Isn't it just that you don't like to think? This is not embarrassing There is a common sentence pattern called 'Isn't this XX?'? ” Commonly used for some people's sharp and accurate comments on a "new thing". The underlying message is: What's so unusual about this? It's rare to see too many. Smart like me, I can see through the essence at a glance. Your shallow knowledge makes me ashamed. For example, when I shared "Dual Coin Investment" before, someone commented, "Isn't this LP? ” A few days ago, Weituo posted x402 and someone replied, "Isn't this just an inscription This is not uncommon at all, such 'high opinions' are not uncommon. For example, when I found this article about AI painting in "He Cai Tou", someone commented, "Isn't it just a card draw? He Caitou commented that seeing the three words "it's just" immediately makes people lose all desire to communicate. thinking fallacy Essentially, 'no is' belongs to the analogical way of thinking: applying something familiar to oneself to a new thing, reducing mental burden, and quickly understanding new things. That's right, but analogies are not completely equivalent. Analogy is just a crutch, it cannot replace your legs. Similarly, the misuse of the 'no is' mindset has clearly led to the abyss of' lazy thinking '. When you see something new, you always want to apply an old thing that you are familiar with. Without the motivation to further explore, you will always use your own old thinking system to try to explain anything new, and cannot achieve iteration of thinking and cognition. What is the difference between this and elderly people with fixed thinking? Example: Dual currency investment Grid Trading LP Market Making If you are interested, you can ask AI to help you sort out the similarities and differences among these three in detail. At first glance, there are many similarities: earning profits within a predetermined range. But upon closer observation, many differences will be discovered. Dual currency wealth management, with fixed returns and variable losses, with returns coming from royalties; Grid trading, with variable profits and losses, and profits derived from active trading; LP market making has variable returns and losses, and the returns come from passive trading. Seemingly similar, but actually different. Different things naturally apply to different scenarios, and you can freely choose according to your preferences and needs. Blindly claiming that "dual currency wealth management" is "not an LP" or "not a grid" only exposes your half baked knowledge and laziness to think. Of course, you haven't missed anything new either, and you have maintained the illusion of being "cognitively complete" with just one sentence. And there's nothing embarrassing about it.