Many people believe that the constant argument between ASTEROID on SOL and ASTEROID on ETH will cause damage to both projects. But the truth may be exactly the opposite. It is precisely because of the argument that ASTEROID's popularity can maintain a high level within the circle. Otherwise, many projects end up with only Zhuang's performance, dragging and smashing, without anyone discussing or remembering. So I have always believed that arguing is one of the most effective ways to gain attention. Of course, it's not meaningless low-level tearing. What can truly sustain a quarrel often indicates that there is a narrative, interests, sides, and identity behind it. Top tier memes are often spread not through "clarity", but through controversy. BTC and ETH argue. SOL and ETH are arguing. New assets and old assets argue. East and West are arguing. Community and village disputes. KOLs and KOLs argue. Quarreling itself is a part of the attention market. This is also the reason why I am re examining PROVE. The Anselm wallet controversy is quite interesting. A wallet that has been tracked by GMGN/Axiom/Kolscan for a long time, many people have always assumed it is Ansem's wallet, and tasks such as tracking, reviewing, and copying revolve around it. Ansem came up with a sentence himself: “that's not my wallet lads” This is quite Prove It. In the past, this kind of thing was just a mutual argument on CT, and in the end, whoever had a louder voice won. Now PROVE has directly turned it into a Bounty: Whoever can provide public evidence to prove whether this wallet belongs to Anselm or not, go to Pumpfun GO and submit the evidence. Yesterday, this Bounty was very popular, and many people have already started submitting materials. Someone found it from the GMGN tag. Someone found it from Pumpfun profile. Someone is looking for connections on the chain. Some people also say it may point to another account. But currently the most interesting thing is: This matter has not been fully settled yet. This is the key. Because Prove It is not about blindly taking sides, but about turning the verbal arguments, KOL controversies, and gossip on the CT into a process that can be publicly submitted, discussed, and adjudicated. Previously, arguments were just arguments. Now arguing can become a case. Case can become Bounty. Bounty can attract evidence. Evidence can become a ruling. The ruling will continue to spread. This is what I find interesting about PROVE. It's not just about issuing coins. It's not just about being a community. It's not about creating another voting website that nobody is watching. What it wants to do is productize attention itself. Hot event → Submit case → GO rewards → Community seeks evidence → Official ruling → Generate new spread. If this closed loop runs smoothly, all KOL comments, project commitments, on chain real and fake wallets, profit screenshots, and call records can be thrown into the first round of review. Being stubborn is useless, Prove it。 Of course, as mentioned earlier, this project has obvious high control from the front row, and DEV issues are also present. Don't take it as a perfect project. I bought ideas and operational possibilities. If it can continue to produce this contagious Bounty, PROVE will not just be a Meme, but a Meme court that can continuously consume CT attention. Quarreling is not scary. The scary thing is that after arguing for a long time, no one can turn the controversy into a product. Ansem Wallet Controversy Bounty: https://pump.fun/go/aff13147-3f79-49fb-a6e4-8990ac8914f7 As the saying goes, I'm betting on the idea, and everyone can do it themselves.