MEJ毛毛姐|2026年04月28日 03:21
This response confirms the core problem:
The change was not mainly due to “community feedback.”
It was because Billions told Kaito in March that the 5.6% day-1 launchpad unlock created a major exchange listing obstacle.
That means this was a material issue known in March.
So the real question is:
Why were contributors not informed in March?
Why did the Kaito Launchpad page not update immediately?
Why were users only presented with refund / lock-up options right before TGE?
Also, if Kaito “didn’t agree with it in principle,” why was the amended structure still pushed through Kaito?
A platform cannot say:
“We disagreed in principle,”but still send out the amended terms,still organize the refund/lock-up process,and still expect users to accept the change.
The Polymarket FDV argument is irrelevant to the original commitment.
Users did not contribute based on a floating expected-value model.
Users contributed based on the displayed term:
100% unlock at TGE.
If a major exchange required the change, name the exchange or provide the formal requirement.
If it was not a formal exchange requirement, then “exchange listing obstacle” should not be used to justify changing contributor rights.
Please provide:
The exact March timeline;
The exchange-related requirement;
The legal basis for changing the terms;
The fund custody and transfer records;
The final refund completion deadline;
Confirmation that refunding does not waive user rights.
Refund is not a favor.
It is the minimum remedy after changing the original launchpad terms.
Kaito 老板这条回应,反而确认了几个非常关键的问题。
第一,他承认原始条款确实被改了。
不是用户误解。
第二,他承认 Billions 早在 3 月就告诉 Kaito:5.6% Day 1 Launchpad unlock 会造成 major exchange listing obstacle。
也就是说,改规则的真正原因不是简单的 “community feedback”,而是交易所上市障碍。
第三,他承认 Kaito 参与了方案协商。
这说明 Kaito 不是旁观者,而是参与了退款/锁仓方案的协调方。
第四,他说 Kaito 原则上不同意改条款,但最后还是接受了这个方案。
那问题来了:如果不同意,为什么仍然通过 Kaito 发出改条款和退款通知?
第五,最重要的是:
如果 3 月就知道原始 100% TGE 解锁存在重大问题,为什么没有第一时间通知用户?
为什么 Kaito Launchpad 页面没有及时更新?
为什么用户直到临近 TGE 才被告知,要在退款、6个月锁仓、12个月锁仓之间选择?
Polymarket 上的 FDV 概率,不是修改用户权益的理由。
用户参与时看的不是动态 FDV 预期模型,而是 Kaito 页面展示的核心条款:
100% unlock at TGE。
所以现在真正需要 Kaito 和 Billions 回答的是:
1)是哪家交易所提出上市障碍?
2)这是交易所正式要求,还是项目方自己的判断?
3)Billions 在 3 月具体哪一天通知 Kaito?
4)为什么没有立即通知所有参与者?
5)为什么 Kaito 页面没有同步修改?
6)如果 Kaito 原则上不同意,为什么仍然执行改条款流程?
7)退款最晚什么时候全部完成?
8)退款是否不代表用户放弃追责权利?
9)资金现在在哪里?是否有托管?
10)Kaito 和 Billions 在本次修改条款中的责任边界是什么?
这已经不是情绪问题。
这是重大信息披露、平台责任、用户权益和交易所上市合规问题。
@KaitoAI @Punk9277 @billions_ntwk(MEJ毛毛姐)
分享至:
脈絡
熱門快訊
APP下載
X
Telegram
複製鏈接