It is said that Anthropic will release another 'god level update' next week The Financial Times has conducted a statistical analysis of the language used by Anthropic and OpenAI on social media, official statements, and articles throughout the year, which has proven Anthropic's "chatterbox". Data shows that in Anthropic's public statements, an average of 5 out of every 1000 words discuss "risk, regulation, or restriction," including 336 mentions of "risk," 121 mentions of "safety," and 128 mentions of "vulnerability. In contrast, the ratio between OpenAI and Sam Altman is only 0.6 words per thousand words, almost 8 times lower. This contrast has led to Anthropic's safety public relations being widely ridiculed by the outside world as' Oppenheimer style marketing '. Sam Altman publicly complained about this routine in his podcast in April this year: "It's like a wonderful marketing campaign, shouting around:" We made a bomb, and now we're going to hit you! " This kind of risk marketing that claims to be "industry safety conscience" ultimately becomes a catalyst for self imposed constraints. Amazon, the major shareholder, betrayed the White House for its own interests and reported the bypass vulnerability of Fable 5, which directly led to the White House implementing a 90 minute ultimatum and a forced offline ban. Ironically, it was precisely because Anthropic had repeatedly compared the risks of AI to an "atomic bomb" in front of politicians, and even boasted about Mythos' "cyber weapon level" destructive power, that the White House naturally killed him in this incident and banned him on the grounds of national security. Dario Amodei's painstaking venture marketing ultimately provided the White House with the most convenient leverage to hit him.