Crypto journalist: US judge shows more sympathy towards Uniswap developers, 'neutral infrastructure' may be key criterion for judgment According to TechFlow, on March 10th, encryption journalist Eleanor Terrett posted on the X platform that reviewing the trial of Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm, it was found that at the time, Judge Failed used a self driving car analogy in the lawsuit against Uniswap by user Nessa Risle, and seemed to have more sympathy for the developers behind Uniswap, while being more strict with the developers behind Tornado Cash. According to materials forwarded by Eleanor Terrett, the judge's view is that holding software developers responsible for the misuse of neutral infrastructure by strangers would be illogical, as Uniswap is considered a "neutral infrastructure," while Tornado Cash is considered to have "participated in illegal financial activities" (knowingly continuing to operate even after being used for money laundering). This statement suggests that US courts may consider whether developers only provide neutral tools rather than participate in illegal activities when determining liability for decentralized finance (DeFi) infrastructure in the future.