On January 20, 2026, Eastern Standard Time, multiple crypto media outlets reported that the staking rate of the Solana network has risen to 68.8%, setting a new historical high. This figure indicates that a significant portion of the circulating SOL tokens is locked within the network's consensus and security mechanisms, with holders participating in network operations through staking in exchange for potential rewards and governance rights. A high staking rate is seen as a direct reflection of increased ecological participation and a stronger willingness among holders to lock up their assets. Institutions like TechFlow and PANews interpret this as a signal of "continuously improving ecological health." However, it has also reignited discussions about validator centralization and governance power skewed towards a few nodes. This article will focus on this critical 68.8% milestone, analyzing the current staking landscape of Solana in terms of network security buffers, decentralization pressures, and changes in liquidity structure, and will assess the risks and opportunities that need to be closely monitored in the future.

New Staking High and Ecological Thermometer

● Time and Source: According to simultaneous reports from multiple media outlets including TechFlow, PANews, and Cointelegraph on January 20, 2026, the staking rate of the Solana network has climbed to 68.8%, clearly marked as a historical high. Under cross-verification from multiple sources, this figure is widely accepted as the current reference benchmark within the community and market.
● Milestone Significance: Historically, the staking rate of Solana has long maintained a relatively high range, and now reaching 68.8% is seen by the community as a turning point for further expansion of staking participation. Although there is a lack of verifiable precise historical comparison percentages, this record appears to be an elevation based on existing high participation levels, reinforcing the market image of a "high lock-up chain."
● Lock-up Willingness and Confidence: PANews describes this 68.8% as a "strong willingness to lock up," while TechFlow summarizes this phenomenon as "continuously improving ecological health." A high staking ratio indicates that a large number of SOL holders choose to participate in network security and potential rewards long-term, rather than frequently speculating in the secondary market, reflecting a certain level of trust in Solana's medium to long-term prospects.
● Network Status Portrait: Against this staking backdrop, Solana not only demonstrates a thicker security "firewall" but also shows strong cohesion among holders and participation stickiness. The rise in staking rate and the media narrative of "health" mutually reinforce each other, making the 68.8% figure an important gauge for external perceptions of Solana's current network temperature.

High Staking and Amplified Security Buffer Effects

Solana employs a proof-of-stake mechanism, where token staking is directly tied to network security and consensus stability. Within this framework, a higher staking rate means that if attackers wish to launch a 51% attack, they need to control and lock up a significantly larger amount of SOL, thereby exponentially increasing the actual cost of an attack. After the staking rate surged to 68.8%, it becomes significantly more difficult for potential malicious actors to quietly accumulate enough tokens in the secondary or over-the-counter markets, thus enhancing the system's defense against economic attacks. Additionally, more tokens participating in staking will improve the efficiency of punishing malicious nodes; if a validator attempts to double-sign or act maliciously, the penalties for reducing staking will be more deterrent. In discussions among media and the community regarding "ecological health" and "participation," a high staking rate is often accompanied by a more active ecosystem of validators and delegators. Node operators need to maintain good block performance and stable online rates to attract and retain delegators, while delegators, through regular adjustments of their staking targets, effectively participate in the redistribution of network resources. As more applications and assets settle on Solana, the reliance of on-chain projects and funds on network security expectations also increases. Various DeFi, NFT, on-chain trading, and clearing activities are, in a sense, "betting" on the reliability of the underlying consensus. The 68.8% staking level is becoming a key security signal for these upper-layer ecosystems when making deployment decisions.

Rising Staking Rate and Decentralization Pressure

However, a high staking rate does not automatically equate to high decentralization. If a large amount of staking is concentrated among a few leading validators or large staking service providers, governance power and block production authority may become highly concentrated in the hands of a few entities, leading to increased risks of censorship and governance bias. If validator rights become overly centralized, the influence of a few nodes on transaction ordering, network upgrade voting, and even potential censorship will be amplified, creating tension with the underlying vision of "openness and neutrality" of public chains. Therefore, it is essential to clearly distinguish between two concepts: the so-called "high staking rate" reflects the overall level of participation and the thickness of the security buffer, while "high decentralization" depends on the number of validators, the distribution of staking, and the voting power limits that a single entity can control. What truly determines the network's power structure is how staking is distributed among nodes, not the total amount itself. In the Solana community, discussions around validator centralization have become a long-term topic. The market welcomes the security and confidence boost brought by the 68.8%, but also repeatedly reminds that as large staking service providers and trading platforms expand their client staking scales, they must simultaneously pay attention to changes in power concentration. This debate itself reflects an increasing sensitivity within the ecosystem to the balance between "security and decentralization."

Capital Lock-up and Restructuring of Circulation

When nearly seventy percent of tokens are in a staking state, the circulation supply structure of Solana is deeply reshaped. A large proportion of SOL locked in staking contracts means that the tokens available for free trading in the secondary market are relatively tightened, structurally weakening the elasticity of short-term selling pressure. In a tighter supply-side environment, the market often finds it easier to reinforce narratives around "tokens concentrated in the hands of long-term participants" and "reducing selling pressure," viewing high staking rates as a manifestation of dominance by "steadfast holders." This narrative, in turn, can influence sentiment, making some investors more inclined to focus on network usage and ecological expansion rather than short-term price fluctuations. Under the interaction of sentiment and structure, the 68.8% figure gradually becomes symbolized, serving as a piece of "safety net" evidence for bullish supporters. However, on the flip side, the other side of lock-up is liquidity constraint. An excessively high staking ratio may weaken order book thickness and spot trading depth in highly volatile market conditions, making prices more susceptible to dramatic swings driven by sentiment. For institutions, market makers, and complex strategy funds that require large entries and exits, balancing staking rewards with maintaining flexible liquidity will be a new test. The "lock-up effect" brought by a high staking rate thus has a dual impact of compressing selling pressure and liquidity.

Future Balance Path of Security and Decentralization

Looking ahead, Solana needs to find a new balance between maintaining the security advantages brought by a high staking rate and alleviating centralization pressures, which hinges on a series of quantifiable data dimensions. Trends in the number of validators, the concentration of staking among single nodes, the proportion of overall voting power held by leading staking service providers, and governance proposal participation rates will all be important windows for observing whether the network's power structure is trending towards equilibrium. Equally important are the design and evolution of staking tools and delegation mechanisms. By implementing more detailed delegation rules, decentralized staking entry points, and incentive schemes that encourage participation from long-tail nodes, it is hoped that more SOL can be guided towards small and medium validators and diverse service providers without sacrificing the overall staking rate, thereby reducing systemic risks of "single point amplification." For investors, when evaluating Solana, it is essential to consider not only aggregate metrics like 68.8% but also to integrate multi-dimensional data such as node distribution maps, on-chain governance participation rates, and ecological development activity to comprehensively assess security and sustainability. For ecological project parties and funders, it is crucial to closely monitor network stability, trends in validator concentration, and liquidity performance under extreme market conditions, incorporating these structural indicators into long-term deployment and risk hedging frameworks.

From Milestone Figures to Long-term Narratives

In summary, Solana's staking rate surged to 68.8% on January 20, 2026, significantly thickening the network's security buffer, raising the cost of attacks and the threshold for economic malfeasance, and is viewed by media and community as a footnote to the rising "ecological health" and participation enthusiasm. On the other hand, this figure also amplifies the challenges regarding validator centralization, governance power concentration, and liquidity constraints, making the balance between "security" and "decentralization" more pronounced. The current 68.8% is more like a phase-specific "health report," providing a snapshot of Solana's participation and confidence at a specific point in time, rather than a definitive conclusion about its long-term competitiveness. In the future, the staking rate itself will remain one of the key indicators, but what truly determines the narrative direction will be whether the staking distribution becomes more balanced, whether the activity levels of ecological developers and users can continue to expand, and how the network dynamically rebalances security, decentralization, and liquidity through multiple cycles of bull and bear markets and technological iterations. In this process, maintaining a neutral yet cautious perspective and continuously tracking staking structure, governance participation, and ecological usage data may help the market better understand Solana's true position in the next phase of public chain competition, rather than merely fixating on the absolute figure of "68.8%."

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。