The stablecoin verification report provides third-party validation to ensure that each token is backed by real assets such as cash and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Verification ≠ Audit: Verification is a point-in-time check, not an in-depth financial audit, so users still need to conduct broader due diligence.
Not all tokens are redeemable. Time-locked, test, or frozen tokens are not included in the reserve calculation to reflect only actively circulating tokens.
USDC has set an industry benchmark through regular third-party verification, transparent reserve reports, and adherence to MiCA regulations.
Stablecoins play a critical role in the digital asset ecosystem, connecting traditional fiat currencies with the decentralized world of cryptocurrencies.
How can we ensure that each stablecoin is backed by real assets? This is the role of the stablecoin verification report.
Understanding how to read a verification report is crucial for those interacting with stablecoins like USDC or Tether (USDT).
This guide explains everything about stablecoin verification reports, including how they work and their importance.
A stablecoin verification report is a formal document published by an independent third party—a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) firm—to verify whether the stablecoin issuer holds sufficient reserves to support the circulating tokens.
Unlike a comprehensive audit, the scope of verification is narrower. It confirms specific facts, such as whether the reserve balance matches the circulating supply at a certain point in time.
Verification can be seen as a snapshot taken by accountants, indicating, "Yes, we checked, and the funds are there now."
While not as in-depth or extensive as an audit, it still establishes trust.
For example, if a stablecoin issuer claims that each token is backed 1:1 by U.S. dollars, the verification report will provide evidence supporting that claim. Stablecoins like USDC regularly publish such reports to demonstrate that their tokens are fully backed, thereby helping to build trust in their ecosystem.
Verification reports are particularly important for investors and institutions relying on stablecoins for cross-border settlements, collateral in loan agreements, and participation in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. A lack of confidence in the authenticity of reserves could pose a risk of collapse for the stablecoin system, affecting the broader crypto market.
Transparency is crucial in the crypto space, especially for stablecoins that serve as mediums of exchange, stores of value, and collateral on DeFi platforms. Verification reports provide a window into the reserve and disclosure practices of stablecoin issuers, allowing users, regulators, and investors to assess whether the issuer operates responsibly.
Issuers like Circle, the company behind USDC, publish verification reports to demonstrate compliance with regulatory expectations and assure users that the tokens they hold are stable not just in name but in substance as well. By doing so, they promote the security of stablecoin investors and support the integrity of the market.
This transparency lays the groundwork for regulatory trust and helps attract traditional financial institutions into the space. It also aligns with the broader industry goal of increasing stablecoin compliance, especially as global governments explore specific regulations for stablecoins.
Stablecoin verification reports are prepared by independent accounting firms. For example, Circle's USDC verification report is conducted by Deloitte (as of April 13, 2025), a leading global audit and consulting firm. These firms adhere to professional standards set by organizations such as the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants).
Independent verifiers are crucial as they eliminate conflicts of interest. Having reserves reviewed by a third party ensures that the information is impartial, credible, and meets global assurance standards.
In response to growing concerns about inconsistent stablecoin disclosures, the AICPA introduced the 2025 Stablecoin Reporting Standards, a standardized framework for fiat-pegged, asset-backed tokens.
These standards define how stablecoin issuers should present and disclose three key areas:
- The circulation of redeemable tokens.
- The availability and composition of redeemable assets.
- A comparison between the two.
The importance of the 2025 standards lies in their emphasis on transparency and comparability. For instance, token issuers must clearly define redeemable versus non-redeemable tokens (such as time-locked or test tokens), identify where and how reserves are held, and disclose any significant legal or operational risks that could affect redemption.
By aligning verification reports with this framework, accounting firms ensure that assessments are conducted using appropriate, objective, and measurable standards, which is a key requirement under U.S. verification standards. This provides investors, regulators, and DeFi users with a more consistent and reliable basis for evaluating the solvency and credibility of stablecoins.
As adoption grows, the 2025 standards may become the industry benchmark, especially as regulators increasingly rely on standardized reports to assess stablecoin risks and enforce compliance.
Did you know? Not all circulating stablecoins are redeemable. Some, like time-locked tokens, are temporarily restricted and cannot be accessed until a specific date. Others, like test tokens, are only used for internal system testing and are never intended to be redeemed. These tokens are excluded from the reserve calculations in verification reports to ensure an accurate representation of the backing for accessible stablecoins.
Reading a stablecoin verification report is not just about scanning numbers. It’s about understanding whether the stablecoin you hold is backed.
Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of how to identify what really matters:
Check the report date: Verification is a point-in-time review. Look for the exact date covered by the report (e.g., February 28, 2025). It only confirms the reserves on that day, not before or after.
Compare circulating supply with reserves: Look for the number of tokens in circulation and the total value of the reserves. The reserves should equal or exceed the supply. If not, that’s a warning sign.
Review what supports the reserves: The reserves should hold safe, liquid assets in regulated financial institutions, such as U.S. Treasury bonds or cash. Be wary of vague asset descriptions or risks.
Examine the custodian and asset details: Check who holds the funds (e.g., large banks or money market funds) and where they are stored. Remember, reputable custodians add credibility.
Understand the methodology: The report should explain how the review was conducted, what data was verified, what systems were used, and which standards were followed (e.g., AICPA).
Identify excluded tokens: Some tokens, like test tokens or time-locked tokens, are excluded from the circulation count. Look for notes explaining these exceptions.
Check who performed the verification: Independent and reputable accounting firms (like Deloitte or Grant Thornton) add legitimacy. If the verifier is undisclosed or not independent, proceed with caution. The accounting firm’s signed statement verifies the accuracy of the issuer's claims.
Investors can also look for supplementary notes in the report, such as the jurisdiction of reserve accounts, legal restrictions on assets, or clarifications on valuation techniques. All these elements help paint a more complete picture of risk and reliability.
In March 2025, Circle released its latest reserve verification report, providing a transparent view of the backing for one of the most widely used digital dollars in the crypto space.
The report was independently reviewed by Deloitte, one of the Big Four accounting firms. Deloitte confirmed that as of February 4 and February 28, 2025, the fair value of Circle's reserves was equal to or greater than the amount of USDC in circulation.
Here’s a snapshot of Circle's February 2025 verification report, showing that the circulating USDC amount was $54.95 billion on February 4 and $56.28 billion on February 28. The fair value of the reserves backing USDC exceeded these figures, at $55.01 billion and $56.35 billion, respectively.
Circle primarily holds its USDC reserves in:
- U.S. Treasury bonds
- Treasury repurchase agreements
- Cash in regulated financial institutions
These assets are kept separate from Circle's corporate funds and are managed through the Circle Reserve Fund, a regulated money market fund.
The verification also considered technical factors, such as "access denied" tokens (e.g., frozen for legal or compliance reasons) and unissued tokens, ensuring an accurate measurement of circulating USDC.
For users, this means greater confidence that each USDC token is backed by high-quality, liquid assets, as the company claims.
Did you know? As of February 4 and February 28, 2025, 993,225 USDC were permanently frozen on deprecated blockchains, including the FLOW blockchain. These tokens are excluded from the official total circulation of USDC in Circle's report.
The stablecoin verification report serves as a form of reserve proof, providing independent confirmation that the stablecoin issuer holds sufficient assets to support the circulating tokens. The verification process typically involves several key steps:
- Reviewing bank statements and financial records.
- Confirming cash balances held by custodians.
- Cross-referencing the reported reserves with third-party documentation.
- Comparing the on-chain stablecoin supply with the reported reserve amounts.
As mentioned, these procedures are carried out by independent accounting firms and are designed to ensure that reserves are not only sufficient but also liquid and accessible.
Some verification reports also include details about tools and technologies used to maintain transparency, such as real-time API integration with custodians and on-chain monitoring systems. These advancements are helping to bridge the gap between traditional finance and blockchain, strengthening trust through verifiable, tamper-proof data.
If a verification report shows that a stablecoin issuer does not hold sufficient reserves, the consequences can be severe. Issuers may face:
- Regulatory scrutiny: Non-compliance with financial regulations.
- Market sell-off: A decline in user confidence could lead to mass redemptions.
- Price instability: The stablecoin may lose its 1:1 peg.
These issues highlight the necessity of regular, transparent crypto reserve reports. For example, Tether has faced ongoing criticism for its opaque reserves, prompting calls for greater disclosure. This lack of transparency has also led to Tether being delisted in Europe under the MiCA regulations as exchanges prepare for stricter compliance requirements.
A lack of transparency can also trigger speculation and misinformation, potentially causing unnecessary panic in the market. Therefore, proactive disclosure is not just best practice; it is a business necessity for stablecoin issuers.
While verification reports are crucial, they are not foolproof. Here are some limitations:
- Point-in-time snapshot: Reports only verify reserves as of a specific date.
- No forward-looking assurance: Verification does not predict future solvency.
- Limited operational insights: They typically do not cover risks such as hacking, mismanagement, or liquidity issues.
For instance, the latest USDC verification (as described in this article) confirms the total reserves as of February 4 and February 28, 2025, but does not provide information for March 1 or any day thereafter. Users must be aware of these limitations and avoid equating verification with absolute safety.
This is why combining verification reports with other forms of due diligence, such as reading legal disclaimers, monitoring regulatory updates, and tracking company behavior, is key to responsible crypto participation.
Reading a stablecoin verification report is not just about scanning numbers; it is a critical step in assessing the credibility of digital assets. By understanding how to read verification reports, crypto users can make informed decisions, avoid unnecessary risks, and support projects that prioritize stablecoin compliance and transparency.
As organizations like the AICPA provide clearer frameworks and public pressure for stablecoin disclosure practices increases, the ecosystem is moving toward greater accountability. As regulators ramp up their focus and investors demand more visibility, learning how to navigate crypto verification reports will become an essential skill for all participants in the crypto economy.
Whether you are a retail investor, developer, or institutional participant, mastering these reports helps protect your assets and supports a more transparent and trustworthy crypto future.
Original text: “How to Read a Stablecoin Attestation Report and Its Importance”
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
