tokenized fund without waiting for BTC to return to $100K
•BlackRock joined the UK Tokenization Taskforce without waiting for market sentiment to improve
•Hyundai tested USDT for cross-border settlement without waiting for the SEC to clarify the regulatory framework
•SBI deployed tokenization on Solana without waiting for yen depreciation pressures to ease
The decision-making clock for these actions is a structural market change of 5-10 years, rather than a 3-6 month BTC price cycle. This is the core of the "major divergence": the decision frequency of leading indicators for infrastructure is not in the same time dimension as the volatility frequency of lagging indicators for price.
In the words of Franklin CIO: the current depth of institutional participation is "years strongest." But price has not reflected this — because price is still driven by retail sentiment and macro liquidity, while infrastructure is driven by institutional strategy and regulatory roadmap.
3. This is Not a "Valuation Correction" Story for Cryptocurrency
The common interpretative framework in the market is: "fundamentals are strong, price will eventually catch up." This is an overly simplified and dangerous conclusion.
What truly deserves attention is not "Will the price correct?", but "When the infrastructure is completed, who will charge for the use of these infrastructures?"
The characteristics of the current round of infrastructure are:
1. Shifting from "decentralization" to "upgrading traditional infrastructure": The goal of the UK Taskforce is not to create new DeFi protocols, but to enable repo, gilts, and funds to operate on the blockchain. This means the blockchain is becoming a "second-layer operating system" for financial infrastructure, rather than a replacement.
2. Permissioned chains and public chains coexist: The tokenization alliance of 54 institutions cannot operate on a permissionless public chain. The more likely scenario is: the permissioned chain is responsible for compliant clearing, while the public chain handles circulation and programmability. This suggests that the mid-layer of infrastructure — compliance bridging, custody, KYC/AML — becomes the key positioning point.
3. Sovereign nations and entities are entering faster than expected: Bolivia's national payment system, Hyundai's trade settlement, SBI's retail payments — these are not "crypto natives" stories. They stem from the real world’s demand for more efficient financial pipelines, and crypto just happens to provide the technological solution.
4. Stablecoins evolve from "transaction tools" to "real economy pipelines": Hyundai's cross-border settlement is not speculating with USDT, but replacing SWIFT with it. Bolivia is not using USDT for DeFi, but replacing dollar cash with it. This fundamentally changes the TAM (Total Addressable Market) of stablecoins.
4. History Does Not Repeat, but It Rhymes: Three Endings of "Price-Infrastructure Divergence"
If the "major divergence" of 2026 feels unfamiliar, history has its echoes. In the past 25 years, there have been at least three cycles similar to the current height — each time, the collapse of prices masked the accelerated construction of infrastructure. And each time, the victory of infrastructure occurred 12-24 months after prices hit bottom.
📉 Cycle One: 2000-2002 Internet Bubble → Birth of AWS
What happened: The Nasdaq fell from 5,048 points to 1,114 points, a drop of 78%. Pets.com and Webvan went bankrupt. But during this time, Amazon’s stock price fell from $107 to $7 (a drop of 93%), yet Jeff Bezos did not stop investing — he was secretly developing an internal project called "Amazon Web Services." Google launched AdWords in 2002, laying the groundwork for search advertising infrastructure.
Divergence of Infrastructure vs Price: Fiber broadband installation peaked from 2001-2003 (during the bubble, Global Crossing laid 100,000 miles of fiber, which were acquired post-bankruptcy at 10% of the cost). Server infrastructure, e-commerce logistics networks, search engine algorithms — all of this "Web 2.0" infrastructure was completed during the stock market crash when no one was paying attention.
Outcome: AWS officially launched in 2006 and became Amazon's largest source of profit a decade later. Google AdWords became the most profitable advertising product in human history. Fiber networks became the transmission layer for YouTube, Netflix, and Zoom. Infrastructure built during the darkest times became toll booths in the next cycle.
📉 Cycle Two: 2018-2019 Crypto Winter → DeFi Summer 2020
What happened: BTC fell from $19,783 to $3,122 (a decline of 84%). The ICO bubble completely burst, and "blockchain" was declared dead in mainstream media. But during the same period —
•Uniswap released its first version (V1) at Devcon 4 in November 2018
•Compound completed its seed round and began building an on-chain lending protocol
•MakerDAO's DAI stablecoin scaled in 2019
•Synthetix and Aave (then called ETHLend) completed core product iterations during this time
Divergence of Infrastructure vs Price: When BTC was bottoming around $3,000, the total locked value (TVL) of DeFi was less than $500 million — almost negligible. But the infrastructure for smart contracts (AMM model, lending pools, price oracles) was being built during this "unattended" period.
Outcome: In June 2020, Compound issued the COMP token, initiating "liquidity mining." DeFi Summer exploded — TVL surged from less than $1 billion to $15 billion (15 times), and the UNI airdrop ($1,200+/person) became the most famous wealth distribution event in crypto history. Those who understood the Uniswap whitepaper during the 2019 bear market became the winners of DeFi in 2020.
📉 Cycle Three: 2022-2023 FTX Collapse → BTC ETF Approval
What happened: FTX collapsed in November 2022, BTC fell to $15,599. SBF was arrested, BlockFi, Celsius, and Voyager filed for bankruptcy one after another. The crypto industry was seen as a "crime scene" by Wall Street and regulators.
But during this same period — - BlackRock submitted its application for a BTC spot ETF on June 15, 2023 - Fidelity, Invesco, VanEck, and ARK quickly followed - Traditional financial institutions accelerated the construction of crypto custody, compliance clearing, and market-making infrastructures behind the scenes
Divergence of Infrastructure vs Price: When retail investors were fleeing and selling at $16,000, the largest asset management institutions were preparing to establish a regulated market access pipeline for crypto assets open to institutions.
Outcome: In January 2024, the SEC approved 11 BTC spot ETFs. The first-day trading volume was $4.6 billion. BTC climbed from $25K to over $73K within 12 months. ETF is not the end of the price — it is the starting point for price to rediscover the value of infrastructure.
🔑 These three cycles tell us a common rule
Core Rule: Prices can fall 80%, but if infrastructure construction does not stop, then 12-24 months later, the infrastructure will prove the value of its existence through price.
The difference in 2026 is that the current round of infrastructure builders is not crypto-native entrepreneurs (like Uniswap in 2018), but BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, JPMorgan, the UK government, and Hyundai. This means —
1. The probability of infrastructure completion is higher. The balance sheets and regulatory relationships of these institutions mean that the tokenization alliance will not disband just because BTC drops to $50K.
2. But the beneficiaries of infrastructure may be different. The crypto-native team built Uniswap in 2018, and DeFi users made big money in 2020. The tokenization alliance is built by the world's largest financial institutions in 2026 — when the infrastructure is completed, the toll booths may not belong to the community.
3. The time window may be shortening. From Post-FTX to ETF approval took only 14 months, much shorter than the 4 years of the Dot-Com. If the UK Tokenization Taskforce's 2-year roadmap is real, we may see the first results as early as 2027-2028.
⚠️ Past performance of cycles does not guarantee future results. The current market structure, regulatory environment, and macroeconomic background are significantly different from the aforementioned cycles. The historical comparisons in this article are for analytical framework reference only and do not constitute any predictions or guarantees about future trends.
5. The Valuation Logic of Price and Infrastructure Separates
When BlackRock joins the tokenization alliance with $11.5 trillion AUM, when Hyundai uses stablecoins for real trade, when Bolivia's sovereign government chooses USDT rather than traditional banks — the value narrative of the crypto industry is no longer solely reliant on BTC prices.
But this does not mean that BTC prices have lost their significance. BTC remains the core anchor of liquidity for the entire industry. From a logical perspective, if BTC prices are under pressure, ETF outflows continue, and the macro environment further worsens (Fed rate hikes, rising oil prices pushing up inflation), the pace of infrastructure development may slow but is expected not to stop. This is the core meaning of "major divergence": price and infrastructure are two independent variables, and their coupling is weakening.
To add: This article argues that "the valuation logic of infrastructure and price is separating," not "infrastructure investment is superior to other strategies." Infrastructure construction may also face uncertainties such as regulatory delays, technical risks, and lower-than-expected commercial adoption. All investment decisions should be independently assessed by the reader.
6. Observation Window: What to Watch in the Next 90 Days?
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
