On Thursday, January 22, 2026, at 8:00 AM UTC+8, the cryptocurrency asset custody company BitGo confirmed the issuance of 11.8 million shares on the New York Stock Exchange at a price of $18 per share, aiming to raise $213 million, with the stock code BTGO. This pricing is not only higher than the previously expected range of $15 to $17 but also stands in stark contrast to the fluctuating sentiment and significant valuation corrections in the cryptocurrency market over the past two years. As the first large cryptocurrency-related company to go public in the U.S. in 2026, BitGo's IPO is seen by many market participants as the first litmus test after the "crypto winter"—whether it marks the beginning of the next recovery or is merely an isolated event amplified by sentiment is becoming a focal point of interest for both Wall Street and the crypto community.
The Significance of the First Crypto IPO in 2026
● Background of Market Sentiment Correction: Since 2024, the cryptocurrency industry has transitioned from high volatility and high valuations to cautious pricing and profit orientation. Large assets in the secondary market have undergone multiple deep corrections, leading to a reevaluation of early-stage infrastructure companies that expanded rapidly. In 2025, several cryptocurrency-related companies planning to go public in the U.S. chose to postpone or delay their processes due to regulatory uncertainties and valuation compressions, creating a "conservative and selective" valuation environment for BitGo's official entry.
● The First Crypto Company to Go Public in 2026: At this cyclical juncture, BitGo has become the first large cryptocurrency-related company to go public in the U.S. in 2026, inherently carrying the connotation of being a "pathfinder." On one hand, it must confront traditional investors' fatigue and skepticism towards the crypto sector; on the other hand, as a provider of custody and compliance infrastructure, it is naturally viewed as closer to the regulatory framework. This "dual identity" elevates its IPO from a mere corporate event to a pressure test for measuring the "re-handshake" between crypto assets and traditional capital.
● Historical Comparisons Highlight the Timing: Reviewing previous IPOs of cryptocurrency companies in the U.S., it is evident that they often concentrated around periods of heightened sentiment and soaring valuations, with significant price fluctuations on the listing day and in the following months, reflecting speculative sentiment rather than the business model itself. In contrast, BitGo chose to step into the public market after a substantial correction in crypto valuations, making its timing a stark contrast to previous high-point listings and framing this IPO as an experiment in "re-pricing in the freezing zone," where the significance of the timing far exceeds the success or failure of a single company.
Implicit Information Behind the $18 Pricing Exceeding the Expected Range
● Premium and Fundraising Scale: BitGo's final issuance price is set at $18, above the previously circulated expected range of $15 to $17, indicating an uplift of about $1 per share compared to the upper end of expectations. With an issuance scale of 11.8 million shares, the total fundraising corresponds to $213 million. In the current environment where cryptocurrency-related assets generally face valuation discounts, this result of "exceeding the price guidance upper limit" at least suggests that the buyer inquiries during the book-building process were not entirely dominated by pessimistic sentiment, with some funds willing to pay a price closer to or slightly above the upper range for this custody infrastructure company.
● Primary Pricing Attitude Beyond the Secondary Market: According to multiple media reports, BitGo's IPO corresponds to a valuation of over $2 billion, a level that is not conservative in the fundraising environment post-crypto winter. Although the specific valuation composition and financial expectations have not been fully disclosed, it is clear that the primary market does not simply view it as a "cyclical stock," but rather applies a valuation approach closer to that of an infrastructure platform—focusing more on long-term cash flows related to custody, compliance, and service stickiness rather than short-term trading volume fluctuations. This pricing attitude reflects, to some extent, the patience and tolerance of funds towards its business model.
● The Boundaries of the "Compliance Custody Demand" Narrative: Some market voices suggest that the pricing above the expected range "reflects strong institutional demand for compliance custody services," interpreting it as a revaluation of compliance infrastructure against a backdrop of tightening regulations. However, such interpretations remain unverified viewpoints, lacking detailed data support regarding order book structure, investor composition, etc., and should be seen as an observational direction rather than a conclusion. For readers, a more cautious attitude is to view the $18 price as a slightly optimistic choice in the current environment, rather than a definitive judgment on the overall demand for the custody sector.
From Niche Custody to Wall Street Asset Entry
● Shift in Role Positioning: BitGo has long focused on cryptocurrency asset custody and related compliance infrastructure services, a field that was relatively niche in the narrative of the last bull market, often overshadowed by more high-profile trading platforms and issuance projects. As the industry undergoes a cleansing, custody security, risk control, and compliance capabilities are being brought back to the forefront. The multi-signature custody, institutional-grade wallets, and backend clearing services provided by BitGo are gradually shifting from "technical supporting roles" to fundamental issues that institutions must address when entering the market, positioning itself at the interface between cryptocurrency assets and the traditional financial system.
● The Logic Chain of Rising Institutional Demand: With the emergence of Bitcoin spot ETFs, compliant exchanges, and cryptocurrency-related funds, a question that traditional institutions cannot avoid is: how to securely and audibly custody underlying assets within a regulatory-approved framework. Whether it is ETF issuers, custodial banks, or multi-strategy funds and family offices, they all need to rely on professional custodians to handle complex aspects such as key management, asset segregation, and compliance reporting. As product structures continue to diversify, custody demand not only expands in scale but also raises the bar for compliance depth and technical security, providing clearer commercial amplification paths for service providers like BitGo.
● Signals from Goldman Sachs and Citigroup: According to public information, the lead underwriters for BitGo's IPO are Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, a combination that represents a "serious bet" on a particular sector in traditional finance. The willingness of these two investment banks to participate as lead underwriters at least indicates their judgment that the custody and compliance infrastructure sector possesses certain long-term strategic value, rather than being merely a short-term theme. From Wall Street's perspective, a company like BitGo, which operates between technology and financial regulation, offers a low-risk entry point that can share in industry growth, a "risk-reward ratio" that traditional investment banks find more acceptable when laying out their crypto strategies.
A Barometer After the Winter or a One-Time Event
● Subjectivity of the "Recovery Barometer" View: Some analysts believe that BitGo's pricing above expectations "may become a barometer for market recovery after the crypto winter," speculating that more infrastructure companies will attempt to restart their listing processes. It is important to emphasize that such views are subjective opinions, reflecting analysts' expectations for a cyclical reversal rather than being based on long-term capital inflow data or ongoing valuation recovery trends. Currently, it is more suitable as a thermometer for observing market sentiment rather than an objective depiction of an industry turning point.
● Short-Term Trading Volatility and Valuation Digestion: Based on past experiences with cryptocurrency company IPOs, stock prices often experience significant fluctuations driven by sentiment and themes in the days following the listing. With BitGo entering the New York Stock Exchange at a valuation exceeding $2 billion, it may enjoy a thematic premium as the "first crypto IPO of 2026" in the short term, but it also faces a rapid pricing process between financial data, growth expectations, and valuation levels. The performance on the day of the IPO, turnover rate, and underwriters' stabilization operations will all influence the market's judgment on whether this high pricing can "hold up."
● Historical Volatility Sounds the Alarm for Current Pricing: Looking back at the trajectories of previous leading cryptocurrency companies after their listings in the U.S., it is not uncommon to see a pattern of soaring on the first day followed by deep pullbacks in the following months, with price fluctuations far exceeding those of traditional financial service companies. Similarly, as a target closely related to industry prosperity, even if BitGo performs well in the short term, it is difficult to completely escape the pull of cyclical volatility and regulatory news in the industry. For investors participating in this IPO, a more reasonable expectation is that it may symbolize emotional recovery, but it could also return to a price range closer to fundamentals after a short-term speculative retreat.
The Blurred Boundaries of Regulatory Shadows and Compliance Dividends
● The "Regulatory Advantage" Narrative Remains to be Verified: Discussions surrounding BitGo have included viewpoints attempting to characterize it as a "custody target with regulatory advantages," extrapolating potential first-mover dividends in obtaining licenses and institutional collaborations. However, there is currently limited public information regarding its specific regulatory status, future policy directions, and competitor layouts, so such "regulatory advantage" qualitative judgments should be viewed as unverified information, rather than certainties that can be directly internalized into valuation models, to avoid amplifying speculative narratives before facts are clarified.
● The Imagination Space of Compliance Narratives: From custody compliance, business licenses to audit transparency, BitGo's story has naturally been integrated into the main narrative of "compliance infrastructure." Investors are likely to expect that its progress in multi-jurisdictional licensing, third-party audits, and asset segregation mechanisms can translate into more stable institutional collaborations and higher bargaining power. However, in the absence of complete details from the prospectus, these expectations remain largely at the narrative level, and whether they can form a sustainable compliance premium will require subsequent disclosures and regulatory interactions to gradually verify.
● Policies and Disclosures May Still Rewrite Details: According to media reports, some final details of BitGo's IPO may still be adjusted, meaning that results from regulatory communications, information disclosure requirements, and even market conditions could impact the fundraising scale, issuance structure, and subsequent circulation arrangements. For a company centered on "compliance custody," any new requirements from the regulatory side could pose short-term pressures while potentially strengthening its competitive moat in the long term. Therefore, while viewing it as a representative of crypto compliance dividends, it is equally important to recognize that the uncertainty of policy changes still looms over the narrative.
The Next Chapter of Crypto Beyond BitGo's Pricing
BitGo's listing on the New York Stock Exchange at $18, above the upper end of the expected range, undoubtedly carries symbolic significance in the current stage of cryptocurrency valuations still in early recovery: on one hand, it demonstrates that traditional capital markets have not completely closed the financing window for crypto infrastructure, with the custody and compliance sector still able to leverage over $213 million in new funds amid cautious sentiment; on the other hand, this symbolism has clear limitations— the performance of a single company's IPO cannot simply be extrapolated as a trend reversal for the entire cryptocurrency industry, nor can it erase the realities of regulatory uncertainties and the unfinished validation of business models.
If BitGo can maintain relatively stable trading performance in the medium to short term after its listing, rather than repeating the old path of "soaring high and then rapidly retreating," it indeed has the opportunity to open a new window for more cryptocurrency infrastructure companies to go public in the U.S., especially those similarly focused on compliance services and institutional clients. Conversely, if its valuation quickly encounters discounts in the secondary market, this window may tighten again, prompting potential issuers to reassess their listing timing and pricing expectations. Therefore, for investors, the focus should not only be on the first-day fluctuations but also on the transaction structure, institutional participation, and the alignment between subsequent performance realization and stock price movements.
In the coming period, BitGo will update the details of its business segmentation, revenue composition, and risk disclosures in its revised prospectus, which will further reveal its true profitability and growth resilience; the lock-up period release arrangements will affect the medium- to long-term selling pressure rhythm and chip distribution; at the same time, regulatory dynamics, audit requirements, and changes in licensing policies surrounding the custody business may still rewrite the capital market narrative for this company. BitGo's IPO may serve as a litmus test, but whether it reveals "the gold of recovery" or "the sand of sentiment" will require time and data to answer.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
