On October 23, 2026, three seemingly unrelated pieces of information crowded the same screen: HTX and Bitget quotes, the IRYS token price at approximately $0.04/USDT with a 24-hour increase of about 103.5%, a typical small-cap, high-volatility token being lifted by short-term funds in a liquidity-sensitive range to achieve a doubling trend in a single day; on the same day, the U.S. Department of the Treasury proposed rules to implement the COINS Act, intending to further expand restrictions on foreign investment in sensitive technology sectors like artificial intelligence and semiconductors from “countries of concern.” The list and details have not yet been disclosed but clearly point toward a new tightening of technology and cross-border capital; also within this time window, Bloomberg data indicated that South Korea's KOSPI index’s expected price-to-earnings ratio for the next 12 months was squeezed down to 4.2 times, becoming the first benchmark index among the 18 markets with market capitalizations exceeding $1 trillion to fall below the 5 times mark. This drop followed the cooling AI frenzy and accumulated valuation pressure from technology stock sell-offs since mid-year. The tightening regulation and record compression of mainstream stock market valuations together constitute a macro headwind, while small tokens like IRYS still manage to perform “doubling against the wind” on a local stage. Research reports clearly state there is no known evidence of fund-level linkage between the three; therefore, this article will not fabricate a causal chain but will place them on the same screen to observe the global asset pricing differentiation reflected in this local carnival under macro pressure along the lines of risk preference and funding behavior.
IRYS Doubles in a Day: The Resurgence of Small-Cap Speculation
On the same day when macro sentiment tightened overall, the quotes from HTX and Bitget displayed a starkly different line of numbers: IRYS was reported at approximately $0.04/USDT, with a 24-hour increase of about 103.5%, and the data from the two exchanges showed almost no deviation. This is a typical scene of vigorous escalation for small-cap, high-volatility tokens—absolute prices are “cheap,” and the order book is extremely sensitive to incremental funds, with a little buying pushing the K-line into some kind of “story.” Yet, the cold, hard conclusion of the research report is: we know nothing about its market capitalization, circulating supply, transaction volume, or historical price range, and the project background and team information are equally absent, thus we can only view this doubling daily candlestick as a sample of a liquidity-sensitive asset rather than as a packaged “next dark horse.”
The lack of information directly cuts off the narrative path people usually rely on: there are no credible announcements, no verifiable listing rhythm, and no visible community events. Any attribution of the price surge to so-called favorable catalysts can only be seen as post-facto imagination. What is truly visible is only the price itself—the $0.04 face value, the doubling increase, and, under the pressure of macro uncertainty, the preference of retail and speculative funds for such targets: low barriers to entry, huge volatility, and dramatic fluctuations that can be drawn in a short time on account curves. Therefore, IRYS’s trend resembles a litmus test, revealing that even as mainstream stock market valuations are forced to become “cheap” and future expectations of regulatory tightening emerge, funds are still willing to pay up for high volatility in local corners; this obsession with the symbols of “cheap prices and amazing increases” itself reflects a form of short-sighted risk preference.
US Treasury Intensifies Restrictions: AI and Chip Investments Tightened
As IRYS drew a steep curve on the trading screen, the U.S. Treasury simultaneously tightened another end of the valve. On October 23, 2026, the Treasury published proposed rules to implement the COINS Act, adding another layer of lock on top of the existing framework, explicitly stating the intention to expand restrictions on foreign investments in sensitive technologies from “countries of concern.” Under the previous framework, the “countries of concern” primarily covered entities related to China, and this time it was described as “tightening and extending”: not only tightening control over existing sensitive technology categories such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors but also preparing to extend the scope to more countries and technological boundaries, pushing originally targeted restrictions on a few entities toward a broader global technological map.
However, this is merely a rudimentary set of proposed rules still in the discussion phase. The comment period, effective timeline, complete list of countries, and sensitive technology lists have yet to be disclosed, and the market can only speculate about where the future red lines might be under vague outlines. This uncertainty itself constitutes a form of institutional risk: long-term funds, unable to see where regulatory focus will land, can only hedge unknowns through preventive contraction, lowering overall exposure to cross-border technology assets in AI and semiconductors, and shifting cross-border mergers, equity investments, and joint ventures toward a more conservative direction. The result: on one side, local speculative targets display daily doubling performances; on the other side, global technology assets and cross-border capital collectively cool under the shadow of regulation, forcing risk preferences to retract from high positions.
Korean Valuations Drop Below 5 Times: A $1 Trillion Market Under Pressure
In the same year that the U.S. hit the brakes on regulatory measures, the South Korean stock market experienced “loss of speed” in valuations first. Bloomberg data (as cited by the media) shows that the KOSPI index’s expected price-to-earnings ratio for the next 12 months has been pressed down to 4.2 times; this is the first recorded instance of a market with a market capitalization over $1 trillion dropping below the 5 times mark. Earlier this year, none of the benchmark indices among those 18 markets valued over $1 trillion had an expected price-to-earnings ratio below 5 times; South Korea has now become the “outlier” on this list, uniquely standing on the valuation testing ground among the club of global large-cap stocks.
This rare valuation compression is not merely the result of a singular macro data point’s random fluctuation but rather a concentrated realization of narrative reversal. From mid-2026 to October, the global AI frenzy cooled from enthusiasm to contraction, putting continuing selling pressure on Korean tech stocks, and prices initially boosted by high narratives began to undergo dual scrutiny from earnings and interest rates. The collective cooling of tech stocks dragged the expected price-to-earnings ratio for the entire KOSPI down, turning South Korea into a typical case of mainstream tech asset risk repricing globally, and pulling this year’s still relatively optimistic 18 trillion-dollar markets into a reality where risk preferences are simultaneously cooling.
Macro Headwinds and Local Revelries: Funds Sway Between Two Ends
While the KOSPI was being sold off, its expected price-to-earnings ratio was pressed down to 4.2 times, making it the first trillion-dollar market to fall below the 5 times mark, another timeline quietly unfolded in the same window. Around October 23, 2026, the U.S. Treasury proposed rules for implementing the COINS Act, preparing to add another gate on foreign investments in sensitive technology sectors like artificial intelligence and semiconductors from “countries of concern”; on the same day, IRYS, a small-cap, high-volatility token, recorded a price of about $0.04/USDT on HTX and Bitget, with a 24-hour increase of approximately 103.5%, completing a standard short-term doubling against the backdrop of generally cooling macro sentiment. One side sees valuations of a trillion-dollar stock market being squeezed to historically low levels, while the other side witnesses small tokens being instantly pushed up by funds at liquidity-sensitive prices; overlaying this is a regulatory draft targeting cross-border tech capital, and the three clues together do not present a market with a unified direction but rather a slice showcasing the highly differentiated performance of risk assets. Research reports have already clarified that there is no known actual fund-level interlinkage between these three; they cannot be described as driven by the same fund flow but should be viewed as three parallel samples of global risk preference within the same time window.
In such a period of tightening regulation and valuation compression, funding behavior resembles a barbell pulled to the extreme: on one end, institutional and long-term funds gradually reduce exposure to tech and cross-border assets heavily affected by policies, shifting mainstream stock market positions toward “more regulatory-resistant and more visible profitability”; on the other end, retail and speculative funds seek high-leverage emotional outlets in small-cap, high-volatility tokens like IRYS, attempting to use short-term trends to amplify the elastic returns of micro positions, while unable to control the macro headwinds. The oscillation of funds at both ends does not simply reflect warming or cooling of risk preferences; rather, it represents a split choice between defending mainstream assets and betting on extreme volatility in marginal targets, and this choice itself is a clear annotation of the current global risk cycle.
Outlook: How Far Can Crypto Speculation Journey Through the Regulatory Cycle?
Pulling the perspective back to the window of October 23, 2026: on one side, the U.S. Treasury throws out proposed rules for the COINS Act, preparing to tighten foreign investment in sensitive technologies like artificial intelligence and semiconductors aimed at “countries of concern” on the existing framework; on the other side, South Korea's KOSPI sees its expected price-to-earnings ratio drop to 4.2 times, becoming the first market over $1 trillion to breach the 5 times mark. Amid the narrative of cooling the AI frenzy and selling tech stocks, the valuation of the mainstream stock market has rarely been compressed. Paralleled to this is the record of small-cap tokens like IRYS on the same day at about $0.04/USDT with a 24-hour increase of approximately 103.5%, with emotional funding creating a short-term “prosperity” on local targets entirely opposite to macro headwinds. However, within this narrative thread, the information boundaries are exceedingly clear: we do not know the reliable fundamentals and driving data of IRYS, the COINS Act remains in the proposal stage, key terms and effective timelines are yet to be finalized, and the KOSPI's level and detailed drops also lack public detail. Hence, any attempt to package a single event as a definitive trend signal exceeds the factual basis for risk betting. In a cycle of tightening regulation and valuation reassessment delays, global funds will likely continue to perform short-term switches between safe assets and high-volatility tokens, the extreme sensitivity of small-cap tokens to liquidity and sentiment will simultaneously amplify both gains and losses, and how far they can truly go does not depend on a single price surge but on participants’ willingness to equip this model with sufficiently rigorous risk management and continuous checks on the authenticity of information.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
On-chain Twitter for AiCoin: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
