Strive and Strategy, both publicly listed companies that treat Bitcoin as a reserve asset, belong to the leading camp of Bitcoin reserve institutions. Last week, both continued their purchasing actions without interruption: Strive purchased 124 Bitcoins for approximately $10 million at an average price of around $80,526, raising its total holdings to 43,124 Bitcoins; Strategy increased its holdings by 810 Bitcoins during the same time window, with its total Bitcoin holdings rising from 848,517 to 849,327 Bitcoins. In terms of weekly increments, Strategy's increase was already 6.5 times that of Strive, and in terms of total holdings, Strategy's 849,327 Bitcoins far exceeded Strive's 43,124, giving it a stronger indicative presence in institutional buying. More subtly, Strive's CEO Matt Cole acknowledged during the disclosure of this additional 124 Bitcoin purchase that the company's buying pace had "slowed down," while Strategy maintained its high-intensity buying rhythm close to the year's peak. In this context, an unavoidable question arises: Are the Bitcoin purchases of leading institutions shifting from a previously consistent acceleration to a gradual cooling and differentiation in rhythm?

Strive's Slowdown: Behind the 124 High-Value Purchases

Specifically for this purchase, Strive's addition of 124 Bitcoins last week had an average purchase price of about $80,526, with the unit price already positioned above $80,000 in this high range. Based on this average price, the total amount spent in this round of purchases is approximately $10 million, which is not insignificant in absolute value, but in terms of total holdings, it only pushed Strive's total Bitcoin holdings from around 43,000 to 43,124, with an increase of less than 0.3%. In other words, this is a purchase where "price is not a concern" and "scale is deliberately controlled": the company is willing to accumulate positions at a relatively expensive level, but is clearly restrained regarding the quantity of newly added positions.

This is corroborated by CEO Matt Cole's statements on the X platform—when disclosing this transaction, he directly referred to the "slowing pace of buying," but did not provide comparison data from earlier weekly purchases, leaving the public to interpret this "slowing down" in terms of scale and rhythm. After this additional purchase, Strive's total holdings reached 43,124 Bitcoins, significantly smaller than Strategy's current 849,327, but still securing its position in the leading camp of publicly listed companies treating Bitcoin as a reserve asset. Thus, this high-priced, small-scale transaction, coupled with verbal signals of reduced buying speed, appears more like an early sample of a leading institution transitioning from "mindless accumulation" to "rhythm management."

SATS ATM Emerges: Strive's Funding Strategy Shift

Behind this round of additional purchases, the funding structure has quietly changed. Several reports have explicitly mentioned that the approximately $10 million used for buying Bitcoin "mainly comes from the company's existing cash," but Strive also launched its SATS stock market issuance ATM plan for the first time, with all ATM financing this week coming from SATS. For a company that previously relied on its own cash to purchase Bitcoin, shifting from pure cash expenditure to using equity financing tools means that its Bitcoin position is no longer solely tied to operational cash flow and cash on hand, but is now beginning to use secondary market equity as an elastic source, reserving more financial maneuvering space for future purchases.

However, this shift currently seems more like a "structural adjustment" rather than an "aggressive leverage increase." Research briefs have pointed out that the specific amount of financing through the SATS ATM has not been disclosed, making it impossible for outsiders to calculate the actual proportion of equity financing in this round of the 124 Bitcoin purchase, nor can they deduce the marginal changes in Strive's overall balance sheet from it. In the absence of quantifiable details, the more significant implication of this ATM launch is that it signifies Strive's willingness to incorporate equity tools into its Bitcoin funding pool rather than announcing a clear and measurable refinancing path. Therefore, the more reasonable interpretation at this moment is to see the SATS ATM as a signal of Strive's tentative adjustment in Bitcoin funding structure rather than a completed large-scale refinancing turning point.

849,327 Bitcoin Whale Position

Compared to Strive, which is still exploring equity financing paths, Strategy's buying rhythm is clearly more direct. During the past week, Strategy again increased its holdings in the open market by 810 Bitcoins, raising its total holdings from 848,517 to 849,327 Bitcoins. In terms of existing holdings, this position far exceeds Strive's current 43,124 Bitcoins, indicating that among publicly listed companies that also view Bitcoin as a reserve asset, Strategy's leading "whale" status is more indicative, with its weekly increment equating to the entire holdings of many medium and small institutions.

More critically, there is a clear difference in rhythm. As of now, according to data disclosed by Strategy's official website as cited by Foresight News, Strategy's cumulative Bitcoin purchases have reached 176,827 Bitcoins. In the absence of specific details on average purchase prices and sources of funds, this absolute number still sufficiently illustrates its high-intensity accumulation plan for the year. In contrast, Strive is first using the SATS ATM while CEO publicly acknowledges a slowing pace of purchasing, whereas Strategy, with nearly 850,000 Bitcoins in holding, continues to expand its holdings. This difference in rhythm among similar institutions reflects an internal divergence in buying behaviors: one side is beginning to converge in trial exploration of funding structure and rhythm, while the other chooses to maintain large-scale, regular purchases at a high position.

Institutional Buying Thermometer: Who is Hitting the Brake?

In the same "last week" window, the rhythm difference between Strive and Strategy is very intuitive: Strive only added 124 Bitcoins with a purchase scale of about $10 million at an average price of $80,526, with the CEO actively admitting that the "buying pace has slowed down"; while Strategy, within the same time frame, continued to purchase 810 Bitcoins, pushing its total holdings from 848,517 to 849,327, with no "slowing down" signals in its official communications. Looking at net weekly increases, one has shifted from high frequency to "proceeding with reduced volume", while the other has maintained nearly high-intensity accumulation throughout the year. This indicates that the temperature of institutional buying is not uniformly declining but instead shows divergence across different balance sheets.

This difference is further amplified in scale: Strategy currently holds 849,327 Bitcoins, which is an order of magnitude higher than Strive's 43,124. The rhythm of a cumulative 176,827 Bitcoins bought throughout the year also means that each subsequent balance expansion carries far greater significance as a "thermometer" for market sentiment and price expectations than Strive's cautious slow down. The research brief did not provide data on other institutions for the same period, but among the two samples, the larger volume and continuous accumulation by Strategy conveys a signal of "still buying," rather than a uniform narrative of "collective braking."

From Accumulation to Watching: The Next Steps for Institutions

When comparing Strive and Strategy together, one thing can be confirmed: there has not been a consistent retreat in the overall buying by leading holding companies. Strive is using its own cash while also launching the SATS stock market issuance ATM for "diversified funding" for last week's approximately $10 million purchase of 124 Bitcoins, while the CEO explicitly stated the buying pace is slowing down; on the other hand, Strategy continued to increase holdings by 810 Bitcoins within the same week, pushing its holdings to 849,327 Bitcoins, having cumulatively added 176,827 Bitcoins this year, indicating that its expansion effort remains high. In this comparison, it currently looks more like an internal rhythm differentiation among institutions rather than a unidirectional collective withdrawal. It is important to note that the research brief clearly points out that the average purchase price from this round of additional buying by Strategy, specific sources of funds, and the actual amount financed through SATS ATM by Strive were all undisclosed. The public data covers only the "last week" time window, limiting our detailed depiction of the genuine changes in risk preferences for both companies. Moving forward, it will be vital to continue tracking the subsequent disclosures by Strive and Strategy concerning their purchasing frequency and sizes, whether they continue (or amplify) the use of equity financing tools, and the degree of alignment or divergence of these rhythms with Bitcoin price fluctuations and the overall market liquidity environment, as these variables combine to form a meaningful observational framework for the next round of institutional buying directions.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin's exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin's exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。