Author: Frank, PANews
MEME coin is a dark forest, and the competition is extremely fierce. Countless speculators are competing in it, but it seems difficult for anyone to become a constant winner. In this case, those instances of instant fame seem to be more instructive. For these savvy money addresses, in addition to learning and imitating through copy trading, perhaps we should explore the scientific methods of MEME coin trading through their trading logic and behavior analysis. PANews has compiled a list of 5 typical savvy money addresses in the recent period, attempting to penetrate the secrets behind their trades that have led to success.
Case One: Single-handedly turning a junk project into a gold mine
Savvy money address AcLHpBGUgsRApF2eF3tPPxMsgsnyBAr53mdBvLM8ST8z
On May 16th at 10:42:30, the 1DOL token was created on pump.fun, with only the founder buying 5 SOL in the early stage. This token had only 10 comments on PUMP and almost no trading activity in the 3 days after its creation. The Twitter account associated with the project was suspended. Originally, this was another case of a failed launch. On May 19th at 4:28:18, the founder started selling 1.5 SOL.
On May 19th at 5:39:58, address 4gQYeDooUUHXG6wXDaUR3sL68ZHr2niim2aiZiQNgvGv started buying 13 SOL worth of 1DOL. After the purchase by address 4gQYe, it quickly sparked a buying frenzy in the market. The project's funding within an hour met the price curve progress on Pump and was listed on Raydium.
Subsequently, the market value of 1DOL surged to $20 million, and the holdings of address 4gQYe approached nearly $2.26 million, resulting in a 993x return. According to PANews analysis, this address belongs to a Twitter user named Sunday Funday, a seasoned MEME coin player who had spent 421 SOL participating in the BOME fundraiser, earning approximately $18 million in profits.
According to PANews analysis, Sunday Funday's main approach is to focus on crypto artists. He once stated on Twitter that the success of BOME was due to his understanding of the artists, which led to heavy investment and big profits. Of course, after Sunday Funday's success with BOME, he became a target for many players to track. Therefore, each of his purchases would attract many followers. Although it is unknown whether 1DOL was intentionally pushed to the top or not, the results have forged a new wealth code. However, with the current pool size of only $230,000, Sunday Funday's multimillion-dollar profits are just paper wealth and difficult to cash out.
On social media, many players questioned whether Sunday Funday was an insider trader who obtained high returns by attracting other addresses to buy in. In response to these doubts, Sunday Funday stated, "Did I buy because I believe in the artists? 100%. Did others buy because I bought? Possibly." As of May 21st, Sunday Funday has not sold the tokens.
Case Two: Short-term hunters and long-term lurkers on GME
Address 3zdzNQPcJ4NdEsK2EEHbRMvupVqJPmk94YQyJpMSjPf1 realized a $200,000 profit through GME as a short-term hunter.
Initial purchase: from 2024-05-13 00:05:41 to 2024-05-13 03:13:54, spending approximately $16,000 to buy 18,640,537 GME tokens.
After holding for about 9 hours, they began selling. At this point, the GME price had risen by more than double its cost. The initial sale yielded about $61,000, recovering the cost and achieving a 4x profit.
During their purchase, the GME hype had just begun. Within the time frame of the initial purchase, GME had risen by over 30%. However, this player remained steadfast in their purchase and completed most of the position building within 5 minutes (about 87% of the initial total position).
Address 2nU4GehM5FLtdZcx8BiAHgMFW6ziDJbtFmXsKiwkzUdP is a long-term player who had accumulated 69,400,000 GME tokens from March 5th to May 1st, investing a total of $19,000. They continued to accumulate until May 13th when Roaring Kitty returned and began selling, resulting in a profit of $468,000.
Both of these players achieved high returns through the GME token, but their operating styles were clearly different. From the results, it seems that the long-term player had the upper hand. However, the short-term hunter, 3zdzN, also had similar long-term positioning in tokens, although the price trend was consistently downward. Clearly, short-term trading may be more suitable for address 3zdzN.
Case Three: Winning a $100,000 jackpot like a lottery player
Address 7BBgSsxsjtS8NSZqKZp7qmsoDenupqBaCNZPj8Tvh7g8 (alienbot.sol)
This address's user is like a lottery player, enjoying investing 0.2 to 0.3 SOL in newly launched tokens. Of course, most of the projects end up worthless. Between May 6th and May 8th, this player completed a total of 450 such trades, spending 57.3 SOL (approximately $8,700), with 99% of the projects yielding no return. Only one PumpnDump project succeeded, resulting in a profit of $106,000. Although the media may promote this user as winning $100,000 with 0.3 SOL, the cost behind this $100,000 is not low (alienbot.sol and other associated addresses also follow the same investment strategy, with a total cost far exceeding 57.3 SOL).
Many players on social media questioned whether this address was an insider trading address. However, based on PANews analysis, this player's success may purely be the result of winning the lottery. However, this strategy may not be suitable as an investment plan, especially considering that the number of tokens issued on the Solana chain exceeds 16,000 daily. This trading method may ultimately result in more losses than gains.
Case Four: Suspected potential profits of nearly $10 million from insider trading
Address 5YYaPTFHuW3cgFvgd6oHZy1HgPWGKa59NJKhHVKoMCAX was suspected of being an insider trading address for MANEKI, as it invested over $100,000 in MANEKI just 1 minute after its launch.
MANEKI launch time: 04-22-2024 14:55, purchase time: 04-22-2024 14:56:48, purchasing 718 SOL, accounting for 11% of the total token supply. Subsequently, this address distributed these tokens to 15 other addresses. The current value of the tokens is approximately $9.55 million, while the total funds in the liquidity pool amount to only $15.5 million. After the user's holdings were exposed by @ai_9684xtpa, they have not sold the tokens to date. Insider trading is indeed an important route for many savvy money players, but in the current situation where blockchain tracking tools are very advanced, the behavior of insider trading addresses seems to be difficult to hide in the dark.
Summary:
Snatching the opening is not the choice of savvy money
In the analysis of several savvy money addresses, only a lottery-style player and an insider trading address adopted the approach of snatching the opening. Instead, their choices are more focused on the project initiator or the narrative behind the project.
There are no constant winners, so blindly following is not wise.
After analyzing the savvy money addresses, it was found that almost every savvy money completely changed their capital scale after seizing 1-2 opportunities. In terms of success rate, most of the tokens they bought also ended up worthless. Therefore, blindly following savvy money is not reliable.
- They are lucky, but also boosters
Based on PANews' analysis of the trading scale and timing of these savvy money addresses, it is evident that these addresses are almost never small retail investors. They all have a certain level of investment strength and their purchase scale is not small, usually involving tens of thousands of dollars. Moreover, these savvy money players are the main boosters of the price increase of these MEME coins. For example, Sunday Funday's purchases directly attracted numerous followers for 1DOL. It can be said that their profits may not be solely due to luck, but rather the contribution of their fans behind the scenes.
- Does 10U War God still have a chance?
During the analysis of the addresses, PANews found that there are many addresses with similar or even lower costs than those of the savvy money players. However, these addresses often liquidate their positions in a short period of time, ultimately missing out on significant profits. Therefore, it is not that savvy money players are always lucky, but rather they have their own holding methods in their strategies. For example, they may recover some of their costs after a price increase, or even continue to increase their positions when they see favorable project trends. These habits are quite different from the quick in-and-out habits of ordinary players. For most 10U War Gods, opportunities seem to always exist, but being able to truly seize them is the main obstacle to becoming savvy money.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
