The differences in the details of the cryptocurrency ETFs issued by three institutions and which one investors should choose for purchase and trading are as follows:

Bitcoin and Ethereum Spot ETFs Approved for Listing in Hong Kong

On Wednesday, April 23, the Hong Kong market witnessed a major milestone in the virtual asset field as three asset management companies—Huaxia Fund, ChinaAMC, and Bosera Fund—successfully obtained approval to issue Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETF products in Hong Kong. What are Bitcoin/Ethereum spot ETFs: ⎡They are exchange-traded funds (high-liquidity funds traded like stocks on trading days), mainly anchored to track the price of Bitcoin by holding a large amount of cryptocurrency spot. Similar to gold spot ETFs.⎦.

This type of product made its debut in the Asian market, aiming to provide investors with investment returns closely related to the spot prices of Bitcoin and Ethereum. Virtual asset spot ETFs simplify the investment process and reduce entry barriers. Professional fund management brings standardized investment operations and risk control systems. Investors can trade these ETF products on major securities trading platforms, reducing operational complexity and risk. In addition, these ETF products support physical subscription and redemption, allowing investors to indirectly own Bitcoin by holding ETF shares without worrying about the storage of private keys and asset security issues.

Currently, these ETF products support cash or Bitcoin subscriptions, but operations must be conducted through corresponding accounts in Hong Kong. According to Caixin, based on a joint announcement issued by the Securities and Futures Commission and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority in December 2023, both existing virtual asset futures ETFs and future spot ETFs are not allowed to be sold to retail investors in restricted areas such as mainland China. However, as long as non-permanent residents of Hong Kong hold a Hong Kong identity card and comply with relevant regulations, they also have the opportunity to participate in the trading of these ETF products.

Details of Virtual Asset ETFs Issued by Three Asset Management Companies

Regarding the differences in the cryptocurrency ETFs issued by three institutions and which one investors should choose for purchase and trading, we have compiled detailed information provided by a Hong Kong financial institution for investors to make their choices based on their own situations.

Listing Date and Issue Price:

All three companies' ETF products were listed on the same day, April 30, 2024. As for the initial issue price, both Huaxia Fund and ChinaAMC opened at $1, while Bosera Fund priced it at 0.0001 based on the CME Bitcoin Index price at 4:00 pm Hong Kong time on April 26.

Trading of Shares and Subscription Requirements:

In terms of the quantity of shares traded per lot, Huaxia Fund and ChinaAMC set the threshold at 100 shares, while Bosera Fund set it at 10 shares. As for the minimum subscription quantity, Huaxia Fund and Bosera Fund require a minimum of 10,000 shares, while ChinaAMC requires at least 50,000 shares.

Additional or Redemption Policies:

All three companies support investors to increase or redeem ETF shares with cash or physical assets, providing flexibility for investors.

Trading Currency and Management Fees:

Huaxia Fund supports trading in three currencies: USD, HKD, and RMB, while ChinaAMC and Bosera Fund support USD and HKD. In terms of management fees, Huaxia Fund charges a fee of 0.99%, ChinaAMC does not charge management fees for the first six months, and then charges 0.3%, while Bosera Fund is exempt from fees for the first four months and then charges 0.6%.

Selected Index and Custodian Institution:

All three companies' ETF products have chosen the CME Bitcoin Index as the tracking target to ensure that the performance of the products closely follows the actual dynamics of the Bitcoin market. In terms of custodians, Bank of China (Hong Kong) Trustee Company Limited was selected as the custodian for these ETFs, responsible for asset custody and fund operation supervision. As for the sub-custodian, Huaxia Fund and ChinaAMC chose OSL Digital Securities Limited, while Bosera Fund chose Hash Blockchain, reflecting the different preferences of each company for asset custody and risk management.

The "CME Bitcoin Index" is a specific index that reflects the weighted average price of Bitcoin on different exchanges. The choice of tracking the CME Bitcoin Index for Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs means that these ETFs aim to replicate the performance of the index as accurately as possible, providing investors with investment returns similar to purchasing actual Bitcoin, but in a more convenient and regulated manner.

The "sub-custodian" is usually another financial institution entrusted by the custodian to provide custody services in specific regions or for specific types of assets. Sometimes, due to legal, market practice, or operational efficiency reasons, professional sub-custodians are needed to handle specific custody functions. The primary and sub-custodian arrangement is mainly for managing efficiency and risk diversification, ensuring the security of fund assets and adapting to the needs of different markets.

Trading Platforms, Market Makers, and Participating Securities Firms:

In terms of virtual asset trading platforms, Huaxia Fund and ChinaAMC both chose OSL Exchange, while Bosera Fund chose HashKey Exchange. As for market makers, Huaxia Fund chose Vivienne Court Trading, ChinaAMC chose CMB International, CLSA, and Virtu Financial Singapore, and Bosera Fund's market maker has not been disclosed. Participating securities firms play a key role in the circulation of ETF products. Huaxia Fund and ChinaAMC chose institutions including Victory Securities, Future Assets Securities (Hong Kong), Huaying Oriental (Asia) Holdings, Edelweiss Securities, and Huasheng Capital Securities, while ChinaAMC also selected CMB International.

"Participating Securities Firms (APs)" are usually large financial institutions that work with ETF issuers to handle the subscription and redemption process of ETFs. Participating securities firms can provide a basket of stocks or other assets to the ETF in exchange for newly issued ETF shares, or redeem ETF shares for the assets held by the fund. This process helps ensure that the market price of the ETF is close to its net asset value (NAV) and helps provide liquidity and market efficiency.

Role of Audit Firms:

Finally, to ensure the financial transparency and compliance of the ETFs, Huaxia Fund and ChinaAMC chose PwC as the auditor, while Bosera Fund chose Ernst & Young. Through independent audit processes, auditors ensure the accuracy and truthfulness of the ETF's financial reports.

"Auditors" are independent third parties responsible for auditing the financial statements of ETFs to ensure their fairness, accuracy, and compliance with accounting standards. Auditors can detect and prevent errors and fraudulent activities in financial reports through audits, providing investors with confidence in the financial condition of the ETF. In some jurisdictions, the auditor's audit report is a statutory requirement for disclosing ETF financial information to regulatory authorities and the public.

Asset Management Scale and Number of ETFs Issued:

According to Bloomberg Intelligence, Huaxia Fund has an asset management scale of $55.7 billion in mainland China and has issued 84 ETFs in that region. In Hong Kong, Huaxia Fund manages $3.6 billion in assets and has issued 15 ETFs. ChinaAMC's asset management scale in mainland China has reached $10.3 billion, with 42 ETFs issued, while its asset management scale in Hong Kong is $16 million, with 4 ETFs issued. Bosera Fund's asset management scale in mainland China is slightly higher than ChinaAMC's, at $10.7 billion, with 43 ETFs issued, and its asset management scale in Hong Kong is $40 million, with 6 ETFs issued.

With the increasing popularity of virtual assets, these ETF products in Hong Kong provide new opportunities for global investors and demonstrate Hong Kong's competitiveness in innovative financial products as an international financial center. For investors interested in investing in Bitcoin and Ethereum, these ETF products undoubtedly provide a noteworthy choice.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。