In the tug-of-war between Wall Street's capital and the White House's policies, Bitcoin is being rewritten simultaneously by two completely different approaches. Bitcoin Treasuries data shows that Fidelity, a traditional giant managing approximately $7.8 trillion in assets, has quietly reached deeper: as of November 11, 2025, as cited by media like Golden Finance, Fidelity has increased its holdings in Bitcoin treasury company Strive (ASST) by 2.35 million shares, about $51 million, bringing its total holdings to 12.24 million shares, about $265.3 million, with the number of shares increased by about 23% at once. This is a typical indirect increase, as Bitcoin does not directly appear on Fidelity's balance sheet, but continues to "weigh in" on the giant's reports through equity in treasury companies. Just a few months ago, in March, the Trump administration chose a completely different path—establishing a strategic Bitcoin reserve for the U.S. through an executive order, concentrating Bitcoin seized in law enforcement actions under the management of the Treasury Department, attempting to incorporate this asset into a national-level reserve narrative. However, former White House cryptocurrency advisor Patrick Witt candidly admitted on the podcast What Bitcoin Did that the president does indeed have an interest in actively purchasing Bitcoin for this reserve, but once it comes to buying on the open market, it would encounter "serious legal issues," and there has yet to be a clear solution or verifiable execution details. On the capital side, Fidelity has already written its exposure to Bitcoin into its holdings structure with real money; on the policy side, Trump's strategic reserve is still trapped between seized assets and legal barriers, and this dislocation is becoming the starting point for understanding the future power landscape of Bitcoin.

Fidelity's $7.8 Trillion Bet on Bitcoin Treasury

While the White House wrestled with whether to buy a Bitcoin on the open market, Wall Street's old giants had already given their answer. According to Bitcoin Treasuries data, as reported by media including Golden Finance and Panews on November 11, 2025, Fidelity, managing about $7.8 trillion in assets, quietly increased its holdings in Strive (ASST) by 2.35 million shares, approximately $51 million, bringing its total holdings to 12.24 million shares, about $265.3 million, with the number of shares increased by about 23%. Within Fidelity's vast asset portfolio, this is merely an insignificant percentage, but in the small and concentrated sector of Bitcoin treasury companies, this constitutes a substantial unilateral increase.

The market interprets this increase as a strong endorsement of the "Bitcoin treasury model," keying in on the fact that Strive's business is centered around holding and managing Bitcoin assets, effectively writing Bitcoin directly into the company's asset structure and then selling risk exposure externally through stock. Fidelity, with hundreds of millions in holdings, signals to other institutions: if it’s difficult to make large purchases of Bitcoin itself within compliance boundaries, first buy shares of publicly listed companies that focus on Bitcoin as a treasury, allowing Bitcoin's price fluctuations and asset properties to be indirectly reflected in this traditional vehicle. When a traditional giant managing $7.8 trillion in assets incorporates and continues to increase holdings in a treasury stock like Strive, Strive is not just a single target; it is being viewed as a tool to indirectly amplify Bitcoin risk exposure in institutional asset allocation.

Bitcoin Treasury Companies: New Alternative Chips on Wall Street

Bitcoin treasury companies, in essence, are publicly listed enterprises that place substantial amounts of Bitcoin on their balance sheets as a core of company value. They are both operational entities and publicly disclosed vehicles for Bitcoin holdings, and their stock prices in the capital markets are often seen as a "comprehensive signal" of the overlay of Bitcoin prices and the company's fundamentals. For traditional brokers and funds, these stocks remain within a familiar framework: still compliant public market equity assets, which can be managed through existing custody, reporting, and risk control systems, just with Bitcoin exposure embedded above the stocks. This positioning allows treasury companies to have a unique category on Wall Street's classification list—no need to rewrite product manuals, while still packaging Bitcoin price fluctuations within a stock that they are accustomed to operating.

Thus, when institutions want to "get closer" to Bitcoin but are unwilling or unable to directly purchase on the spot market, holding stocks of treasury companies becomes a realistic compromise. Bitcoin Treasuries lists Strive (ASST) as a Bitcoin treasury company and specifically tracks its institutional holdings, effectively engraving Strive into the global Bitcoin treasury landscape; as of November 11, 2025, media reports indicate that Fidelity increased its holdings in Strive by 2.35 million shares, about $51 million, raising its total holdings to 12.24 million shares, about $265.3 million, with holdings increased by about 23%. While Trump's strategic Bitcoin reserve remains shackled by "serious legal issues," making it difficult to actively purchase Bitcoin on the open market, Fidelity chooses to move along this map: not touching spot Bitcoin, but ramping up at the treasury company level. The inclusion of Strive in the Bitcoin treasury narrative and its continued accumulation by a giant managing approximately $7.8 trillion in assets symbolizes a clear role shift—it is no longer just a single stock code but is treated as an alternative chip that Wall Street reserves to amplify exposure to Bitcoin while being able to withdraw at any time.

Trump's Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Stuck at Legal Threshold

Compared to Fidelity’s indirect exposure increase through treasury companies, the White House's design is much more direct. In March 2025, Trump signed an executive order establishing a "strategic Bitcoin reserve" at the federal level, with the core goal clearly written: not to have the government snatch funds in the market but first to concentrate Bitcoin seized in various law enforcement actions and hand them over for management by the U.S. Treasury. This means that the starting point for the strategic reserves is not an actively configured balance sheet, but a pile of case assets already in the government's possession, drawn together into the same "national treasury" through administrative orders from accounts scattered across different law enforcement departments.

Also under this configuration, the source of the reserves is locked in seized assets, rather than purchases on the open market. Former White House cryptocurrency advisor Patrick Witt recalled on the podcast What Bitcoin Did that Trump was not satisfied with "passively collecting", he was interested in "purchasing Bitcoin for America through this reserve", but once it involves buying on the open market, it touches on "serious legal issues." Existing reports are limited to this general overview and do not disclose which level of law or which regulatory stance constitutes an obstacle, nor are there any clear verifiable execution details indicating that the strategic reserves have made large-scale purchases on the open market. As of November 11, 2026, this reserve remains a nationally-level attempt based on seized assets, unresolved at the active purchasing level.

Wall Street's Increase vs. White House's Constraints

On one side is Fidelity, a private giant managing about $7.8 trillion in assets, which can independently decide to push funds toward assets with higher Bitcoin exposure within the current regulatory framework: according to Bitcoin Treasuries data, Fidelity increased its holdings in Bitcoin treasury company Strive by 2.35 million shares, with an increase of approximately $51 million, bringing its total holdings to 12.24 million shares, about $265.3 million, with holdings increased by approximately 23%. This is a move that has already materialized and was publicly disclosed by the media on November 11, 2025, indicating that Wall Street capital can quickly absorb global Bitcoin risks into its balance sheet through equity allocation after internal debates within boards and compliance teams. On the other hand, even though the U.S. government established a strategic Bitcoin reserve in March 2025, it mainly relies on seized assets from law enforcement actions; once active purchases on the open market are involved, it has to navigate through multiple legal barriers such as Congressional budgets and public fund usage regulations. Former White House cryptocurrency advisor Patrick Witt even described this as a "serious legal issue", elevating the obstacle from a technical level to a fundamental compliance level.

This misalignment of operational space is changing the way the market prices Bitcoin's long-term narrative: Fidelity's increase belongs to institutional-level decisions that can be included in financial statements and tracked by data sites, with clear transaction chains and defined risk boundaries, allowing investors to infer pathways through which traditional finance continues to deepen Bitcoin exposure via treasury companies. In contrast, the Trump administration's strategic reserve remains trapped in the national-level attempt of "concentrated management of seized assets", with public reports not showing clear, verifiable execution actions at the active purchasing level. In outcome terms, Wall Street is already writing a pragmatic asset story for Bitcoin, while the White House remains constrained in a symbolic reserve narrative, causing the current market's imagination of Bitcoin to revolve more around asset management companies and treasury models than around a national-level buyer that has genuinely completed active purchases.

The Future of Bitcoin Games under the Dislocation of Policies and Capital

When a traditional giant managing about $7.8 trillion in assets boosts its Strive holdings to about 12.24 million shares, $265.3 million, the narrative of Bitcoin "company-held assets" has already been written into asset allocation realities by Wall Street; while on the other side, Trump's strategically established Bitcoin reserve through executive orders remains pinned in a legal framework that centralizes seized asset management, with no clear and verifiable execution details for actively purchasing Bitcoin on the open market. This moving in and out shapes the current Bitcoin narrative: the capital side continues to deepen exposure through indirect channels and treasury models, while the policy side wavers between executive orders and subsequent legislation and regulatory details, leaving room for evolution that could either be intensified or undermined. The future path may gradually clarify legal frameworks to make the government's and institutions' holding methods more institutionalized and transparent, or regulatory tightening could push more funds back to treasury companies and asset management products like Strive to bear Bitcoin risk exposure. Regardless of the direction of evolution, the market will price both institutional buying behavior and policy uncertainty simultaneously, both forming the medium- to long-term risk premium for Bitcoin. What truly deserves sustained attention is how the legal environment and institutional behavior shape each other, rather than a specific piece of good or bad news itself.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。