At the end of July, with only the final stretch remaining before the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision, the time window originally seen as the "night before orderly rate cuts" suddenly sprouted rare divergences and uncertainties: James Lagan of D.A. Davidson publicly stated that "the July rate hike window has opened," believing that if postponed until September, the Fed might face greater political criticism; Paul Zangari of Fidelity Investments anticipated that the FOMC would not only refrain from softening but would also maintain or even strengthen its hawkish tone in communication. In contrast to these hawkish judgments, the futures market pricing cited by the "Federal Reserve's mouthpiece" Nick Timiraos only indicated about one-third probability for a July rate hike—signifying that even if no hike occurs, this meeting will be all but certain to be a "guidance reset" concerning future paths. Meanwhile, the military conflict between the US and Iran escalated in July, believed to have interrupted the previously fragile balance of "moderate inflation and moderate employment," with the inflation progress accumulated just in June potentially being reversed at any moment, forcing the market to recalibrate interest rates and inflation centers. Nominal and real interest rate expectations were raised in hawkish narratives, with a potential strengthening of the dollar, leading to a systematic reassessment of traditional high-volatility assets, while Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and higher beta on-chain assets, which have always served as a "liquidity barometer," also stood at the forefront of this macro revaluation: how would the risk appetite, capital flows, and trading structures in the crypto market be forced to adjust and compromise when July's interest rate and inflation expectations are re-anchored?

Hawkish Sentiment Rises: Rate Hike Window Reopened

At a time when inflation progress is being questioned, James Lagan of D.A. Davidson straightforwardly pointed out that the "window" for a July rate hike has opened. If actions are delayed until September, the Fed will not only face more uncertain inflation and employment data but might also incur significant political criticism. The meaning of this statement is not merely "it can hike once" but shifts the market's previously assumed "patient wait-and-see" scenario to "action may occur at any time," raising the risk of an upward tail at the rate path. Paul Zangari of Fidelity added a perspective from communication, predicting that even if the FOMC chooses to remain motionless, it will most likely maintain or even strengthen its hawkish tone, reaffirming the priority of "anti-inflation" in its wording. In response, Nick Timiraos reminded investors that regardless of whether a rate hike occurs or not, the July meeting itself would become a new policy anchor—a resolution that "reasserts the bottom line" rather than a routine procedure.

However, the futures market only assigned about one-third probability to a July rate hike, revealing a rare divergence regarding the rate path: some funds continue to bet on "high rates having peaked and subsequently declining steadily," while others are beginning to pay for scenarios of "higher terminal rates maintained longer." Historical experience indicates that once forward guidance shifts toward a more hawkish tone, even if current rates remain unchanged, nominal and real yields often get pushed up, supporting the dollar, with macro-financial conditions tightening under "invisible rate hikes." For long-duration, high-volatility assets like stocks and crypto, this equates to an overall increase in discount rates: the risk-free interest rate curve in valuation models rises, risk premium demands increase, and existing prices need to be revalued downwards to create headroom. When the market begins to reshape narratives around "higher real rates" and "a stronger dollar," even if there is no rate hike in July, as long as the meeting statement and press conference convey sufficiently hawkish messages, capital will tend to reduce leverage and shrink high-beta exposures, putting BTC, ETH, and related on-chain assets back into a "liquidity-constrained" pricing framework, which is a macro constraint that crypto assets cannot escape in this round of interest rate pricing.

US-Iran Tensions Escalate: Energy and Inflation Expectations Rekindled

Just as the market had begun to adjust to the optimistic narrative of "moderate inflation and moderate job growth," the escalation of military conflict between the US and Iran in July struck like a cold bullet, interrupting the reassurance from June's data. Research briefs have clearly indicated that this round of conflict is seen as potentially reversing the inflation progress just reached in June—not because of the current level of oil prices, but because geopolitical tensions will quickly raise the risk premium on energy: traders have started to allocate insurance for "supply disruptions" and "rising transportation costs," with every uptick in the futures curve being an additional bet on future inflation expectations. This change in expectations constitutes a structural disruption to the market narrative that had initially hoped for "continued decline in inflation, July remaining motionless, and communication turning dovish for the year."

As energy and inflation expectations are rekindled, the Federal Reserve's operational space is forced to shrink. Higher, stickier inflation expectations mean that even if there is no rate hike in July, the decision-makers will find it difficult to clearly turn toward easing in their wording, having to use "higher rates for longer" to hedge against the secondary upward price risks brought on by oil price shocks. This locks crypto assets back into the contradictory framework of "high inflation + high rates": on one hand, descriptively, BTC and ETH will be brought back into discussions as "long-term inflation hedges" and "beneficiaries of fiat currency dilution," making it easier for long-term funds to compare them with gold and physical assets in allocation discussions; but on the other hand, high rates elevate the discount rate for all risk assets, compressing the valuation space for future cash flows and long-term stories, while rising real rates and a stronger dollar will further squeeze the pricing of high-volatility assets from both liquidity and opportunity cost sides. The result is this: against the backdrop of US-Iran conflict driving energy premiums higher, BTC and ETH will likely first endure pressure from rates and the dollar in the short term, undergoing revaluation through heightened volatility and leverage liquidation, and only after the market confirms that "inflation driven by oil prices is under control and the Fed is not forced into further tightening" can they reassert the premium on the "inflation hedge" side back into their prices.

AI Hardware De-leveraging: Tech Stock Pullback Drags High Beta Assets

Apart from the repricing of interest rates and the dollar, another shock hitting the crypto market comes from the steep pullback in AI hardware. Serenity's judgment is that the significant downturn in the AI hardware sector this round is more akin to a trading overshoot triggered by short-term de-leveraging rather than a sudden collapse in fundamentals: the latest earnings reports from AI-related companies like Bloom Energy and Teradyne still show significant revenue and profit growth, and the earnings forecasts from Chinese optical module manufacturers are quite strong, all pointing to the same matter—the demand curves for computing power, energy consumption, and optical interconnect are not turning back, and the long-term profit expectations for AI infrastructure remain solid.

The issue, however, is that asset prices first react to leverage and liquidity before they modify views on long-term profitability. Tech stocks, particularly AI hardware and high-growth technology, are categorized together with crypto assets as high beta assets; when interest rate expectations turn hawkish and funds begin to raise margins and compress duration risks, risk control models and risk parity portfolios tend not to differentiate "which has better fundamentals" but rather uniformly cut positions across the entire basket of high-volatility assets: AI hardware and tech stocks are first subjected to concentrated liquidation, causing volatility amplification in indexes, and subsequently, through margin consumption and tightening risk limits, propagating to BTC and ETH holdings, which also belong to high beta. As a result, even if the long-term narratives of the AI supply chain remain intact, short-term de-leveraging will initially force the crypto market to accept a round of passive liquidation and leverage cleansing in resonance with tech stocks, before there is room to rebuild positions and pricing frameworks under new rate and profit assumptions.

BTC and ETH Position Under Strong Dollar Expectations

When the futures market assigns only about one-third probability to a July rate hike, yet institutions like Lagan and Zangari still bet on "hawkish tones being maintained or even strengthened," what is actually being conveyed is another pricing notion: even without an immediate rate hike, strong dollars and high risk-free rates will be extended for longer. For cash-flow-less BTC and ETH, this means an increase in discount rates and a contraction in liquidity premiums, with the valuation anchor gradually shifting from "easing expectations" to "high rate norm." Coupled with the US-Iran conflict's disturbance to inflation, any narrative of "oil prices rising again and inflation recurring" will be pre-calculated by the market as a more stubborn high rate path, which first suppresses the valuation elasticity of all high beta assets, with BTC and ETH also unable to remain unscathed.

However, on the same chain, high rates and hawkish expectations will also restructure internal hierarchies: funds often first withdraw from long-tail altcoins and high-leverage DeFi, narrowing down to BTC and ETH, which have the best liquidity, size, and most stable narratives, while also moving some capital back to risk-free returns off-chain. The result is that superficially, BTC and ETH also appear to be under pricing pressure and experiencing volatility amplification; in reality, they are gaining a "relative hedging" role within crypto assets: the leverage multiple on perpetual contracts is passively reduced, option implied volatility rises, and protective put option positions are thickening, while the net flow of dollar-denominated anchored assets is returning from on-chain speculative pools to off-chain and top exchanges, presenting a structure that seems to preemptively reduce risks and leverage for a "strong dollar + high rates" scenario.

Crypto Trading Framework Under the Period of Uncertainty in Rate Decisions

Returning to the eve of this July interest rate decision, the overall situation can be summarized into three disturbances: first, a rare divergence in the interest rate path, with futures pricing a hike at only about one-third probability, while institutional voices including James Lagan and Paul Zangari emphasize that "the July window has opened and the tone is hawkish," and Nick Timiraos reminds that regardless of a rate hike, the resolution itself will release key signals; second, the US-Iran conflict raised the imaginative space for inflation and energy costs, interrupting the previous narrative of "moderate inflation," forcing the market to reprice for a longer duration of high rates; third, AI hardware is undergoing passive de-leveraging against the backdrop of still strong performance, significantly pulling back, leaving high beta asset valuation elasticity fully exposed. The structural implication for the crypto market is that during this phase of heightened uncertainty regarding policy signals, the pricing of BTC and ETH is almost always driven by three lines—interest rate expectations (federal funds futures and real rates), energy and inflation expectations (oil prices and related assets), and the risk sentiment of tech stocks, particularly AI hardware; the so-called "divergence" is fundamentally about a misalignment among these three lines. The mid-level repeatable framework is: first, using futures and interest rate swaps to observe market risk balances for rate hikes/pauses, combining policy signals similar to Timiraos to judge how much nominal and real rates will rise and for how long they will remain; second, observing whether high-growth tech and AI hardware experience "catch-up" or "lead the decline" under rate and geopolitical shocks, which will help calibrate the overall de-leveraging pace of high beta assets; third, comparing the term basis, perpetual funding rates, and implied volatility structures of BTC and ETH to monitor whether funds are flowing back from altcoins and high-leverage DeFi to mainstream assets or off-chain cash-like tools, aligning on-chain flows with off-chain hedging rhythms. In the future, in each "hawkish suspense period," the ability to interpret the repricing sequence and degree of leverage release for risk assets early in the misalignment and realignment of these three lines will determine the actual risk-return ratio for crypto traders amidst intense volatility.

Join our community to discuss and strengthen together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。