On June 22, 2026, according to a single source, the highest-level financial and foreign exchange regulatory authorities in South Korea collectively hit the brakes. The Financial Services Commission, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, and the Bank of Korea, after completing internal reviews of the industry's recent requests for relaxation of virtual asset regulation, clearly stated it is difficult to "immediately advance" related adjustments, and frankly concluded: the current policy tone has not shifted towards relaxing virtual asset regulation. This cold water statement is a reversal of the loosening expectations that rapidly spread following the roundtable held on June 8 by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups and industry representatives on the theme of "regulatory rationalization" — during that meeting, sensitive topics such as access to overseas transfer business, the registration threshold for startups, restrictions on cross-border remittances and investments, and the legislation of the "Basic Digital Asset Act" were discussed, which many practitioners interpreted as a sign that regulation was starting to "ease." However, the three regulatory agencies provided a starkly different narrative: under the current legal framework, many of the proposed adjustments from the industry are difficult to implement, and what is currently being done is merely collecting opinions and reviewing rule rationalization, rather than giving the green light to relax regulations. The industry's expectations of "regulatory rationalization" and the cautious, even conservative attitude of the top regulatory agencies on this day formed a clear confrontation line, and under this situation, the possibility of South Korea genuinely moving towards relaxing virtual asset regulation in the short term is rapidly shrinking.
From the Warm Signals of the Roundtable to the Cold Water Dousing in Two Weeks
If the collective statement from the regulatory authorities on June 22 is seen as a "brake," then the moment on June 8 seems more like a gentle press of the accelerator. According to a single source, on that day the Ministry of SMEs and Startups held a roundtable for the first time on the theme of "regulatory rationalization," specifically inviting representatives from the virtual asset industry to discuss very "practical" topics: from access to overseas transfer business, to the registration threshold for startups, to restrictions on cross-border remittances and investments, and the "Basic Digital Asset Act" which was included in the discussion but always lacked public text and a legislative timeline; almost every item pointed to the most constrained key points felt by the industry.
From the industry's perspective, this roundtable led by the ministry responsible for SMEs and innovation entrepreneurship was quickly interpreted as a rare "warm wind signal": if there was an opportunity to relax access to overseas transfer business, if the restrictions on cross-border remittances and investments showed signs of loosening, combined with a reassessment of the qualification thresholds for startups, and if the "Basic Digital Asset Act" provided clearer boundaries at the legislative level, then a pathway for gradual relaxation of regulation seemed to be opening. Because of this, in the following two weeks, many industry participants regarded the roundtable as a "warm-up" before formally communicating with the top regulatory agencies, holding hopes for substantial loosening in the short term. However, the statements from the Financial Services Commission, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, and the Bank of Korea after internal reviews were clearly defined as a formal response to the roundtable and its derivative loosening imaginations, restating that they were "still in the stage of collecting opinions and reviewing rule rationalization," effectively announcing to the market: short-term loosening is not among the current options of the regulatory top level.
Three Major Regulators Refuse in Unison: The Relaxation Button Is Temporarily Locked
Following the June 8 roundtable, the three highest-level financial and foreign exchange regulatory agencies in South Korea initiated an internal review process, scrutinizing the regulatory adjustment list proposed by the industry item by item. According to a single source, after the review concluded, the consensus was highly consistent: at this stage, either explicitly opposing or deeming it difficult to "immediately advance" most of the loosening requests, this collective statement was immediately defined as a formal response to the roundtable and its subsequent imaginings. In other words, the market's initial expectation that the "window had opened" was rewritten in the official wording of regulation to "still in the stage of collecting opinions and reviewing rule rationalization."
The core signal conveyed by the three agencies is equally clear: the current policy tone has not shifted towards relaxing virtual asset regulation, and in the short term, they do not consider writing the industry’s viewed critical relaxation measures into actual rule updates. The regulatory authorities not only hit the brakes in attitude but also pointed out a more "technical" obstacle — that without amending the current law, some or even most of the proposed adjustment recommendations from the industry lack operational space. By using this legal framework reasoning, the top institutions have locked problems that seem resolvable through departmental regulations or administrative interpretations back to the legislative level, essentially telling the market: even if public opinion and industry sentiment have run ahead, the actual timetable for pressing the relaxation button still depends on a legislative and law amendment process that has yet to take shape.
The Legal Ceiling Pressing Down: No Major Relaxation Without Changing the Law
When the Financial Services Commission, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, and the Bank of Korea made their statements to the public, nearly every key phrase revolved around the same shackles — "without amending the current law." This is not a matter of shirking responsibility but a positioning that determines the wording: standing as the highest-level financial and foreign exchange regulatory agencies in South Korea, they know best that even slightly relaxing access to overseas transfer businesses or loosening restrictions on cross-border remittances and investments will immediately tread on the red lines of existing foreign exchange management and financial regulation. The June 8 roundtable, held under the guise of "regulatory rationalization," laid bare the pain points that the industry genuinely cares about, while the response from the regulatory authorities on June 22 cited "impossible to execute under the current law" as a footnote, clearly telling the industry: the areas you wish to "patch" through departmental regulations have essentially touched upon the legal text itself.
The "Basic Digital Asset Act" was listed as a topic in the roundtable agenda, appearing to reserve an opportunity to redefine boundaries in the future, but as of now, there is no public text content nor is there a definitive legislative timeline. In this state of vacuum, the regulators emphasize that they are "still in the stage of collecting opinions and reviewing rule rationalization," while locking all substantive loosening in a timeline of "post-amendment," effectively setting a clear upper limit: before the new basic law is enacted, any loosening ideas related to overseas transfers, cross-border remittances, and investments can only remain at the discussion level; "regulatory rationalization" can optimize details but is unlikely to change the overall situation of virtual asset operations still being constrained by existing financial and foreign exchange laws.
South Korea Chooses to Tighten First, Then Stabilize: Regulatory Red Lines Do Not Shift Easily
If we look at this round of disagreements over a longer cycle, the "regulatory rationalization" topic raised by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups serves as a pressure test: while the industrial sector attempts to promote loosening access to overseas transfer businesses, cross-border remittances, and investment restrictions under the guise of innovation and competition, the subsequent collective rejection from the Financial Services Commission, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, and the Bank of Korea publicly reveals their cards — the current policy tone has not turned towards relaxation, and so-called rationalization can only occur within the existing financial and foreign exchange law frameworks. The regulatory side admits that it is still in the "stage of collecting opinions and reviewing rule rationalization," and ties the premise for most adjustments to "post-amendment," essentially telling the market: discussions can focus on whether the rules are smoother, but capital flow and financial stability, these bottom-line red lines, cannot be touched.
This rhythm outlines a typical "tighten first, stabilize later" approach: first firmly incorporating virtual asset operations into traditional financial regulatory logic using the existing legal system, and then using a still-discussed "Basic Digital Asset Act" to outline future spaces, rather than releasing easing signals in the legislative vacuum period. From a risk appetite perspective, the clear cooling off of the demands for "regulatory rationalization" conveys an attitude that it is better to sacrifice some short-term industrial imagination in order to avoid expanding regulatory gray areas before the law has been upgraded. In the global regulatory competition surrounding virtual assets, South Korea chooses to prioritize stabilizing financial safety and capital order before discussing how to reshape industrial competitiveness through special legislation, which means that for the foreseeable future, South Korea's narrative on virtual assets will continue to be dominated by the logic of financial security, instead of being rewritten by the logic of industrial competition.
The Game Has Just Begun: How Will Industry Demands Restructure?
After the highest financial and foreign exchange regulatory agencies hit the brakes collectively, South Korean virtual asset companies have been forced to press the pause button on their short-term imaginations for loosening access to overseas transfer businesses and restrictions on cross-border remittances and investments: the path that once hoped that "one roundtable + one internal review" could open the door has been blocked, and more teams can only shrink cross-border layout plans within the existing framework, delay registration and the landing time of new businesses, and redirect energy towards compliance cost control and single-market stock competition. The real game ahead will likely shift from "immediate relaxation" to a route dispute surrounding the "Basic Digital Asset Act": the industry must restructure its demands within the "regulatory rationalization" discussion arena built by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups, packaging significant adjustments that are difficult to advance without amending the law into priority items for future legislation, translating current demands into legal technical issues that can be accepted by the Financial Services Commission, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, and the Bank of Korea, rather than simple calls for relaxation. Meanwhile, under the premise that the regulatory tone clearly states "has not turned towards relaxation," the more realistic industry strategy can only steadily nibble space on the fine details that can be interpreted as "rule rationalization review," by continuously providing data, cases, and risk assessments, in a long cycle linked to the legislative rhythm of the "Basic Digital Asset Act," striving to subtly raise the industry's tolerance within the narrative of financial security to favor its own direction.
Join our community to discuss together and become stronger!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
