At present, the black box of VIrtual @ virtualis_io algorithm is quite obvious, as mentioned in the previous tweet. Setting aside the decrease in personal points and profits, the influx of Virtual participants who rely on verbal manipulation to participate in projects is a visible "increase" for the overall ecosystem. Whether it's verbal construction or deep participation with one's own funds, everyone has their own choices. Regardless of the right or wrong investment methods, the bonus points of ecology itself are worth considering. As is well known, the current types of integrals can be roughly divided into two categories one ️⃣ Daily points allocation two ️⃣ Daily active bonus Taking daily point allocation as an example, the four types of VADER, Yapping, Referral, and veVIRTUAL actually correspond to four different groups of people. To be frank, Virtual has now entered its second phase, and I personally believe that VADER has become the "main theme" of the second phase, based on the analysis of VADER's new policies yesterday. When there is a barrier to entry, when VADER becomes a ticket. Its position in the ecological niche has undergone a qualitative change. As @ VaderResearch has stated, I am also a creator, so I value and appreciate the daily work of creators. If Virual is the main theme in the first stage, the importance of changing the ecological niche of VADER in the second stage is self-evident, and both users and project parties benefit from it. It is obvious that after the launch of VADER's plan yesterday, there have been significant changes in the token data of Virtual and VADER, which are actually nodes where new and old users alternate. For Yapping, I saw Vader's response on Twitter yesterday. The current integration algorithm, in addition to referencing Kaito's open protocol, also has Virtual's own algorithm. Seeing this reply, it is easy to understand why Kaito users who are not on the leaderboard have a lot of points, or why their points suddenly doubled one day when they had relatively few points in the previous few days. There are also cases where points are given without updating the tweet. Simply put, Yapping is also a dual mechanism. If Kaito is on the list, there will definitely be a certain amount of base points used for protocol transmission as the base value of Yapping points. At the same time, Virtual has its own algorithm allocation mechanism above this value, which can dynamically balance/intervene in users' acquisition of Yapping points. In fact, it is a good thing for users with lower foundations, as they can earn points through their creations without having to participate in Kaito rankings. Of course, the most important thing in this process is perseverance. Referral is also a relatively new indicator, and of course, there are endless rewards for attracting new members in other projects. For a platform, a continuous stream of new users is the cornerstone of its development. Previously, VIRual relied on self drive, and most users joined Virtual through the community and Vaping. After the launch of Referral two weeks ago, there were more people discussing Virtual. Of course, for users with a large number of accounts, the launch of Referral is also a way to increase "nesting" behavior. Without increasing the existing account base, you can still receive more rewards. After all, the first level recommendation reward is 20%, and the second level recommendation reward is also 5% VeVIRTUAL is the cornerstone of the first stage, and everyone knows that the way to obtain VeVirtual is through staking Virtual. The first stage of Virtual Bulldozer style rise has increased the influx of external markets into the Virtual ecosystem. Under the lock up mechanism, the virtual circulation in the external market decreases and the number of participants increases, resulting in a stable rise in token prices. The daily active bonus can be obtained in two ways one ️⃣ transaction two ️⃣ pledge In fact, there is no objection to trading fraud, it's just that the current mechanism has been changed. More and more people are indeed earning points, and even many projects can earn a large number of points at a very low cost. Everyone knows that the purpose of point trading is to increase market liquidity. The demand for "prosperity" is actually understandable, but would replacing it with LP rewards or changing the weight ratio of point allocation to increase the rewards of new tokens make people feel more "prosperous". Or is it possible for old tokens to undergo a process of survival of the fittest? At the level of pledging, the most discussed topic is "paper wealth", where it seems that there is a lot of profit to be gained, but how much can be left during the yellow lock period. Of course, there are those who brush TP, only doing 2-3 rounds per month. But most users still choose to pledge, and the rewards for staking have not increased significantly. From testing, it can be seen that the price of the token cannot determine the increase in staking points. So the value of users pledging so many tokens as a disguised "lock up" is still worth considering. Although everyone has different operational strategies, the ultimate goal is to 'make a profit'. As a platform, it is obvious that VIRTUAL cannot satisfy everyone. But the principle of buying and leaving is actually understood by everyone, but the differences in the final results and the randomness in the process are not so perfect. For new users, a 'Suoha' strategy is obviously much more advantageous than participating in projects. If encountering some projects with poor quality, the user's sense of participation will be very poor. Of course, I also hope that everyone can find their own path of growth. The road is long and obstructed, and it is worth walking and cherishing!