Rune did not ignite this market trend in the boardroom but pressed the "publish" button on Claude-generated content on X. The tweet, which he later referred to as "AI junk content," claimed he spent approximately $1.8 million to acquire about 37.4% of the Nasdaq-listed agricultural product company Farmmi (FAMI) and planned to tokenize this equity on the Robinhood Chain, creating a "RWA+Meme" narrative tied to on-chain FAMI and JINQIAN. The narrative quickly spread on social media, and according to single-source reports from GMGN, Binance, MSX.COM, etc., FAMI surged over 300% during trading, peaking at around $0.50 before retracting to about $0.18-$0.23, with the gains narrowing to approximately 50%; on-chain, according to GMGN, FAMI's token market cap briefly soared to around $107 million, then plummeted back to the $20-$30 million range within hours, frequently testing the $25 million and even $15 million levels; under the same source's standard, JINQIAN and FAMI (referred to as FAMIJINQIAN in the text) fell from their peaks by more than 79% and 71%, respectively, creating a bubble of coin and stock linkage ignited by narrative and punctured by the same narrative. On September 2, 2026, Rune repeatedly clarified that this idea of "acquiring a Nasdaq company and tokenizing equity" originated entirely from a post generated by Claude, with figures such as funding and equity percentages being fabricated or exaggerated, and no real evidence of technical or legal equity mapping found in the factual databases, clearly exposing two main lines of the incident: one is that the current meme market can be pushed to a near billion-dollar valuation by a narrative within hours, despite lacking fundamental support, and the other is that when the narrative source comes from unverified AI text, the boundary between true and false information becomes blurred, and market participants are paying the price for this new uncertainty.

AI Acquisition Post Ignites: US Stocks FAMI and On-Chain Tokens Surge

The ignition of the story was still that post attached to "acquiring a Nasdaq-listed company." As a crypto trader and KOL, Rune directly presented a concept generated by Claude: claiming he spent approximately $1.8 million to acquire about 37.4% of Farmmi (FAMI), and then planned to tokenize this equity on the Robinhood Chain, while also issuing meme tokens related to FAMI and JINQIAN. The post packaged this low-market-cap Nasdaq company as a real-world asset that could be "sliced, put on-chain, and minted," forcing US stocks FAMI and on-chain FAMI, JINQIAN into the same "RWA+Meme" narrative. Afterward, Rune emphasized repeatedly on September 2 that these figures were fabricated or exaggerated, describing the post as "AI junk content," but in the few hours after the narrative was released and before it was debunked, it was regarded as one of the core sources of this market trend, enough to let emotions lead facts.

The narrative spread rapidly: according to data from single sources like GMGN, Binance, and MSX.COM, driven by retweets on social media and trading groups, US stock FAMI surged over 300% intraday, topping nearly $0.50; almost synchronously, the market caps of FAMI and JINQIAN on the Robinhood Chain rapidly soared, with on-chain FAMI once pushed to a market cap of about $107 million according to GMGN data. This was not a traditional "fundamental improvement," but rather a collective bet in the market on the imagination that "I am buying a Nasdaq company's on-chain equity while playing with a new meme," with coin and stock resonating upward under the same storyline. Ironically, factual databases clearly pointed out that currently, there is no technical or legal evidence proving the true binding between US stock FAMI and on-chain FAMI, and the so-called RWA mapping merely resides in Rune's AI post but was already enough to ignite a cross-market frenzy in a short time.

From One Hundred Million to Fifteen Million: The Rapid Collapse of Meme Market Value

The story ignited as quickly as the pullback came harshly. According to single-source data from GMGN, after Rune's "acquisition + on-chain equity" narrative spread, the market cap of on-chain FAMI was once pushed to approximately $107 million, regarded as a high point of "over a hundred million market cap." However, this high point lasted only a very short time, and then the market cap rapidly slipped to the $20-$30 million range, repeatedly dropping below the $25 million and even the $15 million mark, with an overall decline of more than 70%; the narrative-bound JINQIAN, according to similarly sourced data from GMGN, saw its market cap drop to about $15.04 million in the retraction phase, declining over 79% from its high point, while the token marked as FAMI (FAMIJINQIAN) also plummeted to around $15.35 million, down over 71% from its peak. Almost within the same hour, US stock FAMI pulled back intraday from around $0.50 to about $0.18-$0.23, with gains that had once exceeded 300% quickly narrowing to around 50%. It is important to emphasize that these figures all come from single-source reported point-in-time data, and specific values at different time snapshots vary, having not undergone cross-verification, and can only reflect the recorded market outline at the time.

In this outline, "from one hundred million to fifteen million" is not a result of fundamental deterioration but more like a speedometer of sentiment reversal. On-chain FAMI and JINQIAN are difficult to classify as assets supported by clear cash flows or compliant equity structures; they almost entirely rely on the storyline provided by Rune's AI post of "Nasdaq equity on-chain + Meme" to maintain valuation imagination. Once the market begins to question the authenticity of the acquisition and equity tokenization, the narrative loses credibility, and emotion-driven buying immediately rushes to the exit, with liquidity withdrawal rapidly amplifying into a cliff-like market cap drop. This extreme swing from a surge to a collapse directly exposes the structural risk that the current meme tokens are highly narrative-driven and lack robust intrinsic value support.

Rune Admits AI Junk Content: Confidence Reversal Triggers a Stampede

The real turning point occurred on September 2. On that day, Rune repeatedly posted "clarifications" on X, personally dismantling the story that ignited the coin-stock linkage market: he admitted that the so-called "acquisition of a Nasdaq-listed company and tokenization of equity on the Robinhood Chain" was essentially just a post generated by Claude and not a real plan in progress. More critically, he described that post as "AI junk content," clearly stating that details regarding the $1.8 million investment and the 37.4% equity ratio were all fabricated or exaggerated. Defining the narrative source as "AI junk" effectively told the market that all the carefully stitched-together "RWA+Meme" imaginations stood on a non-existent foundation.

This self-exposure caused a sharp reversal of identity roles within a few hours: from being viewed by many as "the party willing to bottom-fish and tokenize on-chain in Nasdaq," it turned into an individual openly admitting to having published AI-generated junk content, with narrative credibility nearly instantaneously reduced to zero. According to single-source data, on the day of the clarification, US stock FAMI along with on-chain FAMI and JINQIAN continued to fluctuate violently and significantly declined; the rapid downturn in prices and market value was not due to a sudden deterioration in fundamentals, but because the storyline supporting the upswing was shattered by the party involved. In a structure of information asymmetry, the storyteller holds the source fact that "this is just AI generated," while followers can only make decisions based on second-hand narratives from social media when chasing high prices; once the narrative is falsified, those who see the clarification first flee, while late-comers are swept into a stampede-type sell-off, ultimately bearing the volatility costs collectively, paying the price for this AI acquisition lie.

Narrative-Driven Meme Games and Regulatory Shadows

This coin-stock linkage frenzy is essentially a meme game ignited by a story. The factual database has classified the incident as "A coin-stock linkage meme market triggered by a crypto KOL publishing AI-generated content": in the absence of any real equity binding or asset mapping, US stock FAMI once surged over 300% intraday according to single-source data from GMGN, Binance, MSX.COM, while on-chain FAMI and JINQIAN's market cap also spiked, before retracing more than 70% and nearly 80% from their high points, respectively. The entire process lacked new cash flow or clear asset support, with pricing almost entirely revolving around the narrative expectations and emotional fluctuations of "RWA+Meme" until Rune admitted that the so-called acquisition and equity tokenization concept was merely "AI junk content" generated by Claude, the market then swiftly switched from excitement to panic, pulling the prices back to levels without narrative enhancement.

AI plays a role as a very sharp double-edged sword. For Rune, Claude generated what seemed like a professional acquisition announcement and investment analysis at almost zero cost, instantly enhancing the narrative's credibility and dissemination efficiency with fabricated or exaggerated figures like "$1.8 million" and "37.4% equity"; for followers, however, this enhanced text amplified the risk of misinformation, directly entering the trading decision chain in an environment lacking fact verification. The more sensitive aspect is that the narrative targeted Nasdaq-listed company FAMI; such false acquisition statements may theoretically touch upon securities law provisions regarding false statements. Even though the factual database has not recorded any ongoing investigations or sanctions, it is sufficient for regulators to view it as a new sample of "AI-generated content manipulating or disturbing the market," forcing the entire industry to confront a reality: as AI lowers the barriers to storytelling, the more prices depend on narratives and emotions, the more the market must incur higher institutional costs for distinguishing truth from falsehood and determining accountability boundaries.

What Retail Investors Should Learn After the Meme-Stock Frenzy in the AI Era

Returning to the beginning and end of this round of coin-stock linkage, it is essentially just a post generated by Claude, which even the author later referred to as "AI junk content": fabricating a $1.8 million investment and exaggerating a 37.4% equity stake, forcibly squeezing Nasdaq-listed company FAMI, on-chain FAMI, and JINQIAN into one "RWA+Meme" story. In the most fervent hours, according to single-source data, the market cap of on-chain FAMI was pushed to about $107 million, before plummeting alongside JINQIAN to about $15 million-$30 million, with nearly one hundred million in market value rapidly created and subsequently destroyed under the same narrative. For average investors, the first lesson is to recognize the fragility of data: market performance, holdings, acquisition amounts, equity ratios—any claims seen only in single screenshots or from single data sources must raise a question mark in one's mind, especially since factual databases have repeatedly emphasized that all price data is only single-source information recorded at reporting points. The second lesson is to distinguish "assets in the story" from "real-world assets." There is currently no technical or legal evidence to show that US stock FAMI's equity has been genuinely acquired or tokenized on-chain; the so-called "equity on-chain" and "company acquired" are merely narratives in this incident, not verifiable rights certificates. The third lesson is to maintain high vigilance regarding coin-stock linkages: when a story ignites both on-chain tokens and US stock movements simultaneously, retail investors often mistakenly regard "market resonance" as "fact endorsement," forgetting that even the narrative source has not conducted basic self-examination of AI-generated content. In an era where AI significantly participates in information production, the barrier to storytelling has been lowered to the minimum, while the costs of mixed truths and falsehoods are continuously rising. This implies that on one end, regulators may use such incidents as samples to strengthen constraints on KOLs and cross-market narratives, while on the other end, stricter data disclosure and mutual verification mechanisms are gradually forming within the market. If retail investors cannot cultivate critical thinking starting from doubt amid this, they will continue to be the first to bear the costs of high-frequency narratives and extreme volatility in the next round.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。