Author: Wintermute

Translation: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: Wintermute releases an industry declaration: The battle for the infrastructure of cryptocurrency has ended, and the next battlefield is not DeFi but machine economy. As AI agents, warehouse robots, and automated experimental systems become economic entities, the underlying assumption of traditional finance that "the opposite is a person" will completely fail - while the difference in cryptocurrency that "the opposite is code" will turn from a flaw into a core advantage. Three notable directions to watch: agent economy layer, physical AI, machine-driven discovery.

Old problems are dead, new problems are emerging

Cryptocurrency has been around for over a decade. L1 has been launched, L2 has followed, DeFi has matured, and stablecoins have become infrastructure. In every track such as exchanges, lending, perpetual contracts, and prediction markets, each category is crowded, and every obvious idea seems to have been done by someone.

So, what else can be built in cryptocurrency?

Many builders gave up here. They were wrong - not because the answer is "none," but because the question itself is wrong.

For most of cryptocurrency's history, the truly interesting question was whether the track could hold: Can it settle in seconds, can it transfer stablecoins at scale, can it operate open networks under real loads? These questions now have answers. The infrastructure is already operational; the next interesting questions lie elsewhere.

What has really changed is everything around the infrastructure. Models can act autonomously rather than just respond; robots learn from human videos instead of relying on handwritten code; open standards for payment and identity are taking shape. None of these are cryptocurrency, but each one impacts the boundaries of financial and trust infrastructure built for humans.

The question worth asking is no longer "What can cryptocurrency do?" but "What does this world need cryptocurrency to do?"

The answer is becoming increasingly clear - machine economy.

Machines are not tools, they are economic entities

When we say "machine economy," we do not refer to machines as tools - the kind used to send emails or write code. Instead, we mean machines as economic entities.

This shift is subtle but has significant consequences. Tools wait for instructions; entities hold context, make decisions, conduct transactions, and act autonomously in digital and physical worlds. Current models are good enough and cheap enough to do this at scale.

Real-world scenarios:

An agent books a flight for you, negotiates prices, pays the merchant, processes refunds - all without your intervention.

A warehouse robot charges by task, takes on jobs, pays for computation, and routes income to the operator.

A research system autonomously designs experiments at night, procures reagents, and runs in a closed loop - with no graduate students present.

Our existing financial and trust infrastructure almost entirely assumes that the opposite side is a person or a business - an entity you can identify and hold accountable. This assumption fails the moment the other side is an autonomous entity, and our current payment, identity, authorization, dispute, and settlement tracks were never built for such situations.

And this exactly lies at the intersection of cryptocurrency, fintech, AI, robotics, and quantum computing.

Why now

Three recent shifts that seemed unlikely a few years ago.

Models can act, not just answer

Models are no longer just answering questions; they can act autonomously, and the cost is low enough to operate unattended. The unit cost of digital work is collapsing, making tasks that were previously not worth a person's time feasible - and at scales and amounts that existing systems were never designed to handle.

Open standards are maturing

Stablecoins are now a true settlement track. Protocols such as x402, MPP, and AP2 provide agents with payment methods. Faster blockchain networks and faster fiat networks are converging in the middle. Open vision-language-action models allow robots to learn from human video and simulations instead of relying on custom programming. Standards enable builders to compose rather than rebuild - this is the reason driving accelerated progress in each category.

Agents can operate continuously

Unlike the tools we are used to - those adapted to narrow, guided usage scenarios - agents hold context and work unattended over extended periods. This changes the economics of automation and the amount of activity that any system must absorb.

Individually, these do not constitute an argument. But together, they do.

Cryptocurrency itself is not dead - it has changed battlefields

When most cryptocurrency founders ask "What else can we build?" they overlook one thing:

The next wave of interesting companies will not be cryptocurrency vs AI or cryptocurrency vs robotics. The founders we are most optimistic about are not choosing between these technologies but are stacking them.

You are no longer just building in the cryptocurrency space. You are building crypto + AI, crypto + robotics, crypto + autonomous science.

Traditional financial tracks are built around human accountability: you can verify identity, contest intent, and hold someone accountable when things go wrong. Cryptocurrency tracks are built around something different: auditable code, on-chain records readable by anyone, network-enforced rules.

When the opposite entity is autonomous, this difference is no longer a flaw - it becomes central. As the volume of machine-driven activities grows, the tracks built by cryptocurrency are better aligned with this demand than those designed for people: open, programmable, permissionless, second-level settlement, identities that do not require intermediaries.

The opportunity for cryptocurrency builders is not to compete with the previous cycle of cryptocurrency builders, but to become the underlying foundation for the next wave of AI, robotics, and physical autonomy.

And the largest platforms are already sprinting. Coinbase, Robinhood, and Binance have each launched agency trading infrastructure in the past few months: agents operate wallets, execute autonomously - Robinhood even built a new chain specifically for this. This is no longer a niche cryptocurrency conversation; it is happening on one of the largest retail user platforms globally.

Today's failure modes

The bet above is: permissionless, programmable tracks are better suited for autonomous entities than those built for people. This bet has yet to be proven at scale, and two failure modes illustrate why there is still more work to be done:

Security: Agent wallets have become an attack surface

In May 2026, an attacker used Morse code-style prompts to inject a transfer instruction that Grok executed automatically - transferring about 150,000 to 200,000 dollars, most of which was subsequently recovered (SlowMist).

Accountability: Who bears the consequences of AI system failures

Even if AI, human reviewers, and governance votes sign off, who is held accountable when an AI-involved system fails remains unresolved. In February 2026, a bug in an AI-assisted smart contract code on Moonwell led to a 1.78 million dollar bad debt event - no link in the review chain captured it (rekt.news).

Three directions Wintermute is optimistic about

Currently, most activities are focused on the component level: foundational models, robotic hardware, stablecoins, exchanges. These markets are crowded and well-funded, and the opportunity is not there.

The opportunity lies in what connects them - a track for transactions, coordination, and trust between machines that do not yet exist. Three directions stand out:

Agent economy layer

The hard part is not whether agents can pay, but: Who holds authority when agents make mistakes? Who bears the fraud risk? How does all this reach merchants without requiring them to rebuild the checkout process?

The form of agency business is still being written: authorization layer, agent identity, neutral routing between tracks, agencies purchasing their own computation/data/access markets. Here, better teams charge fees for authorization and risk reduction rather than sharing in payment value - allowing businesses to be viable even before agents scale arrives.

Physical AI

Robots are gaining capabilities much faster than they are gaining economic scale. A model can now generalize across tasks and different robotic bodies, with non-engineers directing the robots on what to do. But robots still cannot pay for their own computation, charging, or maintenance, nor can they be compensated for the work they do.

What is lacking is not hands, but wallets. We are more focused on structured scenarios - warehouses, logistics, and retail backends - where the economics are feasible, and real deployments exist, rather than home humanoid robots.

Machine-driven discovery

Laboratory orchestration, automated experimental design, closing the loop software between hypotheses and results. Founders building autonomous layers for science have already sold to materials and drug discovery laboratories. Quantum is a wildcard beside this direction: simulation and sensing could leapfrog what can be discovered, and post-quantum security is already a real need at the settlement layer. Difficult to insure, uncertain winners - but there is something here.

R[3]sidency × Construct accelerator

The infrastructure required for the machine economy does not yet exist. This is where the work lies and where Wintermute is looking.

They aim to support founders who see new problems emerging between financial tracks, autonomy, and trust - those who can deliver products on existing tracks while remaining adaptable as standards evolve.

This is the purpose of R[3]sidency × Construct: 8 teams, each with 300,000 dollars, 12 weeks of residency in London, 30+ mentors, London and New York Demo Day. Operated together with top partners: Fabric Ventures, Solana, and Coinbase.

If you are building for a world where machines and humans transact and operate in parallel - they want to support you.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。