In the past few years, users accustomed to opening accounts, receiving tasks, and interacting on Solana have mostly considered "on-chain storage is expensive, and accounts need to be budgeted carefully" as common sense. On August 28, 2026, a tweet from the core development team Anza shattered this old consensus: the technical solution SIMD-0437, aimed at significantly reducing on-chain storage costs, has officially activated its first functional switch on the Solana test net. This is not a simple parameter adjustment, but a phased cost-cutting experiment, with the goal of reducing the key parameter lamports_per_byte, which represents the storage cost per byte, from 6,960 to 696 after completing all 5 phases, theoretically reshaping the entire cost structure of account rent, token account deposits, and even long-term application maintenance.

For users tracking Solana ecosystem opportunities through the airdrop radar, this technical route resembles a "cost bomb" that has been ignited but has yet to land on the mainnet. SIMD-0437 is currently only effective on the test net, while mainnet parameters remain unchanged, meaning the paths for airdrop participation and task thresholds will not be rewritten immediately in the short term. However, once there is a follow-up on the mainnet, the repricing of account rent and rent-free deposits will directly impact how project teams design interaction frequency and allocate the number of accounts, which will, in turn, affect the real costs for ordinary participants to remain active across multiple accounts and chains. Meanwhile, the community has begun discussing the risks of on-chain state expansion that might be caused by a significant decrease in storage costs. These debates are still in early stages but provide a clear observation coordinate for airdrop participants and project teams: before SIMD-0437 progresses to subsequent phases or even the mainnet, the interplay between account costs and on-chain state expansion on Solana will be a key variable that cannot be ignored when assessing long-term participation strategies.

Test net Open: SIMD-0437 Disrupting the Old Rental Order

While debates were still limited to forums and tweets, Anza had already opened the first gate on the test net. On August 28, 2026, the first functional switch of SIMD-0437, which the community had been watching for a long time, was officially activated on the Solana test net. This signifies that the discussions surrounding "Is an account this expensive?" have begun to enter a quantifiable and reversible experimental stage. For users on the airdrop radar, this marks the dividing line from theoretical discussions about on-chain economic models moving to real testing: rent is no longer just a background constant, but a variable that will be continuously rewritten over the next few months.

This proposal is designed to be implemented in 5 functional switches rather than a one-time price cut, fundamentally preserving a buffer zone for "disrupting the old order". The target path is aggressive—reducing lamports_per_byte from 6,960 to 696, about a 90% decrease in storage costs—but the implementation method is deliberately restrained: each stage is launched individually and observed separately, allowing for on-chain account quantities, state sizes, and performance feedback to run a stress test on the test net before deciding whether to follow up on the mainnet. This incremental approach has previously appeared in several major protocol changes on Solana, but this time it is directed at the most sensitive issue of the ecosystem: "cost".

All changes at the current stage are strictly confined to the test net, with mainnet parameters remaining unchanged, and there is no official timeline commitment for when the next steps will advance. This arrangement means that airdrop participants and project teams can consider SIMD-0437 as a potential pivot for future task design and participation costs, but there is no urgent need to immediately rewrite behavior patterns on the mainnet. What truly deserves continuous tracking on the airdrop radar is whether the data combination of account costs, state growth, and performance on the test net can convince the ecosystem to accept a systemic farewell to the "expensive storage era" on the mainnet.

Account Costs Loosened, Multi-Address Strategy Welcomes Buffer

After SIMD-0437 was pushed onto the test net, the most directly impacted aspect was the old account-opening cost. The proposal targets two core expenditures: account rent and rent-free token account deposits, laying out the target path of reducing lamports_per_byte from 6,960 to 696, essentially conducting a theoretical re-evaluation of account costs across the entire chain by about 90%. Even though it is currently only effective on the test net, with mainnet parameters unchanged, traditional assumptions in the Solana ecosystem regarding "accounts being an expensive resource" are already beginning to show signs of loosening.

This loosening is particularly evident for user groups accustomed to multi-address and multi-token account participation. In the past, opening multiple accounts on Solana to diversify risks and split strategies essentially involved paying higher on-chain storage costs for greater strategic flexibility; when the single account deposit and rent-free token account threshold are systematically lowered, the marginal burden of opening an additional address or retaining several interaction branches decreases. The multi-address strategy no longer needs to frequently brake before the "cost threshold". From the airdrop radar perspective, this potential re-evaluation suggests that subsequent Solana tasks have more room to normalize frequent on-chain interactions rather than being forced to limit operations to only a few high-weight actions due to account costs. What truly needs to be continuously tracked is how data from the test net accumulates to inform decision-making for changes on the mainnet.

State Expansion Concerns Heat Up, Performance Pressure Becomes the Counter Bet

As marginal costs for accounts and storage are lowered, a straightforward result is that the impulse to "open more, keep more, and record more" is fully unleashed. Voices within the community have already emerged warning: if account costs are systematically reduced to lower levels, task design, application architecture, and even research habits will naturally tend to retain more information on-chain. From multi-address identities to fine-grained interaction logs, all of this may evolve into significant on-chain state expansion during future mainnet phases. These judgments are currently still primarily based on model inferences and discussions from a single source; in the moment where SIMD-0437 is only effective on the test net, users on the airdrop radar see a "variable that might amplify" rather than a set fact.

The issue lies in that Solana has consistently regarded high throughput and high performance as core narratives; the prerequisite for high-speed execution is that validation nodes can support the continuously growing state volume. State expansion means that each node needs to maintain a larger set of accounts and data, raising storage, bandwidth, and operational maintenance pressures, leading to heightened concerns within the community about increasing hardware thresholds. If this structural connection is empirically validated in the following phases, it will transform attempts at "cost reduction and use increase" into a counter bet regarding the performance curve: the heavier and more expensive the nodes, the more the network's decentralized resilience is tested, and the high-performance selling point itself may be re-examined. The design of the current test net phase aims to collect real feedback on the interactions between cost changes and state growth impacting performance without touching mainnet parameters.

For airdrop participants and project teams relying on high performance and fair execution environments to handle tasks, this is not an abstract technical debate but a direct constraint that affects their experience. If on-chain state rapidly expands during future mainnet phases, interaction failure rates during congested periods, task batch execution time delays, and result consistency at snapshot points will all be amplified. Project teams will have to consider "whether the network can remain stable" as a prerequisite when designing task rhythms and interaction densities. When tracking the subsequent phases of SIMD-0437, airdrop radar needs to continuously observe the core variable of whether test net data shows a clear link between state volume and node pressure, and whether this linkage is strong enough to influence whether, when, and how strongly cost-reduction paths will continue on the mainnet.

Gradual Advancement in Five Phases, Solana Provides Insurance for Aggressive Cost Reduction

From the design perspective, SIMD-0437 is not about slashing storage prices "to the bottom" all at once but is broken down into 5 sequentially advancing functional switches, each assessable independently to decide whether to continue. This phased approach to raising or maintaining parameters essentially adds a layer of "insurance" between Solana's aggressive cost reduction and network security: the goal is to cut lamports_per_byte from 6,960 to 696, achieving about a 90% reduction, but by implementing functional switches in segments, it avoids directly encountering all the uncertain consequences of parameter changes on the mainnet. For project teams and participants focused on the airdrop radar, this means that the re-evaluation of storage costs will not happen overnight but will gradually approach the target value through multiple decision points.

The first functional switch activated is only on the test net, while mainnet parameters remain unchanged, continuing Solana's usual route of "test net first, then mainnet" for significant protocol adjustments. The proactive approach taken by the test net brings not only an observation window but also potential rollback space: if after the initial phase’s cost cut, on-chain state volume, account growth, or node load displays signals beyond expectations, subsequent phases can slow down, be adjusted, or even paused, rather than being locked into a certain price point due to mainnet changes that have already been on-chain. From the perspective of the airdrop radar, this essentially observes whether Anza and the core developers truly regard "reversibility" as a design constraint—each phase’s functional switch is like an opportunity to recalibrate participation costs and network security weights instead of just a formal process.

Thus, phased advancement is not just a division of technical pathways but has reserved institutional space for strategic adjustments. Solana has previously verified the benefits of this incremental route with other protocol upgrades, but the specific coupling relationships between SIMD-0437 and other proposals remain in single-source speculation; the airdrop radar will not treat these unverified links as established premises. For participants, what truly needs to be closely monitored is how feedback collected on-chain during each stage on the test net will rewrite the cost curves and task design boundaries on the mainnet.

Airdrop Participation Threshold Re-evaluation, How to Incorporate Solana Clues into Self-Selected Lists

SIMD-0437 is pushing Solana from the old impression of "accounts and storage being expensive" towards a new narrative of "expected significant cost reduction". The target is to reduce lamports_per_byte from 6,960 to 696, which theoretically could lead to a nearly 90% reduction in storage costs at the account level, and past costs that were seen as hidden thresholds for account rent and rent-free deposits will need to be rewritten. However, at this current point in time, this is still just the first phase's switch activation on the test net; the mainnet parameters remain completely untouched, and any optimistic or pessimistic judgments regarding long-term cost curves still remain at the level of "expectation" rather than "results".

For airdrop players and project teams, once lower account costs are realized on the mainnet, the most direct changes will manifest in task design and multi-address strategies: whether the same user is more willing to split identities, whether projects are more daring to require the creation of more accounts, and how long-term participation budgets are reallocated will all be reassessed around the new cost thresholds. But these will only be potentially written into actual rules on the mainnet after the test net gathers data on on-chain state growth, changes in account numbers, and performance feedback. For users tracking the Solana ecosystem through the airdrop radar, SIMD-0437 will be regarded as an important contextual parameter for assessing project participation costs and execution environments. The Solana clues entering the self-selected list will stack this "potential cost reduction" dimension during evaluations, but will not be simply equated with definitive revenue signals; rather, they will serve as critical variables for observing the rhythm of mainnet activation and redefining task boundaries.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。