In the same week of July 2026, the Brazilian Securities Commission and the State Duma of Russia almost simultaneously reached for the same gray area but chose two distinctly different paths: In Brazil, the regulator announced the establishment of the Securities Tokenization Working Group (GTT), providing a 120-day trial window, extendable by another 30 days, to allow distributed ledger technology to undergo "live" testing in traditional processes of securities registration, custody, trading, and settlement, transforming researchers who previously participated in international discussions into engineers actively involved in building sandboxes; whereas in Russia, the head of the State Duma's Financial Market Committee, Anatoly Aksakov, proposed legislation for the cryptocurrency market that entered the preparatory stages for its second and third readings, attempting to create a complete legal framework for the legitimate use of cryptocurrencies, excluding fraud and illegal use, while further refining which legally recognized high-liquidity instruments qualified investors and tested ordinary investors can access within the framework already introduced by the central bank under an "experimental legal system." One focuses on technological experimentation and scenarios of securities tokenization, while the other directly promotes the legal status of cryptocurrencies and rules for investor access. Both emphasize combating illegal activities and protecting investors but demonstrate two distinctly different regulatory temperaments in their path choices; looking at the time slice of mid-July 2026, the practical experiments in Brazil and legislative advancements in Russia are unfolding in parallel, no longer the simplistic "ban everything" defensive reaction of earlier days, but more like emerging regulatory authorities beginning to accept the existence of crypto-related activities and attempting to incorporate them into a manageable, constrained institutional order.

Brazil's CVM Bets on Tokenization: 120-Day Experiment Opens

Amidst a gradual recognition by global regulators that crypto-related activities "must be managed," Brazil chose to compress the battleground into its most familiar territory—the securities market. Recently, the Brazilian Securities Commission officially established the Securities Tokenization Working Group (GTT), giving clear timelines and tasks: an initial operating period of 120 days, with up to 30 days extension reserved for completing research, practical testing, and drafting supporting rules. This is not an open discussion, but rather more like a technical military exercise with a clear finish line. The CVM has been active in international discussions on regulatory tokenization; now moving the discussion into a "closed" domestic market means that regulators are no longer satisfied with listening to reports or writing position papers but are starting to personally verify whether the technology can integrate into the existing securities regulatory framework.

The scope of research and testing for the GTT has been deliberately delineated within the application of distributed ledger technology in traditional securities infrastructure: from registration and custody to trading and settlement, covering the most core and sensitive aspects of capital markets. In other words, the CVM is betting on embedding on-chain accounting within the existing securities system rather than providing new tracks for broader crypto speculation, which both reduces political resistance and ties tokenization directly to the "increasing efficiency and reducing risk" old problem. By mid-July 2026, the opening of this 120-day experiment marks not only Brazil's transition from "researching tokenization" to "piloting tokenization" but also sends a signal: in emerging economies, tokenization is no longer just a buzzword in meetings but is being regarded as a concrete option for rewriting the technical foundation of the capital market.

Russia's Bill Accelerates Passage: Crypto Trading Gains Entrance

Almost simultaneously with Brazil's announcement of the tokenization experiment, Moscow chose a different lead: rather than first transforming securities technology, it directly brought crypto trading itself onto the legislative track. This bill targeting the cryptocurrency market, proposed by Anatoly Aksakov, has already been scheduled for the second and third readings in the State Duma, accelerating the legislative process. However, before July 20, the outside world remains uncertain about the final voting results and exact passage timing. It aims to solve an unresolved dilemma for Russian regulators—recognizing that crypto assets "objectively exist" domestically and providing a usable framework accepted by courts and regulators while clearly excluding fraud, money laundering, and other illegal uses from the legal space, allowing future judiciary and law enforcement to have guidelines to follow.

Under an "experimental legal system" previously introduced by the central bank, qualified investors can access specific crypto products, while ordinary investors must first pass tests before participating in limited trading. This logic has now been further incorporated into the bill's text. The new legislation continues the "testing + tiered access" approach: after passing regulatory-set tests, ordinary investors are allowed to purchase instruments recognized by law as high liquidity, with regulators hoping to limit public participation to relatively manageable subjects while delineating a thin line between opening compliant investment paths and controlling risks. The central bank's experimental system provides a template, and the Duma's bill attempts to migrate that template from "experiment" into formal law, pushing crypto trading from the gray area towards a predictable compliant channel. The real test will be whether this selection and opening mechanism can prove its effectiveness in the market's operational reality over the coming months rather than remaining merely on paper.

Different Paths Taken in the Same Week: The Collision of Technical Sandboxes and Hard Legislation

In the same week, two hands in emerging economies almost simultaneously made moves, yet chose entirely different tools. The Brazilian Securities Commission pushed tokenization into the "experiment" phase by establishing the Securities Tokenization Working Group with a 120-day operating period, extendable by another 30 days, integrating distributed ledger technology into existing infrastructures for securities registration, custody, trading, and settlement, genuinely concerned with how traditional securities can continue operating on DLT tracks rather than opening crypto trading to the entire market. It resembles a regulatory sandbox: limited scenarios, limited participants, observing data and adjusting processes within a closed technical experimental field before deciding which rules can emerge from the laboratory and become future industry norms.

Russia, on the other hand, chose a different path. The State Duma accelerated a bill directly touching on "the legal use of cryptocurrencies" during the same time window, focusing on filling the existing legal gaps in the crypto domain, from the outset incorporating anti-fraud and illegitimate use into the text while defining the boundaries of ordinary and qualified investors and the scopes of investable tools as core clauses. The earlier "experimental legal system" proposed by the central bank provided a template for this design: ordinary investors who pass the test can purchase instruments recognized by law as high liquidity, whereas qualified investors gain broader participation space. This means that Brazil's tokenization experiment is more inclined towards the transformation of institutions and financial infrastructure, primarily impacting “behind-the-scenes players” such as custodians, exchanges, and clearing agencies; while Russia's hard legislation directly alters the access logic for end investors, determining who can access which crypto assets under what conditions. By July 20, 2026, both countries’ paths remain in the early stages, but their shared objectives of regulating the market, protecting investors, and combating illegal use have begun to reshape the gaming boundaries of crypto industry participants through the distinctly different methods of "technical sandboxes" and "hard legislation."

From One-Size-Fits-All to Tailored Regulation: Global Crypto Order Realignment

Looking at the two paths of Brazil and Russia from a distance, they converge on a turning point in global regulatory narratives: shifting from the early "should it be allowed" to the current "under what framework can we safely allow it." The Brazilian Securities Commission, through the Securities Tokenization Working Group, embeds distributed ledger technology within the existing securities market framework, conducting technological experiments in registration, custody, trading, and settlement—the most traditional aspects—rather than building a parallel market from scratch; Russia, meanwhile, has transferred the previously central bank-led "experimental legal system" into the formal legislative process of the State Duma, attempting to upgrade experimental scenarios into a nationwide compliant foundation with its cryptocurrency market bill. The commonality of these two choices is a shift away from questioning whether to close this door, to starting to articulate detailed rules regarding the door's size, the height of its threshold, and the order within it.

In this round of migration, emerging economies have ironically become forerunners on the paths of tokenization and crypto legislation. Brazil established trial boundaries with a working group cycle of 120 days plus 30-day extension, while Russia refined the access logic of "which high liquidity instruments ordinary investors who pass the test can purchase" in the second and third reading bill processes. These designs could potentially redraw the destination and compliance map of global capital—funds may flow more willingly towards jurisdictions with clear rules, stable law enforcement, and smooth coupling of technology with traditional markets. However, as of July 20, 2026, both Brazil's tokenization experiment and Russia's cryptocurrency legislative push remain in the early stages of framework construction. What will ultimately determine whether they are perceived as "regulatory friendly" or even "capital magnets" is not the names of the working group and bill announced today but how the specific provisions will be implemented and how to delineate a credible thin line between combating fraud and leaving room for innovation in the coming years.

Regulatory Game Just Beginning: What Red Lines Should Investors Watch

Reflecting back at the moment of July 20, 2026, Brazil and Russia appear to be making two different openings on the same global chessboard: Brazil focuses on technical experiments in securities tokenization, using GTT’s 120-day window that can be extended by 30 days to deconstruct the application of DLT in registration, custody, trading, and settlement into verifiable scenarios. What will truly guide the market in the future is how these testing results will be incorporated into specific securities tokenization rules regarding which assets are allowed on-chain, how to determine "securities attributes," and who will be responsible when issues arise in on-chain registration and settlement; Russia, meanwhile, opts to cut in from the legal status and investor access angle, aiming to define legal use boundaries for crypto assets within the yet-to-be-completed second and third readings of its bill, designing "high liquidity instruments" for ordinary investors to purchase only after testing while also using anti-fraud and illegal use to tighten the gating at the other end. For investors, the most practical action currently is not to bet on which country is "friendlier" but to closely observe two subsequent crucial nodes: whether the outcomes from Brazil's GTT stage are eventually solidified by the CVM into formal rules that narrow the regulatory gap between tokenized securities and traditional products, and whether the manner in which the Russian bill's execution details delineate qualified and "tested" ordinary investors is truly operational in the final voting after the bill is published. As the latest official texts from regulators in both countries have yet to be made public, the actual red lines and gray areas remain shrouded in the advancement of procedures and the refining of terms. It is foreseeable that more emerging economies will seek their rhythm between Brazil's type of technical trials and Russia's legislative standards, with regulators no longer satisfied with simple prohibitions but rather reshaping the global crypto regulatory landscape through rounds of pilot programs and legislative amendments. For ordinary participants, the true red line to keenly focus on is the boundary drawn at the intersection of experimentation and legislation by various countries, which will determine whether the global crypto market in the coming years will be compressed into a gray area or reshaped into a predictable compliant space.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。