Ark Invest Research Report: Staking Ethereum = "Treasury Bonds" in the Crypto Economy

Will the staking yield of ETH become the reference yield for the crypto economy?

Source: Ark Invest

Translation: BitpushNews Mary Liu

Introduction

As Bitcoin solidifies its position as a reliable digital store of value and the only asset with a rules-based monetary policy, Ethereum (the network) and Ether (ETH) (the asset) seem to be gaining momentum with similar potential. In fact, ETH is becoming an institutional-grade asset with yield potential.

As the only truly yield-generating digital asset, ETH appears to have unique and distinct characteristics that make it a "benchmark" within the digital asset space. ETH has already played a key role in both private and public financial markets, influencing the monetary policy of related digital networks and applications, and measuring the health of the broader digital asset ecosystem. The market capitalization of the Ethereum network is approximately $315 billion, with millions of active users each month. As shown in the figure below, the Ethereum network is realizing meaningful economic value.

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, data as of August 15, 2024.

The staking yield of ETH has already influenced other smart contract ledgers, distinguishing it from other digital assets outside of Bitcoin.

Similarly, U.S. Treasury bonds play a critical role in the traditional economy, serving multiple functions: setting benchmark interest rates, acting as a premium store of value during uncertain times, and influencing market expectations about future economic conditions.

Our research indicates that as an asset, ETH is beginning to develop attributes similar to U.S. Treasury bonds within the digital asset space. The yield-generating potential of ETH—and its widespread use as collateral in digital asset trading—is becoming its two most unique and important qualities.

Investors can earn ETH yield by staking ETH to secure the Ethereum ledger. In other words, technically, this yield is not the native yield of the ETH asset. Liquid staking derivatives such as Lido, Rocket Pool, or Frax provide a way to tokenize staked ETH and its yield. Liquid staking allows users to stake their ETH while maintaining liquidity by receiving derivative tokens that represent their staked ETH. Another method called "solo staking" allows for more direct control over staked assets and potentially higher returns, but it locks up ETH.

The goal of this article is to identify and define the unique characteristics of ETH. What makes ETH special? How does it stand out in the broader asset landscape? We aim to answer the following questions:

How does ETH generate yield?
How does miner extractable value (MEV) yield predict economic cycles?
Does ETH have bond-like attributes?
Does staking and re-staking enhance ETH's ability as programmable collateral? If so, how?
Will the staking yield of ETH become the reference yield for the crypto economy? If so, in what sense?
What are the comprehensive attributes of ETH in the standard classification of traditional assets?

1. How does ETH generate yield?

"Proof of Stake" (PoS) is a relatively new "consensus algorithm" that is more energy-efficient than "Proof of Work" (PoW). Why? In PoS, the consensus algorithm selects "validators" based on the number of coins they hold and the amount they are willing to "stake" as collateral—equivalent to "miners" in PoW—to create new blocks and validate transactions. The more staked coins there are, the higher the probability of being selected to build and validate the next block. Therefore, PoS systems do not require massive computational mining power but instead require validators to make significant investments in the network—if they validate fraudulent transactions or violate core protocol rules, they may lose their staked coins. Validator staking can deter fraud, just as the electricity costs paid by Bitcoin miners to participate in the network can deter fraud. Both ensure that each participant acts with economic rationality and integrity.

When the Ethereum network upgraded to Ethereum 2.0, its protocol transitioned from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake. The latest monetary policy update for Ethereum, EIP-1559, introduced a novel fee market structure. These two changes altered the way ETH generates and distributes yield.

The ETH yield is based on the following three factors:

Issuance (≈2.8% APR) + Tips (0.5% APR) + MEV (0.5% APR)

Let’s take a closer look at each component of the yield.

Issuance

As of September 2024, the Ethereum network adds approximately 940,000 ETH annually, which, based on today's staking ratio, corresponds to an annual percentage yield (APY) of about 2.8%. The staking ratio will vary over time based on the amount of ETH staked. If more validators stake, the staking ratio increases, thereby lowering the issuance yield, as the issuance yield is averaged among participating validators based on their weighted stake. Importantly, the Ethereum network guarantees a minimum annual issuance rate of 1.5%, even in the unlikely event that 100% of ETH is staked and there are no transactions on the blockchain. All validators who secure the network through consensus and transaction processing will receive issuance.

Tips

"Tips" are optional fees introduced by the London upgrade and EIP-1559 that users can include in Ethereum transactions. Tips are "priority fees" because they incentivize validators to prioritize processing transactions within blocks.

When users want to send a transaction, they must pay a base fee and can optionally pay tips. The base fee dynamically adjusts based on network congestion, increasing when the network is busier. If users want to speed up their transaction, priority fees or tips are optional. In practice, priority fees are a cost that varies with network usage and congestion levels.

MEV

In addition to Issuance and tips, validators also earn "miner extractable value" (MEV) rewards, or additional profits gained by including, excluding, or reordering transactions in the blocks they generate.

MEV is akin to "payment for order flow" (PFOF) in traditional markets—where high-frequency market makers and traders pay validators extra income to prioritize their transaction flow. Like tips, the yield from MEV is volatile as it depends on the supply and demand for block space and exploits less-informed traders on the network. Importantly, MEV rewards are only available to validators running MEV clients (e.g., MEV Boost).

Base Fee

It is important to note that the base fee (again, the standard cost of sending a transaction) does not impact yield. Instead, it is "burned," providing no direct cash flow to stakers. As part of the EIP 1559 upgrade, the base fee mechanism makes fees more predictable, making the Ethereum network more user-friendly.

Only the base fee and Issuance can change the total supply of ETH. The ETH tokens paid as base fees by users will be permanently removed from the total supply. If the base fee is sufficiently high (greater than 23 gwei in the current market) and the "burn" amount exceeds the network's issuance (940,000 ETH per year), the outstanding total supply of ETH will decrease over time, leading to protocol deflation. Conversely, if the network's issuance exceeds the burned base fees, the network will experience inflation.

These two dynamics support a deflationary trend in ETH supply. First, Ethereum's Proof of Stake (PoS) mechanism allows validators to reduce operating expenses (Opex) and capital expenditures (Capex) associated with running network servers. In other words, the energy and data center costs associated with PoW and ASIC machines do not exist in PoS.

Second, as the premier smart contract platform, the Ethereum network operates with a limit of 14 transactions per second at its core. Thanks to rigorously tested code, Ethereum has attracted the most active developers, the widest range of applications, and the highest settlement value in just nine years of development.

Since transitioning to PoS and implementing EIP 1559 on September 15, 2022, the Ethereum network has acted as a net deflationary asset, averaging a supply reduction of 0.106% per year. If Ethereum had continued to operate on PoW without EIP 1559, the network's supply would have inflated by 3.2% annually, as shown below.

Source: Ultra Sound Money. Data retrieval date is August 15, 2024. Comparison of inflation rates of ETH (PoS) vs. ETH (PoW) vs. BTC (PoW) since the merge.

2. How does miner extractable value (MEV) yield predict economic cycles?

As mentioned above, miner extractable value (MEV) yield is part of the ETH staking yield. In this section, we will delve into MEV, focusing on how it is generated and how it predicts economic activity and market cycles.

MEV is equivalent to payment for order flow (PFOF) in traditional finance, occurring when market makers and high-frequency trading firms pay validators extra fees to bypass the standard Ethereum "Mempool" queue, thereby prioritizing their transaction bundles. Similarly, in traditional finance, companies like Citadel Securities pay platforms such as Robinhood, TD Ameritrade, Charles Schwab, and Fidelity to direct customer order flow in their favor. In fact, MEV originated during the 2017 ETH ICO boom as a basic form of priority "bribery." During the ICO era, participants and investors purchasing tokens for certain projects had to deposit ETH into smart contracts in exchange for the project's native tokens. As they became increasingly popular, token offerings became oversubscribed and operated on a first-come, first-served basis. To be among the first to deposit ETH into these smart contracts, participants would "bribe" validators off-chain.

Like PFOF, MEV often reflects retail trading activity, as market makers are willing to pay higher prices for less-informed orders than for informed ones. Just as PFOF payments are indicators of excessive spending and risk appetite in the retail stock space, MEV plays a similar role in predicting downturns in the Ethereum ecosystem and economic cycles, as shown below.

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from Daytradingz.com and MEV-Explore v1 as of June 9, 2024. For reference only.

While the MEV on Ethereum generates revenue comparable to PFOF in the stock market, the percentage of MEV relative to the total market capitalization of ETH and ERC-20 tokens is significantly higher than that in the U.S. stock market. Since the merge, the proportionate extraction of $790 million annually accounts for 0.20% of ETH's $315 billion market cap. The total market cap of ETH and ERC-20 tokens is approximately $500 billion, with the extracted revenue percentage dropping to 0.15%, still 27 times higher than the $2.891 billion in PFOF revenue, which accounts for 0.0056% of the $50 trillion U.S. stock market. In the early development phase, Ethereum's order routing mechanism was more expensive than traditional financial order routing mechanisms, but it is noteworthy that Ethereum supports a wider variety of order types through smart contracts—such as flash loans, staking, and swaps—along with other interactions with decentralized applications.

Additionally, in traditional finance, other fees and profit centers (brokerage fees, exchange fees, and hedge fund profits) are primary sources of PFOF revenue. These costs are not transparent but are crucial to the overall cost structure of traditional financial transactions.

According to historical PFOF patterns in traditional finance, an increase in PFOF revenue is associated with a rise in retail activity involving less-informed traders, while a decrease in PFOF indicates the opposite.

For example, during the period from 2021 to 2022, as interest rates rose 16 times, Robinhood's PFOF revenue fell by 40% from $974 million to $587 million, signaling the onset of a bear market. The same is true for MEV; from July 2021 to October 2021, the block space used by high-frequency trading firms and MEV bots decreased fivefold before the severe cryptocurrency bear market in 2022, as shown below.

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from Explore.flashbots.net as of August 15, 2024.

Our research indicates that a significant portion of MEV may be extracted and redistributed on Layer 2 in the coming year. Layer 2 refers to secondary protocols built on top of Ethereum. They enhance scalability and efficiency by processing transactions off the main chain while leveraging its security, reducing transaction times and costs.

In the next two years, we expect over 90% of total transactions to occur on Layer 2. To cater to price-sensitive retail investors, Layer 2 is likely to dominate ETH trading activity, capturing a higher proportion of MEV revenue as sorters (or Layer 2 validators) become further decentralized.

Currently, the dominant Layer 2 networks, Arbitrum and Optimism, operate using a single sorter, meaning that block space is not auctioned to the highest bidder. Instead, transactions are sorted on a first-come, first-served basis, and block searchers or builders cannot reorder them.

As a result, certain forms of MEV (maximum extractable value) are impossible, indicating that MEV is significantly lower than it would be in a more advanced state with multiple decentralized sequencers and more mature MEV infrastructure.

MEV yield is a subset of the overall yield of ETH, and it is becoming a reliable indicator of activity and economic cycles on the Ethereum blockchain. Compared to traditional finance, MEV is predominantly driven by retail trading, with a higher proportion of less-informed capital flows, making MEV a measure of activity and economic health that influences ETH's yield in cycles and provides a framework for assessing Layer 1 ledgers.

3. Does ETH have bond-like attributes?

Fixed income assets (especially bonds) have existed for centuries and are one of the most important financial drivers of the economy. Bonds represent loans provided by investors to borrowers (typically corporations or governments). Our research indicates that while not equivalent to sovereign bonds, staked ETH (stETH) possesses characteristics similar to those of sovereign bonds, and these similarities are worth exploring.

The most important similarities and differences between staked ETH and sovereign bonds are as follows:

Bond Components: Sovereign Bonds VS Staked ETH
Issuer: A country's government VS Ethereum network
Principal: Face value of the bond VS Amount of staked ETH
Interest / Coupon: Regular interest payments (usually semi-annually or annually) VS Programmatic staking rewards
Maturity: Fixed term, principal paid at maturity VS Indefinite (ETH remains staked until unstaked)
Liquidity: Bonds traded in the bond market VS Traded on centralized and decentralized exchanges
Collateral: Full trust and credit of the issuing government VS Value and network security of ETH

Note: Regarding the maturity aspect, staked ETH can be unstaked at any time, after which the initially staked amount (referred to as "principal") can be recovered along with any earnings accrued during that period.

When we discuss the comparison between staked ETH and sovereign bonds below, we emphasize that their differences are as important as their similarities. We believe that their risk profiles represent the most significant difference between staked ETH and sovereign bonds.

Credit Risk

Sovereign Bonds: When a government issues debt denominated in local currency, there is a possibility of default, although this risk is lower for stable economies.

Staked ETH: The Ethereum network cannot default on staked ETH because, technically, it is not a debt. Staking rewards are derived programmatically from on-chain activity and network issuance, meaning that yields will fluctuate based on network performance, activity levels, and staking rates.

Inflation Risk

Sovereign Bonds: Inflation of the local currency erodes the value of bond returns, reducing purchasing power.

Staked ETH: There is inflation risk if the issuance rate of new ETH significantly exceeds the burn rate of base fees, leading to an increase in supply that reduces net returns and dilutes the value of interest payments.

Interest Rate Risk

Sovereign Bonds: Changes in interest rates affect bond prices, with rising rates typically leading to falling bond prices.

Staked ETH: While Ethereum itself does not issue multiple bonds (with varying staking yields), changes in yield expectations from other Layer 1 smart contract platforms may affect the perceived value and attractiveness of staked ETH.

Currency Depreciation Risk

Sovereign Bonds: Depreciation of the local currency relative to other currencies can significantly reduce the value of interest payments and principal when converted to other currencies.

Staked ETH: The value of ETH relative to other major cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies may fluctuate, affecting the actual value of staking yields and principal relative to other assets.

Political and Legal Risk

Sovereign Bonds: Changes in government or regulatory regimes may affect bond repayment and could lead to changes in fiscal policy and/or debt restructuring.

Staked ETH: This analogy is less direct. Staked ETH carries additional risks related to network security and governance. If validators behave improperly or collude, staked ETH may be slashed as a penalty, leading to potential losses of principal. Regulatory changes affecting the broader cryptocurrency market may also impact the value and security of staked ETH.

Volatility Risk

Sovereign Bonds: Sovereign bonds are generally viewed as low-risk, low-volatility investments. However, during periods of economic instability or political turmoil, the volatility of bonds may increase significantly.

Staked ETH: Staked ETH is highly volatile as it is still in its nascent stage. Volatility can affect staking yields and the value of principal.

Modeling staked ETH as sovereign bonds requires an understanding of the differences in their respective risk profiles. While both are affected by inflation, interest rate changes, and currency depreciation, the nature of these risks and their impacts may vary significantly. Additionally, staking ETH introduces unique risks related to network security, validator behavior, and smart contract errors, which do not have direct counterparts in traditional sovereign bonds.

Similar to calculating the present value of sovereign bonds, one can attempt to simulate the present value of so-called "staked ETH bonds." This formula would add the present value of each reinvested coupon to the present value of the bond's face value at maturity. By modeling coupon interest against staking ETH yields and discount rates against the risk-free rate of U.S. Treasury bonds, one can derive the present price of staked ETH bonds.

Nevertheless, one of the most important distinctions between sovereign bonds and "staked ETH bonds" is that the yield on staked ETH changes daily. Therefore, modeling "staked ETH bonds" requires calculating the average yield over the maturity period. Furthermore, unlike traditional sovereign bonds, staked ETH can be unstaked or "redeemed" at any time, allowing for the principal to be redeemed at any moment.

Currently, ETH does not have a yield curve, meaning there is no relationship between staking yields and the maturity time of the staked asset. However, based on our research, the ETH yield curve may change in the coming years, increasing its similarity to sovereign bonds, with varying terms and maturities for staked ETH.

4. Will staking and re-staking enhance ETH's position as programmable collateral?

Liquid Staking Derivatives (LSD) are protocols designed to simplify the staking process for users lacking technical expertise. LSD collaborates with trusted node operators to manage staking operations on behalf of users. Users staking ETH through the leading LSD provider, Lido, will receive stETH. stETH is a synthetic version of their staked ETH, functioning similarly to a tokenized proof of deposit. The stETH token automatically readjusts to reflect staking rewards (3.2% APY) and can be converted back to ETH on centralized and decentralized exchanges. The token or proof of deposit can then be used for lending, obtaining leverage, re-staking, and many other financial activities within the digital asset space, particularly in Ethereum-based applications/protocols.

stETH is the yield version of ETH. Due to its programmability and liquidity, stETH is beginning to replace ETH in many DeFi protocols and applications. In fact, stETH has been replacing ETH as the premium collateral in the Ethereum economy. Today, the total amount of stETH supplied as DeFi collateral is approximately 2.7 million, accounting for about 31% of the total stETH supply, as shown below.

Note: The left Y-axis of this third-party chart is measured in dollars (billions). Each abbreviation shown on the right side of the chart represents a different asset.

There are over 80,000 stETH in liquidity pools on leading DEXs (decentralized exchanges) such as Curve, Uniswap, Balancer, and Aerodrome. stETH is a yield-bearing asset that is becoming the preferred collateral due to the capital efficiency it provides to users, liquidity providers, and market makers. Currently, the preferred collateral on Aave V3, Spark, and MakerDao is 1.3 million stETH, 598,000 stETH, and 420,000 stETH, respectively, which are locked in these protocols and used as collateral for issuing loans or cryptocurrency-backed stablecoins, as shown below. Our research indicates that stETH and other liquid staking derivatives are becoming the preferred premium collateral for financial activities within the Ethereum ecosystem.

Note: The left Y-axis of this third-party chart measures the number of stETH, not the dollar amount of stETH. Source: Dune (@lido/stETH collateral compared to other collateral) as of August 15, 2024.

But what if users want to earn higher yields from their staked ETH while providing more utility as collateral?

This is precisely what Eigenlayer (a re-staking protocol) can achieve. To date, Eigenlayer has accumulated $13 billion in tokenized deposits of ETH, accounting for 50% of Lido's TVL and about 4% of the total ETH supply, as shown below. Liquid staking derivative tokens representing staked ETH on the Ethereum network can be re-staked on the Eigenlayer platform, allowing other protocols to enhance their network security for a specified period, a process akin to leasing security services.

Certain protocols have token volatility that is too high to provide reliable network security, and thus may face liquidity shortages and/or need to enhance their security, both of which can be addressed through dual-token staking or renting out their entire securities with more stable collateral (such as ETH). For their security services, re-staking protocols like EigenLayer reward re-stakers just as the Ethereum network pays rewards to validators.

We believe that the emergence of re-staking allows investors to better control their risk and return profiles, thereby enhancing the utility and efficiency of ETH as collateral in DeFi.

The success of EigenLayer indicates a strong interest from users and institutions in utilizing their held ETH in more complex ways. By introducing new use cases, EigenLayer allows participants to retain their held ETH while generating additional yields. As they emerge from the launch of EigenLayer—just as stETH emerged from native staking—liquid re-staking tokens are likely to serve as collateral across various platforms.

Whether in liquidity pools, lending platforms, structured products, or crypto-backed stablecoins, various forms of yield-bearing ETH are poised to become the preferred programmable collateral for leading applications and products in DeFi—whether deployed on Ethereum Layer 1 or any currently available Layer 2.

5. Will ETH staking yields become an endogenous benchmark for the crypto economy?

So far, we have described staked ETH in some ways as an asset similar to sovereign bonds and characterized ETH and its liquid staking derivatives as premium liquid collateral in DeFi, supporting many widely used applications. In this section of the article, we focus on another unique feature of ETH staking yields: their impact on investments in the crypto economy, which our research suggests can be compared to the role of Treasury bonds and federal benchmark rates in the traditional economy.

Today, staking yields influence public and private investments in the digital asset space, much like high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) do in traditional finance. First, ETH yields seem to exert significant pressure on the native yields of competing Layer-1 smart contracts, forcing other blockchains to offer higher rewards to validators in recognition of their security and long-term commitment, as shown below. If the return on investment is unlikely to be higher, why would investors/validators hold and stake riskier, more volatile assets? Importantly, unlike ETH, the yields of other assets often dilute cash flows. In other words, if investors hold and do not stake any other Layer-1 tokens, network inflation will dilute them.

Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from The Staking Explorer as of August 15, 2024.

ETH's staking yield also raises the opportunity cost of holding and borrowing stablecoins. As its native yield rises and becomes a benchmark, the activity, MEV fees, and overall demand for ETH put pressure on multiple DeFi protocols. MakerDAO, Aave, and Compound are three such protocols.

MakerDAO is a protocol for managing the issuance and management of the DAI stablecoin. DAI is issued through collateralized debt positions (CDPs) as users lock up collateral such as ETH or other whitelisted assets to mint DAI. One of the core functions of the MakerDAO protocol is the DAI Savings Rate (DSR), which allows DAI holders to earn interest by locking their DAI in a special smart contract. After DAI faced significant selling pressure and a reduction in circulating supply, MakerDAO governance decided to raise the DSR rate from 5% to 15%.

In money markets like Aave or Compound, where conditions are determined by supply and demand, the returns for supplying/borrowing stablecoins have significantly increased. The supply APY for fiat-backed stablecoins ranges from 5% to over 15%, depending on market conditions. This interest rate reflects investors' willingness to borrow stablecoins while providing ETH or stETH as collateral without needing to sell.

Additionally, protocols like Ethena Labs (which offers a stablecoin backed by spot stETH positions and perpetual futures short positions for spot arbitrage trading) have attracted many stETH holders. Why? The yield offered by Ethena's stablecoin is significantly higher than that of DeFi alternatives, not to mention the ordinary staking yield of ETH.

The yields from ETH staking also affect liquidity mining opportunities. Teams looking to launch new products or features and attract ETH-denominated capital into their liquidity pools must align their incentives with current market conditions. For many teams and protocols, higher staking yields often mean higher user acquisition costs, as potential investors and liquidity providers are more likely to stake ETH for more stable returns rather than take on higher-risk returns associated with new or less mature yield farming opportunities.

Investors allocating funds to early digital assets are all asking the same question: based on risk and liquidity adjustments, will this project provide better investment returns than simply holding and staking ETH during the investment period? We can explore this question with a hypothetical example. How much better must a typical closed-end fund, with an investment horizon of 7 years (the average harvest period for tech startups), perform than ETH after compounding to break even?

If the ETH yield is 4% after 7 years of compounding, then even without considering price appreciation, the closed-end fund must outperform ETH by over 31%.

In other words, early investors in the digital asset space often consider this: based on risk and liquidity adjustments, do the projects they are evaluating offer higher returns than simply holding and staking ETH during the investment period? For example, consider a typical 7-year fund, often referred to as a harvest period, during which investments are expected to mature and provide liquidity. If the same funds were invested in ETH and staked, with an average staking yield of 4%, the project's performance would need to exceed ETH by at least 31% to compensate for the compounding yield effect. In a bull market characterized by oversubscription in private rounds, declining valuation attractiveness, and unfavorable vesting conditions, competition from staked ETH will become even more intense.

6. What are the comprehensive attributes of ETH?

The success of spot Bitcoin ETFs may be attributed to Bitcoin's appreciation potential and higher stability compared to other value storage means, especially fiat currencies. The arbitrary decisions made by monetary authorities (sometimes capricious and inconsistent) have played a significant role in the long-term depreciation of fiat currencies. In contrast, Bitcoin is "rule-based," with its supply mathematically capped at 21 million coins. Thus, Bitcoin is becoming a strong alternative to fiat currencies, representing a digital asset class akin to digital gold.

As a younger asset, ETH has undergone multiple monetary and technological upgrades over the years. Furthermore, its Turing completeness and cash flow yield make it difficult to describe, define, and frame within the boundaries of traditional asset classes.

Robert Greer's paper "What Exactly is an Asset Class" categorizes assets into three types:

Capital Assets: Assets that are productive and increase value for holders in the form of cash flow, such as stocks, bonds, or real estate.

Consumable Assets: Assets that can be consumed or converted into other assets or goods, such as commodities.

Store of Value: Assets that cannot be consumed or converted into other assets or goods but can maintain value over a long period.

In this article, we illustrate the similarities between ETH yields and the yields of debt instruments, particularly sovereign bonds. We have demonstrated that the ETH staking yield serves as a benchmark for smart contract activity and economic cycles in the digital asset space, much like the federal benchmark rate in traditional finance.

Moreover, like any other Layer 1 asset, ETH is a consumable asset used to pay for transactions that are to be recorded on the Ethereum network. This process involves exchanging assets to cover the costs incurred by validators for storing and computing data. We also emphasize the ability of staked ETH to act as a high-quality liquid asset in DeFi, supporting the most popular applications and stablecoins such as DAI and USDe, much like original collateral.

So, what is the best way to classify and define ETH as an asset?

While the Bankless team promotes ETH as a "three-point asset," embodying characteristics of three different asset classes according to Robert Greer's classification, we believe that Bitcoin has already become and will continue to be a very reliable store of value. That said, we also believe that ETH is paving the way for a new hybrid asset. While it exhibits store of value properties in the smart contract economy, what distinguishes ETH from any other digital asset is that it is a programmable asset capable of generating cash flow, making it suitable as premium collateral in financial applications.

ETH and staked ETH are highly liquid and are widely traded on many exchanges. Their liquidity ensures that they can be easily liquidated and converted into other assets and/or used in various DeFi protocols. Although ETH is more volatile than government bonds or real estate, it is one of the most mature, valuable, and widely used cryptocurrencies in the world. With the launch of spot ETH ETFs, the acceptance of ETH may increase, potentially reducing its volatility.

Currently, ETH and its liquid staking derivatives are used as collateral in various DeFi protocols, not only for securing loans but also for participating in liquidity pools, generating yields, and issuing stablecoins. While ETH may not fit neatly into a single asset class, its multifaceted attributes highlight the appeal of this unique asset, making it highly attractive for those looking to participate in the rapidly growing global smart contract economy.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。