In the summer of 2026, Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore issued a warning not as a regular industry report but as a signal regarding global risk assets: the supply of memory for data centers remains tight with no signs of relief, and the expectation of at least a 25% quarter-on-quarter increase in DRAM prices in the third quarter means a reevaluation of costs across the entire AI infrastructure chain. At the same time, the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve dropped to 311.4 million barrels, marking a new low since 1983. The U.S. Central Command forced at least seven merchant ships to change course and restricted passage through Iranian ports in the Middle East, raising energy security and shipping risks. The market instinctively connected this to rising oil prices and inflation expectations, leading to a reinforcement of interest rates and the attractiveness of dollar assets. At the other end of the risk preference spectrum, the 60-day correlation coefficient between South Korea's KOSPI and the Nasdaq 100 index surged to 0.46, about three times the five-year average, with fund managers viewing South Korea as a barometer of global AI sentiment, a trend closely intertwined with the long-regarded “thermometer for tech stocks,” BTC and ETH. In this window of rising memory costs, depleting oil reserves, heightened Middle Eastern tensions, and global AI trading interactions, approximately $215 million in liquidations occurred within 24 hours in the crypto market, involving 78,151 traders, as concentrated leverage clearances pulled sentiment back from high expectations to the reality of retracements and liquidity, with BTC, ETH, and numerous high-beta tokens gradually shifting from an offensive position characterized by high leverage and dense narratives towards a defensive trading phase centered on position control and macro hedging.
Memory Shortage Elevates Costs: The Underlying Connection Between AI and On-Chain Computing Power
As crypto leverage passively cooled, Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore pressed the brakes on costs for global AI infrastructure: the continued tight supply of memory for data centers with no signs of relief, and the expected quarter-on-quarter increase of at least 25% in DRAM prices for Q3 2026, was viewed by the market as an overall upward movement of the computing cost curve. For AI training and inference, which heavily rely on high-bandwidth memory, this is not merely a simple contraction of gross margins, but a rewriting of cash flow models behind every GPU rack. Major suppliers of memory chips, such as Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology experienced stock pullbacks in anticipation of price hikes, as funds expressed skepticism regarding the semiconductor “expansion-overcapacity-downturn” old cycle and the current crowding in AI trades through a contrasting price action.
The repricing of this cost curve quickly extended to the on-chain realm. The various tokens emerging over the past year marketed themselves as financial shells participating in the prosperity of remote cloud computing, but now face valuation discounts resulting from elevated underlying hardware costs: as every unit of computing power becomes more expensive, the narrative of “infinite scalability” becomes less credible, prompting funds to differentiate between those who can genuinely penetrate cash flows and those simply leveraging AI hype. Should high costs force AI capital expenditures to slow down, related tech stocks in the Nasdaq and on-chain computing sectors may likely shift from expansion to contraction, pressuring cross-asset AI Beta to downgrade, as traders transition from chasing “computing price appreciation premiums” to defensively compressing positions and duration, with their preference for BTC and ETH’s relatively high liquidity more inclined towards risk aversion than offense.
Chip Stocks Retrench: AI Trading Shifts from Speculative to Defensive
With tight memory supply and Morgan Stanley forecasting a quarter-on-quarter increase of at least 25% in DRAM prices for Q3 2026, textbook logic suggests that storage leaders like Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology should enjoy a “price hike expectation premium.” However, the reality is that, under a consensus expectation of “memory prices are going up,” the stock prices of these companies have pulled back, even as the market generally views Samsung Electronics as undervalued, with its stock price still under pressure. This is not just a single company story, but rather a reflection of funds beginning to reassess the repeatedly enacted “expansion-overcapacity-downturn” cycle of storage chips: as everyone projects linear installations of AI servers over the next few years, savvy funds are questioning whether they are standing at a cyclical high, and in the most crowded lane.
Thus, traditional funds shifted from “buying all AI-related assets” to a defensive stance and profit-taking on cyclical semiconductor sectors, first reducing risk in the most crowded positions. As a global semiconductor hub, South Korea's KOSPI and the Nasdaq 100 index’s 60-day correlation coefficient has risen to 0.46, about three times the five-year average. The South Korean stock market is viewed by fund managers as a barometer for global AI investment sentiment; when this gauge starts shifting from euphoria to caution, BTC and ETH, highly correlated with the Nasdaq, are also regarded as high-beta technology risk exposures, thus becoming extended chips needing to cool down simultaneously. The capital exiting semiconductor and AI concept stocks does not just pertain to a single sector, but an entire offensive chain of “technology + crypto,” with high-leverage on-chain bulls being the first to face liquidation in this process. Should chip stocks continue to pull back, BTC and ETH, as high-leverage tail ends of technology risk trades, will also endure prolonged pressure from the defensive stances of traditional tech funds.
Oil Reserves Bottom Out Amid Middle Eastern Tensions: Crude Pricing and Inflation Expectations
As the risk exposures in the tech chain were forced to shrink, the energy buffer simultaneously became fragile. The U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve oil inventory has dropped to 311.4 million barrels, the lowest since 1983, indicating that once oil prices are disrupted by geopolitical events, the U.S. will find it difficult to smooth price curves through large-scale sales from reserves. The global market must directly face more “primitive” supply and demand fluctuations. Against this backdrop, the U.S. Central Command recently forced at least seven merchant vessels to change course in the Middle East, restricting passage through Iranian ports, and at least one merchant ship became incapacitated, causing a revaluation of shipping security in this critical oil-producing and transportation region. With oil reserves at a low and shipping routes disturbed, both crude futures and spot prices faced added risk premiums, thereby elevating expectations for rising oil prices, which marks the starting point for renewed inflation expectations.
From a macro transmission chain perspective, rising oil prices and inflation expectations typically boost both nominal and real interest rates, with the market actively pushing back the paths of monetary policy easing, leading to renewed allocation advantages for safe assets such as the dollar and U.S. treasury bonds. Historically, during phases of high oil prices and rising interest rates, risk assets like Bitcoin often undergo valuation compressions and amplified volatility: increased discount rates directly weaken the present value of forward narratives, as funds revert from high-beta assets to defensive positions, where high-leverage on-chain bulls are the first to passively reduce risk. Currently, as the protection cushion of U.S. oil reserves thins and supply risks in the Middle East increase, it implies that the pricing of assets like BTC and ETH must endure not only the cooling of tech trades but also every escalation in crude prices, inflation, and real interest rates while simultaneously testing their flexibility as global risk assets.
AI Sentiment Amplified by South Korean Stock Market: Nasdaq Signals Transfer to Crypto Sphere
Beyond discount rates and oil prices, there is a more concealed pathway for global risk preference: AI sentiment. The 60-day correlation coefficient between South Korea's KOSPI and the Nasdaq 100 has now risen to 0.46, three times the average of the past five years, with many fund managers openly using the South Korean stock market as a barometer for observing global AI investment sentiment—when U.S. AI giants lead the charge, whether South Korea, the frontline of semiconductors and memory chips, will keep pace and how closely it will follow is becoming a macro variable for measuring the crowding and sustainability of this latest AI trade.
During the same period, the tech narrative continually intensified within U.S. stocks and enterprise software: Nansen founder Alex Svanevik spotlighted Apple again, noting improvements in Siri and search experiences in iOS 27 Beta, with the integration of edge AI and hardware perceived as Apple’s next phase of growth engine; SpaceXAI embedded Grok into Microsoft Excel, pushing a model originally centered on “infrastructure” into the most routine office scenarios. These signals collectively form a thematic diffusion path originating from U.S. tech stocks and South Korean semiconductor stocks: first, the risk appetite for growth stocks and emerging markets ignited, followed by high-beta assets accelerating, including crypto tokens themed around AI, computing power, and tech narratives, as well as BTC and ETH which are often concurrently regarded as offensive positions during times of heightened technology risk sentiment. For crypto traders, the correlation between KOSPI and Nasdaq is no longer just a stock-story but a key observation point for determining whether AI sentiment is still spreading and beginning to transmit capital from stocks to the blockchain.
Two-Hour Liquidation Cycle: $215 Million Liquidated Signals Leverage Fragility
During the tightening phase of continuous memory supply issues, elevated DRAM price expectations, depleting U.S. oil reserves, and constrained Middle Eastern shipping conditions, the crypto futures market provided feedback via a set of real data: around $215 million was liquidated in forced liquidation within 24 hours, involving 78,151 traders, with leveraged positions across multiple varieties and platforms being cleared together. On average, nearly every two hours saw a round of concentrated forced liquidation, indicating that leverage levels on-chain and off-chain had entered an extremely sensitive range regarding volatility; once external variables shifted towards defense, funds collectively reduced positions, quickly transitioning crypto assets from “high-beta offensive positions” to risk exposures requiring downgrading.
This clearing rhythm is not an isolated incident but a typical script replay during times of macroeconomic headwinds, intensified geopolitical conflicts, and a turn in tech stock sentiment from exuberance to caution: the high-leverage structure initially fractures at the contract level, with the first to be liquidated being the highest leverage and most illiquid altcoin segments, subsequently affecting BTC and ETH contracts, which then reversely depress spot prices. The speed of acceleration in liquidations is often measured in hours, with prices experiencing sharp drops in a waterfall fashion, order layers being instantly emptied, and declines in small coins being multiplied; BTC and ETH also amplified panic pricing due to rising memory costs, energy security concerns, and the crowding in AI trades during this chain reaction, resulting in the conclusion that during macro volatility periods, high leverage no longer serves as a leverage that amplifies positive news but rather as a systemic vulnerability the crypto market must prioritize reducing.
From Memory and Crude Oil to Leverage: The Next Step for the Crypto Market
By mid-July 2026, Morgan Stanley forecasted a quarter-on-quarter increase of at least 25% in DRAM, U.S. strategic oil reserves plummeted to 311.4 million barrels amid constrained Middle Eastern shipping, the KOSPI’s coupling with the Nasdaq 100 was viewed by fund managers as a barometer of AI sentiment, and $215 million was liquidated within 24 hours with over 78,000 traders exiting. These seemingly unrelated clues have collectively tightened the valuation space of global risk assets and locked the risk appetite of the crypto market into a pressure matrix of high-cost energy, high-cost computing power, and high volatility in sentiment. Under this combination, the rational approach for funds is not to further double down on high leverage and high-beta themes but temporarily to shift back to BTC, ETH, and other highly liquid assets with established correlations to tech stocks, or to high-quality liquidity pools with clearer risk structures on-chain, thereby exchanging reduced leverage multiples on perpetual contracts and compressing on-chain leverage ratios for survival amidst macro noise. The variables to closely monitor have already been laid on the table: will the actual DRAM price increase follow Morgan Stanley’s scripted evolution, can the replenishment rhythm of U.S. strategic reserves rebuild oil price buffers, is the Middle Eastern situation calming or escalating, will the correlation between the South Korean stock market and the Nasdaq continue to rise and amplify the crowding of AI trades, and whether on-chain leverage ratios, the total supply of dollar-denominated coins, and the leverage levels of perpetual contracts on major exchanges will rise again; these will determine whether the crypto market is forced into long-term defense or has the conditions to reopen the windows for leverage and high beta trades.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/en-US/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
