After Bitget lost nearly $400 million to a hack, a large amount of funds has once again been transferred through THORChain, but the protocol has refused to provide 'special treatment' for the hacker's address. This has sparked controversy: when THORChain itself faced issues, it was able to quickly shut down the network, but when others are hacked, it emphasizes 'decentralization and protocol neutrality.' Of course, it’s not that simple. While THORChain can shut down the network, it’s much harder to precisely freeze a single address like an exchange can. On the other hand, hacker funds undeniably contribute to trading volume and fees—abnormal transactions over the past few years account for about 8.3% of its historical DEX trading volume, with estimated fees exceeding $12 million. With technical limitations, decentralization principles, and economic interests all tangled together, the issue THORChain faces this time goes beyond just 'whether to help Bitget.'