I've been in crypto long enough to know the pattern. Hack happens, Twitter loses its mind for 48 hours, the post-mortem drops, everyone agrees it was preventable, and then the next protocol ships the same vulnerability with a different name. KelpDAO just lost $292 million because one compromised node was all it took to forge a transaction and drain a quarter billion in real assets. Same Lazarus Group that hit Drift for $285 million three weeks earlier. ❗️ Same root problem: security treated as a configuration choice, not a foundation. @Concordium has been building against exactly this failure mode since before it was a headline. Their Protocol-Level Locks define fund movement rules at the base layer itself, not inside a smart contract that can be manipulated by a forged message or a poisoned verifier. The attack surface that swallowed KelpDAO simply wasn't built into Concordium's architecture. With AI agents about to multiply the number of autonomous actors touching on-chain funds by orders of magnitude, this design decision is going to matter a lot more than it does today. Worth following closely 👀(Travladd Crypto 𐤊)