According to a single media source reporting on September 7, 2026, Macquarie has advanced its assumption regarding the Federal Reserve's policy path from "first rate hike of 25 basis points in December 2026" to "25 basis points rate hike in September 2026 and another 25 basis points in the first quarter of 2027," effectively moving the overall pace forward by about a quarter, creating a scenario that is relatively more hawkish compared to the current mainstream market focus on "when the interest rate cut cycle will end or pause." It is important to emphasize that this information has not yet been verified through Macquarie's original report or corroborated by a second independent source; it is more of a path assumption for market participants to include in scenario analysis rather than a consensus conclusion. However, even at the expectation level, the "advancement + consecutive 25 basis points hikes" already implies an earlier elevation of future policy rates and a faster increase in discount rates, potentially exerting pressure on the valuations of high-beta risk assets that are sensitive to interest rates. For assets such as BTC and ETH, which are highly correlated with USD liquidity and interest rate expectations, if this advanced rate hike path becomes progressively incorporated into the price in the interest rate curve, it will directly prompt investors to reassess future on-chain funding costs and risk preference premiums, signaling a noteworthy inflection point for the overall liquidity and pricing logic of the cryptocurrency market.
Investment Banks’ Hawkish Surprise: Rate Hike Window Advanced by a Quarter
In terms of path setting, Macquarie has moved the first rate hike from December 2026 to September 2026 and maintained a two-step rhythm of another 25 basis points hike in the first quarter of 2027, indicating that the interest rate trajectory it depicts not only rises earlier but is also "steeper" on the timeline: the upward segment of the policy rate is initiated a quarter earlier, and the peak is compressed forward in the time dimension. For a market still discussing "when the interest rate cut cycle will end or pause," this amounts to inserting an early resumption of rate hikes at the current conclusion stage, forcibly shifting some investors' focus from "the last few cuts" to "when the next rate hike inflection point will arrive," creating repricing pressure on future policy rate ranges, where the terminal rate might settle, and the time window for a formal policy shift.
At the interest rate pricing level, such hawkish adjustments from investment banks usually first affect the distribution of interest rate expectations rather than immediately changing the consensus itself: short-end interest rate expectations may be raised in scenario analyses, the assumed terminal rate range may be widened in models, and the probability weights of the policy shift timing may shift, subsequently transmitting through discount rate assumptions to the valuations of high-beta assets, including BTC, ETH, and other varieties that are highly sensitive to changes in USD interest rates and liquidity. It is important to note that this path is currently based solely on a single media report dated September 7, 2026, and has not been corroborated by Macquarie's original report or a secondary independent source. Therefore, in a trading framework, it is more suitable to regard it as a "hawkish branch" to be included rather than the baseline scenario, used to test one's sensitivity to interest rate curves, risk preferences, and cryptocurrency asset valuations.
Interest Rates Rising Ahead: Pressures on Risk Asset Valuations
In the scenario where Macquarie moves the first rate hike time from December 2026 to September 2026, the 25 basis point hike first alters the expected level of risk-free short-term interest rates and transmits to medium- to long-term interest rates via expectation pricing. For equities, especially technology stocks that rely on long-term profitability and growth assumptions, an earlier and higher policy interest rate path will directly elevate discount rates, compressing the present value range of future cash flows and forcing the reasonable upper limits of valuation models such as price-to-earnings and price-to-sales ratios to decline. The same logic applies to BTC and ETH, considered high-beta and long-duration risk assets: their pricing is highly reliant on narratives surrounding future liquidity environments and adoption growth, and when the overall interest rate curve shifts upward, the "story premium" afforded to such assets theoretically needs to be discounted.
Expectations for an earlier rate hike also mean that the cost of leveraged funds will enter an upward channel sooner in the next two years. Higher funding rates will increase the costs of off-exchange credit financing and on-exchange margin trading, weakening the risk tolerance of highly leveraged speculative funds in equities and the cryptocurrency market, and exerting pressure on trading structures that rely on leverage and re-pledging chains. In this hawkish branch scenario, even if current prices have not yet shown verifiable immediate responses, asset classes with high volatility and long durations—from growth stocks to BTC and ETH—will need to face dual valuation reassessment pressures from rising funding costs and discount rates, meaning that long-duration risk assets are under greater downward reassessment pressure both in pricing and positioning.
Liquidity Peak Warning: Cryptocurrency Funds May Withdraw Before Attacking
In the scenario where Macquarie moves the first rate hike from December 2026 to September 2026, the market’s timeline for the peak of dollar liquidity would shift forward as a whole. Rate hikes are typically seen as a sign that the monetary environment is shifting from loose or neutral to somewhat tight, and once institutions advance the timing of "beginning to tighten" by a quarter in their valuation models, interest rate curves and discount rate paths rise accordingly. Funds will view the current phase as an "approaching peak of liquidity" rather than still being in the tail end of easing. This shift does not need to wait for the actual rate hikes to take place before market pricing reacts; historical experience shows that risk assets often see amplified volatility and reallocation of positions in the expectation tightening phase rather than adjusting only when policies truly shift.
In the cryptocurrency market, such scenarios of tightening typically correspond to a two-step process: first contraction, then assault. The first step involves reducing positions in high-beta tokens and compressing durations—funds will flow from the high volatility altcoin sectors back to higher liquidity and market cap assets like BTC and ETH while increasing the weights of USD-denominated assets and on-chain cash to prepare for potential future cost increases and pullback risks. The second step would be to choose whether to expand risk exposure again based on actual policy trajectories and price adjustments once new expectations for interest rates and liquidity stabilize. Currently, the briefing clearly states that there is no on-chain or funding flow data suggesting that this prediction has triggered massive migration of cryptocurrency funds, thus the above is more based on common macro theories and behavioral patterns from past cycles. The key to watch next is whether this "liquidity peak" expectation will be adopted by more institutions and implemented in asset allocation.
Two Narratives for BTC and ETH Under the Shadow of Rate Hikes
In the scenario of Macquarie's earlier rate hike, the main narrative for BTC is closer to gold: Its pricing is often more sensitive to expectations of real interest rates and dollar liquidity than to any individual economic data response. If the policy rates rise earlier beginning in September 2026 and real interest rates increase, traditional macro frameworks would expect gold and "digital gold" to face valuation pressures from rising discount rates. However, simultaneously, when risk assets are generally under pressure, some funds may view BTC as a hedge against fiat currency credit and long-term inflation risks, thus creating a dual force struggle of "interest rate suppression—credit worry support" during surges in risk aversion. Historically, both gold and certain crypto assets have exhibited directional pressure in response to rising real interest rates during rate hike and balance sheet reduction phases, indicating that under the current hawkish scenario, traders need to dissect BTC's different elasticities to interest rates and credit risks more intricately.
ETH, on the other hand, typically occupies two storylines of "technology growth + on-chain cash flow." If Macquarie's interest rate hike assumptions for 2026 and 2027 are incorporated into more institutional asset allocation models, this will directly raise discount rates, resulting in valuation pressures akin to traditional growth stocks on those based on future technological iterations and application expansions. Meanwhile, the narrative around ETH's transaction fees and staking rewards relates to on-chain returns, and its relative attractiveness would be re-evaluated against expectations of risk-free interest rates, as funds re-select between the yield curves of "on-chain returns" and "USD rates." Due to the briefing not providing current ETH valuation data or specific on-chain yield information, pricing discussions can only remain at the structural level: In the short term, it is essential to reflect the impacts of liquidity tightening and discount rate rises, while in the long term, it is necessary to evaluate whether network effects, adoption paths, and on-chain cash flows can maintain premiums in higher interest rate environments. Traders must clearly delineate weight distributions between these two main lines when building BTC and ETH positions and accept the macro assumptions that underpin them.
From Predictions to Positions: Which Macro Signals to Focus On Now
Before integrating Macquarie's "advance to a 25bp hike in September 2026 + another 25bp in the first quarter of 2027" path into trading frameworks, the first step is signal stratification. Currently, this prediction has only been reported by the media on September 7, 2026, and has not been corroborated with the original report or second source validation, so it can only be seen as one of many scenarios rather than the baseline hypothesis. In terms of position decision-making, higher weight should be assigned to the Federal Reserve's official communications: the median path provided in the dot plot, the central debates disclosed in meeting minutes, and the language changes from the chair and voting members regarding "when the interest rate cut cycle will end, and when to consider raising rates again," all serve as key anchors for calibrating the reasonableness of the Macquarie scenario. Additionally, inflation and employment data, the shapes of nominal and real interest rate curves, changes in dollar funding costs, and credit spreads will determine whether the earlier rate hike is feasible within broader macro conditions, thus affecting how much probability the market is willing to assign to this path.
The second step is to place this hawkish scenario within a multi-path framework rather than making a single-point bet. The current briefing has not provided public data from other investment banks regarding the timing of rate hikes in 2026, so traders can only construct a baseline path on the "official dot plot + historical behavior patterns," treating Macquarie's early rate hike as an upside risk scenario and comparing the valuation elasticity and pressure on on-chain funding of BTC and ETH against USD-denominated anchor assets under different scenarios. In practice, scenario analysis and stress testing can be used to adjust positions: setting an interest rate trajectory of "entering a rate hike cycle in the second half of 2026" at the portfolio level, assessing the impacts on the discount rates for crypto assets, USD liquidity, and risk preferences, and evaluating whether current exposures are overly betting on continued easing rather than taking directional heavy positions based on Macquarie's timeline. The more reasonable approach at this stage is to treat "early rate hikes" as a macro risk factor to be continuously monitored, dynamically adjusting scenario weights and position exposures around evolving interest rate path expectations, Fed communications, and key data.
Join our community to discuss together and become stronger!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
