On the same quote sheet on Wall Street, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase are writing out entirely different answers. Momentum trading experienced one of the largest long liquidations relative to the market in about 40 years last week, with deleveraging indicators described as returning to levels similar to those during the "liberation day" period. The interpretation from JPMorgan's strategist team led by Dubravko Lakos-Bujas is that this round of selloff in U.S. stocks resembles a centralized deleveraging, with pessimism possibly nearing its peak. The sentiment shift from bullish to bearish since June this year provides context for this judgment, thus they remain optimistic about the outlook for U.S. stocks. Meanwhile, on the same timeline, Citigroup chooses to make a statement through actual positions: on November 9, it downgraded the tactical ratings of U.S. stocks, global tech stocks, and European tech stocks from “overweight” to “neutral,” while raising the overall rating of European stocks, excluding the UK, to “overweight,” and warned that the Nasdaq may need to drop another 5% before positions decisively turn bearish, potentially shifting from neutral to net short. The questions of whether sentiment has peaked, whether the AI spending path is clear, and whether to continue adding to the tech sector have formed a clear divergence between JPMorgan and Citigroup, also repositioning crypto assets within the institutional asset allocation framework — when crypto is seen as an extension of high-beta tech and innovative risk assets, the reassessment of weights between U.S. tech and European stocks is not just a tactical adjustment of equity funds, but is reshaping the global risk appetite curve, forcing the "on-chain risk chips" of BTC, ETH, and related tokens to be repriced accordingly.
Citigroup's Tactical Retreat: Fund Signals from U.S. Tech to European Stocks
Amid the momentum collapse and sentiment reversal, Citigroup chose to strike hard at "high-beta tech" on November 9: downgrading the tactical ratings of U.S. stocks, global tech stocks, and European tech stocks from "overweight" to "neutral," while raising the overall rating of European stocks, excluding the UK, to “overweight.” This is not a simple sector rotation, but a dual repricing of region and style: on one side are the high-volatility tech assets represented by the Nasdaq, where Citigroup warned that the index may need to fall another 5% before positions can decisively turn bearish, clearly indicating that Nasdaq positions may slide from neutral to net short; on the other side are the continental markets viewed as having relatively lower valuation pressures and policy uncertainties, which are being increased within the same tactical framework. From a macro perspective, this equates to raising the risk discount rate on the "U.S. tech growth premium," while lowering the European equity risk premium, enabling funds to find a new balance between risk tolerance and regional exposure.
One of the key variables driving this tactical retreat is what Citigroup emphasizes as "weakening AI sentiment": in their view, the midterm election results have heightened market uncertainties regarding future AI spending paths; while still optimistic about AI in the mid-term, they are unwilling to pay high prices for this narrative until sentiment and earnings expectations stabilize again. For on-chain chips regarded as high-beta tech and innovative risk asset extensions, this signals a clear chain: when institutions move from “overweight” U.S. tech to “neutral” and prepare to shift toward net short after further declines in the Nasdaq, it indicates that the risk budget allocated for tech volatility in traditional assets is shrinking. BTC, ETH, and tokens related to AI or infrastructure as extensions of the same risk bucket will face upward pressure on risk premiums and compression of valuation multiples; simultaneously, the tactical "weighting up" of European stocks leads some global funds to redraw lines between "U.S. tech + on-chain high-beta" and "European cash flow assets," with pricing for on-chain risk chips beginning to reflect the risk discount of the U.S. tech sector more than mere growth imagination. This is the true meaning of Citigroup's tactical retreat at the level of the crypto market.
JPMorgan's Sentiment Peak Theory: A Risk Recovery Window Post-Deleveraging
On the same timeline where Citigroup chooses to tactically withdraw from U.S. tech, JPMorgan provides a different narrative. The strategist team led by Dubravko Lakos-Bujas attributes the sharp fluctuations in U.S. stocks last week to a typical deleveraging process — the long momentum strategy experienced the largest liquidation relative to the market in about 40 years, with deleveraging indicators described as returning to levels similar to those during "liberation day." From their perspective, the shift from optimism to pessimism since June has provided the soil for this round of momentum crashes, but this series of forced liquidations do not represent a fundamental collapse but rather a technical cleansing of positions and leverage. Therefore, the current extreme pessimism is closer to an "emotional peak," rather than the start of a downward cycle, indicating that U.S. stocks may in fact begin to present mid-term allocation value under this emotional extreme.
Once this round of selloff is understood as deleveraging rather than a systemic recession, the on-chain risk chips are placed in a completely different story. Over the past few weeks, BTC, ETH, and a basket of high-beta tech-related tokens have been viewed as part of the same momentum risk bucket; as offline long momentum positions were forced to reduce, on-chain leverage was simultaneously contracted. In JPMorgan's view, this deleveraging process is approaching its end, suggesting that the next stage is more likely to see risk re-enter the market — funds shifting from passive defense to actively choosing where to "re-leverage" in high-beta assets. This sketches a clear trading structure for the crypto market: if sentiment truly reverses at the peak of pessimism, the long leverage of on-chain contracts, the risk exposure in the spot market, and the reallocation of BTC, ETH, and tech narrative tokens may very well become the first experimental ground for traditional funds transitioning from deleveraging to risk recovery.
Cooling Tech and AI Narratives: Downward Pressure on Crypto Tech Premiums
As funds prepare to re-enter the risk chip table, they first encounter the cooling of the tech and AI narratives themselves. A viewpoint from Citigroup states that AI market sentiment has significantly weakened; midterm election results have put long-term AI spending paths into question, leading to fluctuating earnings expectations. Under such unstable expectations, Citigroup downgrades global tech stocks and European tech stocks from "overweight” to “neutral," essentially declaring that short-term tech beta is no longer worth leveraging, requiring higher return compensation from investors to continue paying for the "growth story." JPMorgan has also observed a shift in sentiment from bullish to bearish since June; this provides emotional context for this turning point: in a phase where pessimism has not fully repaired and the earnings story is not clear enough, the primary task for tech valuations is no longer expansion, but rather compressing risk premiums.
This chain of sentiment quickly translates to on-chain dynamics. Most institutions typically categorize BTC, ETH, and a group of AI and infrastructure-related tokens as extensions of "tech growth and innovative risk" within their asset allocation frameworks. Now that Citigroup has chosen to tactically downgrade in the tech sector, the tokens within this basket will be re-evaluated simultaneously: the valuation premium of AI concept coins and the growth narrative of computing power and infrastructure tokens will need a recalibrated discount rate under the premise of “no aggressive moves before earnings and sentiment stabilize.” While Citigroup maintains a constructive view on AI in the mid-term, it has clearly stated that it will only turn bullish again when it sees sentiment and earnings expectations stabilize. This "mid-term optimism, short-term caution" attitude means that the risk premiums of on-chain tech narratives are likely to be downward adjusted rather than raised in the short term. Whether they can maintain valuation amid this round of cooling in tech sentiment will directly determine the positions of BTC, ETH, and related tokens in the next phase of the risk recovery cycle.
Rotating from U.S. Stocks to European Stocks: Reflections of Currency and Risk Preference on Chain
When Citigroup raised the overall rating of European stocks excluding the UK to "overweight" while downgrading U.S. stocks and global tech stocks from "overweight" to "neutral," it was essentially providing a new relative value coordinate for global funds: in the short term, dollar-denominated tech growth is no longer the first choice, as high-beta exposure is being directed towards the Eurozone and related regional equities. At the tactical level, this is not "abandoning tech," but rather reallocating the same risk budget from a Nasdaq-style dollar growth narrative to European assets that are relatively superior in terms of valuation and cyclical positioning. The result is that the marginal buying power for U.S. tech stocks has been weakened, while the appeal of European risk assets has been enhanced, causing a shift in currency and regional exposure.
If more institutions reduce allocations to U.S. tech while increasing exposure to European stocks along this path, the first item to be re-evaluated is the budget for dollar-denominated risk assets: the same unit of high-beta capital will prioritize pursuing European stocks marked as "overweight" by Citigroup rather than increasing positions in the Nasdaq and related growth sectors. Given that the main pricing and settlement of the crypto market are still embedded within the dollar system, this rotation from dollar tech stocks to European equities will weaken some marginal dollar buying pressure directed at BTC and ETH — especially from those funds viewing crypto as an extension of tech and innovative risk. At the same time, as part of the global high-beta assets, on-chain chips will be included in the same risk budget sheet: once there is a new recommended column for European stocks in the sheet, the portion of short-term adventurous capital that originally belonged to U.S. tech and crypto will no longer have inherent priority.
In this regional and asset rotation, the roles of BTC and ETH within the global allocation map are being fine-tuned: they are still regarded as amplifiers of tech and innovative risk, yet no longer merely ancillary U.S. tech assets that follow the ups and downs of the Nasdaq, but rather placed alongside European equities in a "high-beta risk basket" for comparative analysis. The tactical logic of withdrawing from U.S. tech while increasing weight on European stocks will prompt institutions to reconsider the uses of on-chain positions — whether to serve as under-utilized alternative tech risks, or as chips likely to be reduced first during overall high-beta compressions. This choice will directly determine whether BTC and ETH are viewed as maintainable global risk exposures in the tug-of-war between U.S. and European stocks or as dollar risk assets that need to be downgraded simultaneously.
Two Paths Amid Divergence: Risk Scenarios for BTC and ETH
On Wall Street, two distinctly different scripts have already unfolded: Citigroup's version is "tech risks continue to deleverage," while JPMorgan's version posits "risk recovery after peak pessimism." The former downgrades U.S., global tech, and European tech from "overweight" to "neutral," warning that the Nasdaq may still need to fall another 5% before positions slide from neutral to net short; the latter, after last week's momentum crash and the largest liquidation in 40 years, judges this round of selloff to be more of a deleveraging, with sentiment shifting from bullish to bearish since June nearing extremes, suggesting that the next step should continue to look favorably on U.S. stocks. Between these two paths, BTC and ETH find themselves caught in the dual narratives of "downgrading tech stocks" and "sentiment nearing peak": if Citigroup's deleveraging script extends, with further declines in the Nasdaq combined with shifts toward short positioning, the high-beta tech basket will continue to compress, motivating institutions to synchronously reduce perceived on-chain chips related to tech and innovation, favoring a trading structure leaning towards reducing spot positions, tightening leverage, and compressing exposures to thematic tokens related to U.S. tech; if JPMorgan's sentiment reversal script prevails, momentum funds, after the selloff, may seek risk exposure again, potentially returning BTC and ETH to the role of "accumulation targets," thus revitalizing multi-asset hedges, cross-market spreads, and thematic rotational trading around them. The variables to monitor are clear: whether the Nasdaq weakens further and whether positions transition from neutral to net short as Citigroup warns, whether the strategic positions post last week's momentum crash actually begin to increase risk, whether the influx of funds into European stocks, after being raised to "overweight," continues, and what direction the overall net flow on-chain points towards under the influence of these forces — whether to risk contraction or risk expansion. These signals will collectively answer one question — whether the next step for BTC and ETH is to be included in a new round of tech risk recovery or to continue serving as chips that get prioritized for reduction amid global high-beta compression.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
