OpenAI, which is most in line with the US government, has begun to believe that the White House's approach to restricting cutting-edge models is problematic. With the release of GPT 5.6 this time, OpenAI also faced the same problem as Authropic did with Fable5 and Mythos, which is the US government's restrictions on cutting-edge models. The official text states that currently, limited previews are only available to a small group of trusted partners in Codex and API due to US government requirements. OpenAI explicitly stated, "We do not believe that this government access process should become a long-term default practice But this time GPT5.6 also indicates that Sol is currently the strongest network security model, significantly improving the performance efficiency frontier of long-term security tasks. 1) Proficient in identifying vulnerabilities and primitives (in Chromium/Firefox), but unable to generate a complete attack chain and has not crossed the "Cyber Critical" threshold of the Preparedness Framework. 2) Assist defenders in identifying vulnerabilities and patching, while limiting aggressive use. 3) Strengthen real-time protection against high-risk online activities and repeated abuse. As discussed last time when Authropic faced US government control, it is clear that AI is already a strategic asset. The Cold War nuclear weapons of the last century were the trump card, and in this era, AI is the nuclear weapon in the game of nations. 1) The strongest AI models are now officially regarded as strategic technologies, with strict export controls like chips. The purpose is to prevent other countries (obviously led by Tokyo University) from acquiring the most advanced AI capabilities (especially dual-use technologies such as network security and agent capabilities). 2) In fact, this is almost the same as the logic of nuclear non-proliferation: the US government regards the frontier AI capability as a strategic asset that cannot be freely acquired by "foreign forces". 3) In the future, the top-level cutting-edge models of the United States may only be open to "trusted entities" of the United States and its allies (similar to Mythos 5 originally intended for government partners). Commercial companies will be forced to comply with government regulations. Global AI division intensifies: The United States is constrained by export controls and computing power restrictions; Dongda vigorously develops local models and open source routes. The decoupling of the future AI field is also inevitable. OpenAI is also facing this issue today. Previously, Authropic was full of information that it would soon lift restrictions, and the White House was unwilling to talk to Dario Amodei based on the news (believing that he did not care about the White House's concerns). Authropic has now replaced an executive responsible for communication and coordination. This is just the beginning of the game between the government and commercial companies in the field of AI regulation, far from reaching its climax; The core issue is the divergence between believers in technological singularities and the perspectives of political leaders and regulatory authorities. There will be more and more games in the future.