Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

Understanding the Reasons for the Recent Surge in the Storage Industry in One Article

CN
PANews
Follow
1 hour ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

Author: hoidya|𝟎𝐱𝐔

1/ What is the storage industry?

The storage industry is primarily composed of three core products: DRAM, NAND, and HBM. Together, they form the data memory system for all digital devices. Whether it is a mobile phone, computer, or data center, this layer of infrastructure must be relied upon for temporary data processing and long-term storage.

From a system architecture perspective, the storage industry is not a component independent of the computing system but rather a foundational dependency layer for all computing systems. Any computing task must first "read data," then "compute," and finally "write back results." Therefore, storage is one of the fundamental constraints in the computing process, rather than an optional module.

In the past two decades, the demand for this industry primarily came from three sources: consumer electronics (mobile phones and PCs), enterprise servers, and internet infrastructure. These demands share common characteristics: high dispersion, delayed renewal cycles, and limited scale of single-point demand. Thus, the market has long classified it as a typical cyclical semiconductor industry.

2/ Why has storage been seen as a cyclical industry for a long time?

When demand rises, prices increase rapidly, prompting manufacturers to expand production. However, as capacity construction cycles usually range from 12 to 24 months, the new supply often concentrates on release after the demand inflection point, leading to a rapid price decline. This mechanism forms a typical boom-bust cycle.

3/ What was the demand structure like before AI?

In this structure, storage, as a standardized product, is primarily priced based on supply-demand relationships rather than the long-term locked demand of a single large customer. Therefore, the market has a high spot attribute, allowing price signals to quickly reflect inventory changes and capacity adjustments.

4/ Why has AI fundamentally changed the storage demand structure? (From cyclical goods to infrastructure)

More critically, there have been changes on the supply side: since HBM profitability is significantly higher than traditional DRAM, manufacturers are proactively reallocating capacity, shifting wafers from DDR4/DDR5 production to HBM production. This structural squeezing effect causes traditional DRAM and NAND to experience "non-demand-driven shortages."

5/ How was storage priced in the past?

Prices are driven by inventory cycles, rather than demand structure.

The core constraint of this mechanism is the "lag of capacity construction (1-2 years) + demand deferrability."

However, this mechanism has been disrupted in the AI era, due to the simultaneous changes in two variables:

  • First, demand has shifted from dispersed consumption to centralized procurement.
  • Second, supply has shifted from "free market expansion" to "profit-priority allocation (HBM prioritized)."

6/ What structural changes are currently happening?

This structural adjustment has led to two results:

  • First, traditional DRAM supply is contracting.
  • Second, NAND is entering a state of passive shortage.

More extreme signals are coming from the delivery side: industry lead times have already extended from a normal 8-12 weeks to 39-52 weeks, with some automotive-grade memory even exceeding 70 weeks.

Price increases → manufacturers reduce spot supply → buyers lock in orders early → further reduce spot liquidity → prices continue to rise.

7/ Who benefits from this structure?

First layer: Supply side (Samsung / SK hynix / Micron)

These companies lock in future supplies through long-term contracts, essentially performing "time arbitrage": using current capital expenditures to secure future AI computing power and memory costs.

They find themselves between cash flow pressures and computing power needs, forming a closed loop through financing → capex → re-locking supply.

8/ Risks and conditions for falsification

Second, if the HBM technology path is replaced (for example, with new memory architectures or compute-memory fusion), the current HBM premium will be compressed, leading to a reflow of capacity back to DRAM/NAND.

In other words, the premise for this structure to hold is:

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

OKX 助你用AI“做生意”
广告
|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by PANews

53 minutes ago
Silicon Valley Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang earned 30 times by investing in storage stocks?
2 hours ago
The previous PoW protocols of Bitcoin have recently been redone by someone.
3 hours ago
"Big Short" Barry and legendary mogul Jones jointly warn: the AI frenzy resembles the night before the 2000 crash.
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatarOdaily星球日报
2 minutes ago
Jensen Huang's CMU speech: In the AI era, do not stand by, go build.
avatar
avatarForesight News
21 minutes ago
All in AI, All in Web 4.0, originally just opening a transfer station to sell Token.
avatar
avatar白话区块链
27 minutes ago
Exclusive Interview with Zhao Changpeng (CZ): "The Freedom of Money," Imprisonment Years and the Vast Ocean of Cryptocurrency
avatar
avatar深潮TechFlow
40 minutes ago
TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Bitcoin briefly broke through 82,000, SUI rose by 50% in a single day.
avatar
avatar深潮TechFlow
43 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency funds have seen net inflows for six consecutive weeks, with the CLARITY Act driving $858 million in capital influx.
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink