In order to find the reason for BTC's recent decline, I searched the English community and found that the debate about BIP-110 in the BTC core community is very intense. In the past, every time there was such a debate, some ancient whale addresses would vote with their feet. I don't know if this is the case this time. I personally definitely support Ordinals. Although the price is not favorable, I am not worried that one day I won't be able to open the regular small picture. It's also great to appreciate it myself. Not necessarily on other public chains, it is said that the daily activity of many second tier public chains has dropped to single digits. The above is published by people. The following is a summary of AI, which has been checked by humans and is basically reliable. BIP-110 mainly revolves around how the Bitcoin protocol handles "non monetary data" (such as arbitrary data used for Ordinals/Inscriptions, etc.) and its potential impact on the long-term robustness and culture of the Bitcoin network. This issue is not only a technical detail debate, but also reflects the community's differences in Bitcoin's mission, decentralization, and governance methods. What is BIP-110? BIP-110 is a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, originally proposed by developer Dathon Ohm at the end of 2025. Its goal is to address the so-called 'junk data/spam' problem by temporarily limiting the amount of data that can be stored in transactions at the consensus layer. Specifically, it reintroduces strict data size limits (such as a maximum output of 34 bytes, OP-RETURN data of 83 bytes, etc.) for approximately one year, allowing the community to evaluate whether a long-term solution is needed. Supporters of this proposal believe that this can: Restricting the storage of large-scale non-financial data on the Bitcoin blockchain (such as some Ordinals objects). Reduce node operating costs, help maintain decentralization, and make Bitcoin more focused on monetary functionality. Why is it being hotly discussed now? 1. Dispute over data abuse (non monetary data/SPAM) In 2025, Bitcoin core developers will remove the original 80 byte data limit of OP-RETURN and allow more arbitrary data to enter the blockchain. This has raised concerns among some people, who believe it will lead to the network becoming more like a universal data storage layer rather than focusing on monetary payments. 2. Community disagreements and governance disputes Some people on Twitter strongly support BIP-110, believing that it can resist the proliferation of "junk data" and contribute to the goal of restoring Bitcoin to "just do money". Others argue that: The risk of changing rules in the consensus layer of BIP-110 is too high, which may affect network reputation. If there is no broad consensus to push for changes, it belongs to "forced pushing" or "mob style" governance. 3. The focus of debate on the viewpoints of core celebrities Prominent figures in the Bitcoin industry, such as Adam Back (CEO of Blockstream), have explicitly opposed BIP-110, stating that it is a potential threat to Bitcoin's stability and reputation, and not the correct way to address "junk data". He believes that even if there is a large amount of data, it is only a "annoyance" and not a security risk, and it is not worth making significant changes in the consensus layer. 4. Node signal and support level Although some nodes (such as those running Bitcoin Knots) have started to signal support for BIP-110, the entire network is still far from reaching consensus. This kind of localized technical support has been widely cited and discussed in community public opinion.