On June 12, 2026, under the spotlight in Prague, Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), personally put a brake on the "never sell coins" mantra. At the BTC Prague event, he stated clearly that he had never said the company could not sell Bitcoin; the repeatedly emphasized advice of "never sell your Bitcoin" was just a suggestion for retail individual investors, not a tenet written into the company's bylaws. For this company, widely regarded as one of the largest publicly listed holders of Bitcoin globally, the batch of Bitcoin on its balance sheet has long been more than just a line item; it symbolizes the long-term bullish belief of the entire market, with each acquisition and every "diamond hands" remark treated as a footnote for the cyclical direction. This time, several Chinese crypto media outlets amplified his clarification simultaneously, separating the "retail advice" from "company strategy," and naturally throwing out an even sharper question: how would the possibility of the company selling Bitcoin, as Strategy clearly stated in fulfilling its fiduciary duties or meeting operational and cash flow needs, reshape or even rewrite the bullish narrative that has built up around it over the past few years.

Slogans Grounded: Saylor Marks the Line

In recent years, as Strategy continuously added Bitcoin to its balance sheet, Saylor repeatedly emphasized "buy and hold" in public forums, tightly binding his personal image with the slogan of "never sell coins." The market extended this line within the long-term bull narrative, interpreting the "diamond hands" spirit originally directed at retail investors as a commitment that Strategy, as a publicly listed company, would also "never sell Bitcoin," even viewing its holdings as a kind of unwavering bullish trump card.

At the BTC Prague event, Saylor directly separated these two narratives. He clearly stated, "I have never said the company cannot sell Bitcoin," immediately adding an explanation—“never sell your Bitcoin,” targeted at individual investors in the audience and those watching on screen, rather than institutions like Strategy. The company would sell Bitcoin in necessary circumstances to fulfill its fiduciary responsibilities or meet operational cash flow needs, which he deliberately distinct from emotional slogans. Numerous Chinese crypto media outlets reported this clarification in the same time frame, fully conveying this original statement to the Chinese community, amplifying the sense of boundaries between "retail advice" and "company strategy," and prompting the market to reassess who or what is constrained by this repeatedly cited slogan and to what extent.

A Watershed Between Company Position and Retail Belief

When Saylor stated that "the company would sell Bitcoin in necessary circumstances," the boundary drawn was actually between fiduciary responsibility and personal belief. As a publicly listed company, Strategy's Bitcoin positions written on the balance sheet serve, like cash and debt instruments, primarily as resources to serve operational and shareholder interests, rather than as badges to demonstrate management's bullish loyalty. In extreme cases, to pay off debts, ensure operational cash flow, or respond to unforeseen expenditures, the board and management have the obligation to consider any assets as disposal options, and Bitcoin is no exception; this obligation does not become void simply because the CEO is an extreme bull.

In contrast, Saylor's statement "never sell your Bitcoin" is directed at individual retail investors who do not bear fiduciary responsibilities for others' funds. They can bind their positions entirely to personal cycles, risk preferences, or even emotional commitments, without needing to bear legal consequences for the safety of others' assets or the continuous operation of the company. Over the past few years, the market has habitually overlaid these two identities, assuming that Strategy itself would also unconditionally "hold on." Saylor's deconstruction of this binding in a public setting may lead some shareholders to feel that the "faith premium" has been weakened, realizing that company strategy must ultimately obey cash flow and risk control constraints; others, who value governance and survivability more, may view this as a necessary rational reminder: Strategy has never been a purely faith-based entity but must operate on top of Bitcoin while being accountable for its choices.

Every Move of On-Chain Bitcoin Giants is Magnified

Because Strategy is considered one of the publicly listed companies with the largest Bitcoin holdings globally, its overall on-chain position has long been regarded by the market as a "lighthouse" signal. Over the past few years, investors have become accustomed to stitching together the company's disclosed holding reports and sporadic identifiable on-chain clues to infer its accumulation pace, viewing this trajectory as a symbol of long-term bullishness - as long as this "whale position" seems stable, many believe the long-term bullish sentiment for Bitcoin remains intact.

This time, Saylor's clear statement that "the company will sell in necessary circumstances" equals opening a window to future expectations of potential on-chain sell-offs or rebalancing: if one day someone captures suspected outflows from addresses related to Strategy on-chain, the interpretative framework will no longer be a singular emotion of "faith collapse," but will return to rational discussions regarding fiduciary duties and cash flow management at the company level. However, the brief has clearly pointed out that there is currently no new data regarding recent on-chain address changes or specific transaction records for Strategy, only amplifying this verbal clarification itself; all imaginations about "what the next whale might do" are currently still residing in the narrative realm, rather than established on-chain facts.

The Collision of Short Bets and Bullish Narratives

While the market is repeatedly digesting Saylor's clarification of "can sell," another narrative comes from a radical short account. According to a single source, this trader rolled approximately $106,000 into about $550,000 in just two days, with a win rate of approximately 83%, then pushed the chip to a higher table - establishing and holding a short position of about 344.6 BTC, with a nominal value of about $21.81 million, and a liquidation price marked near the line of $64,080.

In this structure, the range of profit and risk is stretched to the extreme: if prices continue to go down, his book profit based on the prior $550,000 will increase; but once the market trends back near $64,080, this bet valued at 344.6 BTC will face liquidation, and the previously rolled-out profits may also be quickly devoured. It should be emphasized that the brief did not specify when this short was established relative to Saylor's remarks nor provided any motivation or strategic explanation; this account can only be considered a sample of the existence of aggressive bearish bets in the current market and should not be interpreted as a direct response to Saylor's words.

Returning from Idol Rhetoric to the Routine of a Bitcoin Company

When Saylor supplemented his statement on stage in Prague with "the company can sell when necessary," the "never sell Bitcoin" slogan repeatedly cited by bulls over the years was pulled back into the reality of boardroom discussions, fiduciary responsibilities, and cash flow tables. The myth has not been completely overturned but has been refootnoted: individuals can declare never to sell their coins, but Bitcoin companies must provide answers in front of creditors, shareholders, and auditors. Looking ahead to Strategy, one must take Saylor's personal remarks as both emotional and narrative coordinates, while also returning to company-level disclosures and verifiable on-chain behaviors - without concrete information, any claims regarding whether they sold or repurchased in May 2026 can only remain in the "to be verified" column. Meanwhile, according to a single source citing a report from Coinbase's Quantum Advisory Committee, about 7 million Bitcoins are considered more vulnerable to quantum attacks due to public key exposure and address reuse, and quantum computers capable of breaking encryption may emerge as early as 2030. This long-term technological risk is not directly related to this clarification but serves as a reminder to all major holding institutions: faith can be held high, yet governance and risk control must continually update, allowing for long-term buffers against technological and institutional uncertainties beyond the balance sheet.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Exclusive AiCoin Hyperliquid Benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive AiCoin Aster Benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/en-US/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram Community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain Community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin On-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。