On April 15, 2026, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government officially announced a special subsidy of up to 40 million yen, using real money to stimulate yen-denominated on-chain payments and settlement applications. According to the policy design, a single project can receive a grant of no more than 2/3 of the total funding, and the subsidy can cover a complete set of upfront costs including system development, compliance consulting, and security auditing. On the surface, this is a typical fiscal stimulus for digital financial innovation, but the core contradiction points to a more fundamental issue: when the government tries to “create demand” with subsidies, will the market respond favorably, and will yen on-chain assets be spontaneously used in daily transactions? It is certain that from this day forward, the competition for dominance in the yen-denominated stablecoin ecosystem has officially commenced in Tokyo.

The Implicit Conditions of Tokyo's 40 Million Yen Payout

The 40 million yen cap + no more than two-thirds funding proportion set by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government essentially constitutes an incentive structure that is “accessible but not guaranteed”: the amount is sufficient to cover key early expenses for medium and large projects, but requires companies to bear at least one-third of the costs, meaning that genuine participants must put forward funds and resources to share the risk. This design not only avoids a completely “free subsidy,” but also significantly increases the risk-return ratio of expected project benefits through a higher subsidy rate.

In terms of coverage, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government explicitly includes system development, compliance/business consulting, and security auditing in the subsidizable costs, which is precisely the part where most institutions hesitate the most and find it hardest to estimate expenses when planning for yen on-chain: technological development requires professional teams, compliance consulting must adhere to financial regulatory requirements, and smart contract and system security auditing represents a considerable expense. For traditional financial institutions, e-commerce platforms, or cross-border service providers, these upfront costs are often one of the main reasons for “watchful waiting.”

When placed in the broader context of Japan’s longer path of digital economic development, this move is not an isolated flash of insight, but a part of continuing fiscal guidance—from early tax breaks for innovative tech companies, to later subsidies for digital infrastructure, and now precise support for yen on-chain applications, the government has been subtly adjusting market directions through budget arrangements. The distinction this time is that the subsidy is more concentrated on the cost side of compliance infrastructure and risk control, signaling clearly: what Tokyo prefers to see are projects that treat yen as a regulated settlement tool, rather than merely a speculative asset.

This subsidy design favoring infrastructure and compliance costs also sketches out the “ideal sample” in the government’s view: institutions that dare to operate within strict frameworks, have clear business models, and can withstand auditing and regulatory scrutiny, rather than speculative applications that pursue short-term traffic and high volatility narratives. In other words, the goal of Tokyo's funding is not to encourage any form of on-chain yen, but to hope to lock yen-denominated stablecoins into a track of “compliance, controllability, and serving real-world settlement.”

Who Will Use the Yen On-Chain: Government's Push vs. Market's Choice

From the perspective of potential applicants, the most motivated parties likely to compete for the Tokyo Metropolitan subsidy are probably those already possessing yen funding pools and payment scenarios: first, banks, payment institutions, brokers, and other financial institutions that are familiar with compliance processes and have motives to optimize clearing efficiency and fund position management with yen on-chain assets; second, large e-commerce and offline payment network operators that, if they can integrate yen on-chain payments into their collection systems, have opportunities to reduce settlement costs and enhance appeal to cross-border consumers; third, cross-border settlement and remittance service providers, which naturally need to circulate yen within Asia and even globally, and can further compress time and intermediaries after going on-chain.

However, there has been no specific list of applying enterprises or types of first batch pilot projects disclosed in the available information, leading to a significant divergence in the market regarding the speed of policy implementation. Some observers believe that since the subsidy plan was announced in mid-April, initial communication must have already taken place, and the first batch of projects may be in the filing or proposal refinement stages; others are more cautious, suggesting that in the relatively stable financial regulatory environment in Japan, the timeline from subsidy announcement to the actual launch of usable on-chain yen products may be much longer than the public anticipates. This uncertainty reflects the suspense over how the market will respond after the government’s “pull.”

Looking at the incentive structure itself, for whom is the subsidy cap of no more than 2/3 of funding actually “tailor-made”? For financial giants that are not short of money, this subsidy resembles risk hedging more: they already have a budget to explore digital finance, and the new subsidy merely optimizes the investment-return ratio of the projects; for startups or small to medium enterprises, the one-third self-raised cost still poses pressure, especially in Japan’s environment where compliance requirements are strict and the scope for trial and error is limited. Consequently, this plan is objectively more likely to be utilized by established players with stronger financial capabilities and compliance abilities, and startups may need to collaborate with large institutions or provide highly differentiated technological capabilities to leverage the subsidy.

The real challenge is that even if the subsidy lowers the “pilot costs,” whether yen-denominated on-chain assets can naturally grow into real use cases still depends on the voluntary choices of users and businesses. If on-chain yen is merely used as an “internal clearing backend tool” without entering the “frontend interface” of consumer payments and cross-border trade, then its ecological appearance, however exquisite, will struggle to form true network effects. The government can decide who is qualified to sit at the table, but cannot force the market to long-term “pay” for a payment and settlement system that lacks advantages.

Sovereign Anxiety and On-Chain Expansion: Tokyo's Proactive Move to Go On-Chain

At the same time the Tokyo Metropolitan Government announced the subsidy, a completely different voice emerged within the South Korean National Assembly. South Korean lawmaker Kim Sang-hoon publicly warned that fiat-denominated on-chain assets could pose a potential threat to national monetary sovereignty, arguing that negligence in regulation could undermine the central bank's control over currency issuance and circulation. Behind this narrative is a concern that a "borderless on-chain payment system" could bypass traditional regulation and amplify cross-border capital flows.

On one hand, there is vigilance against on-chain assets eroding sovereignty, while on the other, Tokyo actively uses fiscal subsidies to push sovereign currency onto the chain, showcasing a stark contrast in attitude between Tokyo and Seoul. South Korea examines on-chain assets more from a “defensive” perspective, focusing on controlling risks and maintaining the stability of the existing monetary system; whereas Tokyo’s choice appears more aligned with “taking initiative”: since on-chain finance cannot be ignored, it is better to let the yen itself become an important chip in this new system, using officially supported on-chain yen to hedge against the squeezing effect that privately owned or foreign currency-dominated on-chain payment networks might bring.

From the perspective of cross-border settlement and capital movement, yen-denominated on-chain assets could significantly enhance the speed and convenience of capital crossing borders once scaled for use in regional trade and capital allocation: cross-border e-commerce could complete payments in a shorter time frame, and institutional investors could more swiftly allocate yen assets across various Asian markets. For sovereign managers, this presents both an opportunity to increase the international usage of the currency and a challenge to capital controls, anti-money laundering, and macro-prudential tools, thus further amplifying the tension between sovereignty and openness.

This round of subsidies from the Tokyo Metropolitan Government represents, to some extent, both an acknowledgment of the “window period for digital financial innovation” and a passive counteraction to the dominance of the dollar on-chain. Over the past few years, various kinds of on-chain assets denominated in dollars and dollar-denominated trading pairs have held overwhelming shares in the global crypto-financial infrastructure; if the yen remains long absent, it means Japan has virtually no voice in this rapidly forming new financial dimension. Choosing to promote the yen's on-chain presence with subsidy funds acknowledges this reality while attempting to reclaim a sovereign financial space on this new technical stack.

Same Day, Different Moves: From Hong Kong's T+1 to Exchange Risk Reduction

On April 15, it was not just Tokyo adjusting its relationship with on-chain finance; at the same time, Hong Kong's push for T+1 settlement reform also drew attention. Although specific institutional provisions and technical routes have yet to be elaborated, the direction of the reform itself means Hong Kong is actively compressing the settlement cycle of the traditional securities market, enhancing fund turnover efficiency, and reserving institutional space for potential interactions with on-chain assets and tokenized securities. Unlike Tokyo's focus on yen on-chain applications, Hong Kong's actions lean more towards upgrading overall market infrastructure to boost its attractiveness as a regional financial hub by enhancing the settlement efficiency of traditional markets.

On the same day, one of the world's largest cryptocurrency exchanges, Binance, reported news of delisting certain tokens (including DEGO, among others), interpreted in the industry as a move by trading platforms to proactively reduce their risk asset pools amid rising global compliance pressures. Although the specific delisting list and technical details are not directly related to the Tokyo subsidy, the event itself constitutes a subtle echo: on one end, public sectors hope to use subsidies to guide more compliant and controllable on-chain yen applications, while on the other end, exchanges are using a “negative list” approach to cut out high-risk and heavily regulated varieties, clearing a safer entry path for mainstream institutional capital.

A horizontal comparison reveals a contrast: on one side, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government provides a budget to promote the compliant yen on-chain, attempting to embed sovereign currency at the base of the new financial stack; on the other side, large trading platforms narrow their risk exposure through delisting measures, shifting the overall ecology “in a direction acceptable to regulators.” Combined with Hong Kong's upgrades in settlement efficiency and market rules, the major financial centers in Asia are collectively reshaping the next round of cryptocurrency funding channels using their own preferred tools—fiscal subsidies, institutional reform, and asset selection—wherever the more secure and compliant entry is found, that entity is more likely to become the hub for regional and even global cryptocurrency capital movements.

Yen On-Chain Offense and Defense: What Financial Authority Does Japan Want to Reclaim?

Looking back over a longer timeline, Japan's path of supporting the digital economy through fiscal means is not unfamiliar: whether through early budget support for cloud computing and the Internet of Things, or various subsidy plans around digital transformation in recent years, the government has always used financial signals to guide the market. This special subsidy for yen on-chain applications can be seen as an extension of this policy tradition into the fields of digital finance and on-chain assets—it's just that moving from “digital industry” to “digital currency application” signifies Japan beginning to test its policy space in more core financial areas.

Once yen-denominated on-chain assets successfully establish infrastructure, they may play two roles in regional trade and foreign investment: first, as a more efficient settlement medium, helping Japanese companies complete payments within the Asian supply chain at lower costs, and reducing dependence on third-party currencies; second, as a new store of value, enabling institutions and individuals holding yen assets to manage yields, finance via collateral, and even participate in decentralized financial agreements directly on-chain, thus expanding the usage scope of yen assets. The combination of both roles will provide a new capacity for the yen's presence in the international financial system.

The backdrop to this arrangement is a long-term trend of the yen's declining influence in traditional foreign exchange markets: as its safe-haven attributes are increasingly diverted to the dollar and Swiss franc, and with domestic ultra-loose monetary policy misaligned with overseas tightening cycles, the yen's attractiveness to global capital has relatively diminished. Whether yen on-chain can become Japan's "testing ground" for reclaiming a new round of financial authority largely depends on whether it can provide higher efficiency on the technical level, maintain sufficient credibility at the regulatory level, and find real application scenarios at the business level that cannot do without it. Otherwise, “yen on-chain” may merely become a technological upgrade rather than a repositioning.

It is important to recognize that the Tokyo Metropolitan Government is ultimately a local government, playing more of a “trailblazer” and “policy sandbox” role in the national monetary and financial strategy than directly formulating the currency policy. However, Tokyo is also the financial and technological center of Japan, and its policy successes or failures will be viewed by the outside world as a bellwether for the “Japanese model”: if the yen on-chain ecosystem led by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government can produce successful examples, it could provide replicable experiences at the central government level; conversely, if the subsidy-driven projects fail to form sustainable business operations, the national level will proceed with greater caution in promoting a broader scope of yen on-chain. Thus, Tokyo's step is both a local ambition and an attempt to test the temperature for the nation.

After Subsidies, Can the Yen Stand Firm On-Chain?

In summary, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government's latest subsidy of up to 40 million yen can substantially lower the costs for institutions to pilot the on-chain yen, alleviating the initial pressure of development, compliance, and auditing, yet it cannot replace the market's judgment on real usage value. The government can use its budget to facilitate the birth of a number of projects, but it cannot “buy” trading activity with its budget in the long term, nor can it maintain an ecosystem lacking endogenous business logic through subsidies.

The key variables determining whether the yen can stand firm on-chain have already emerged outside of policy: the quality of the first batch of implemented scenarios (are they high-frequency essential payments, or one-off demonstration projects?), the depth of participation by financial institutions (is it PR-style collaboration or truly integrating yen on-chain assets into balance sheets and clearing systems?), and the clarity of regulatory boundaries (can participants clearly understand which behaviors are permitted, and which must be declared or are restricted). Only when these three points form a positive feedback loop can subsidy funds potentially be amplified into sustainable ecological momentum.

In the broader context of regional competition, Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Seoul are all attempting to find their respective positions on the same Asian digital financial map. Tokyo bets on “sovereign currency on-chain + compliance infrastructure,” Hong Kong reinforces “efficient settlement + global capital hub,” while Seoul seeks a balance between sovereign risk and innovation pressure. In the future, these financial centers may form a division of labor—some responsible for rules and clearing, others for asset issuance and trading—yet conflicts and struggles over capital ownership, regulatory standards, and technical route choices are inevitable.

For mid-term observations, assessing the effectiveness of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government's policy cannot solely focus on the number of subsidized projects or the “surface-level heat” indicators like the number of on-chain transactions; rather, what is more crucial is whether yen has formed a sustainable business closed loop on-chain: whether companies continue to expand scenarios without subsidies, whether users are willing to hold and use on-chain yen long-term, and whether financial institutions include it within their risk management and asset allocation frameworks. Once these conditions are met, “the Tokyo Metropolitan Government pouring 40 million yen” could truly translate into securing a sustainable foothold for yen in the new financial order.

Join our community, let's discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram group: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。