AI changes productivity, blockchain changes production relations: the two are not on the same track.

CN
2 hours ago

- The changes brought by blockchain to the world are 100 times greater than those by AI. Despite the development of AI, blockchain has prepared everything. Everything will be decentralized; does the way of heaven have a center?

Which of these two technologies brings greater change to the world is too easy to spark debate.

However, from the perspective of which technology is easier for the general public to perceive, at least for now and for some time into the future, AI will bring changes to the world and society that are more obvious and can be more easily perceived by the public compared to blockchain.

The statement I more agree with is that among various technological inventions and creations in human history, those that directly change visible production efficiency in a physical way are far more numerous, while inventions and creations that change production relationships or change the production efficiency of virtual assets are relatively much fewer.

So, if we say that blockchain is an invention that changes production relationships or changes the production efficiency of virtual assets, then such inventions are quite rare in human history.

This may also relate to the developmental stage of human society.

If there had been no Internet bringing humanity into the virtual world, we would not have seen the birth of blockchain technology.

"Everything will be decentralized" is a bit exaggerated. Each of these two technologies has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the differences are quite obvious. I would still judge which technology is better and which is more suitable based on specific usage scenarios.

- A hook ecological launch platform token sa1t has recently emerged; can you discuss the mechanism and model of this project?

From its current mechanism, this platform focuses on the launch mechanism, but in terms of application, it seems that there is nothing particularly surprising.

As for how this platform token is, I will still use the method from the May 18 article "In the Uniswap V4 Hook Wave, Who Will Be the Next True 'King of Cash Flow'" to judge if it has potential value:

"Therefore, moving forward, although I will still pay attention to various innovations, I will focus more on business innovations and application innovations that can serve existing crypto assets, as well as asset innovations supported by actual application scenarios."

First, does this platform serve the existing stock of crypto assets and explore possible but undiscovered demands for these existing assets?

Clearly, this platform does not.

Secondly, does it serve application innovations and asset innovations based on supported application scenarios?

At least for now, I cannot see it.

It still only allows users to continuously issue assets, but it can issue assets using an innovative mechanism that may stabilize token prices or better meet users’ special expectations.

But do these assets have application scenarios or solve existing application problems?

I cannot see that either.

If both of the above judgment criteria are not met, then the coins it currently issues are just another pile of meme coins, just a game of speculation.

I am not participating in such games right now.

So regarding this type of innovation, at least at this stage, I will only pay attention to its development but do not feel that it has much value worth focusing on.

- When will you go live?

Our latest X account has also encountered problems recently, so the live broadcasts originally on X have become inconvenient,

so there are no short-term plans for a live broadcast.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink