On May 19–20, 2026, Hyperliquid updated the official HIP-3 documentation, rewriting the originally fixed requirement of staking 500,000 HYPE into a dynamic requirement that will gradually decrease as the ecosystem matures. According to the current rules, any third party wishing to deploy a perpetual DEX through HIP-3 must first stake 500,000 HYPE to launch a trading market with independent margin and order books, defined parameters—this high threshold was initially used to filter participants with financial strength and commitment levels, yet it has objectively increased entry costs, creating tension with Hyperliquid's goal of expanding the ecosystem through HIP-3. The latest document attempts to hedge this tension: the staking requirement for deploying perpetual DEXs will gradually decrease as the infrastructure and overall ecosystem mature, and when the threshold is lowered, the portion of HYPE currently staked that exceeds the new threshold can be unstaked, only needing to retain the quantity that meets the latest threshold. Although no timetable or triggering conditions have been provided, this "adjustable and exit-able" design has effectively changed the rules of the game—who can deploy perpetual DEXs on Hyperliquid will no longer be defined by an unchanging threshold of 500,000 but will instead be re-layered by an admission mechanism that changes with the ecological phase.

The 500,000 HYPE Threshold: A Safety Moat or a High Wall

Returning to the initial design, HIP-3 provided Hyperliquid with a clear path for ecological expansion: the official documentation states plainly, "Any deployer who meets the staking requirements can deploy a perpetual/permanent DEX." By staking 500,000 HYPE, a third party can open a perpetual DEX with independent margin and an independent order book on the same underlying infrastructure, setting parameters independently, akin to building a parallel trading venue next to the main stage. For the protocol itself, this outsources liquidity and user demand to a broader "operator," allowing them to create various perpetual markets around Hyperliquid.

The initial threshold of 500,000 HYPE in this model serves both as an admission ticket and as a constraint. The official background given is that in the early stages of the ecosystem, this amount is meant to ensure that deployers possess at least a certain level of financial strength and commitment, filtering out short-term players who merely dip their toes in and switch off at will, ensuring that every newly opened perpetual DEX is backed by a "stakeholder." However, over time, a fixed, unchanging high threshold began to contract the range of roles that could participate—after all, the number of participants who can lock up 500,000 HYPE long-term is limited, leaving more potential strategy teams and vertical project parties stuck outside. Thus, the same rule began to create tension at different stages: is it still preserving Hyperliquid's safety moat, or has it become a high wall obstructing the path of ecological expansion? This became a question the project party must address before actively lowering the threshold.

The Threshold is No Longer Fixed: Staking Requirements Begin to Become Variables

The update to the HIP-3 document on May 19–20 provided a third answer that lies between a "moat" and a "high wall": the 500,000 HYPE is no longer written as a long-term fixed rule but is explicitly defined as a starting threshold that will "gradually decrease with the maturation of infrastructure/ecosystems." For the first time, the official document acknowledges that this value is merely a temporary standard used to filter deployers with financial strength and long-term commitment during the early stages, and as the network itself becomes more mature, the same safety requirements can be achieved with lower staking demands.

The more crucial change is that after the threshold is lowered, the portion of HYPE that exceeds the new threshold can be unstaked, with deployers only needing to retain the quantity that meets the latest threshold. This means that for future participants, staking is no longer a one-time sunk cost of "deciding how many years to lock," but more like a margin pool that will be recalculated with the ecosystem's progress—the current 500,000 serves as a ticket, but once the threshold is officially lowered in the future, the excess can flow back into the deployers' hands, significantly improving overall capital efficiency. Correspondingly, another layer of uncertainty arises: as of May 20, the document did not provide any specific timetable for lowering the threshold, triggering conditions, or quantification formulas, with the threshold being loosely tied to the variable of "ecosystem maturity," making this rule resemble a dynamic throttle controlled by officials to adjust the expansion rate and participant structure of HIP-3 perpetual DEXs at different stages.

The Possibility of More DEXs Entering and Quality Risks

If this "throttle" truly begins to loosen, gradually lowering from the current 500,000 HYPE, combined with the rule that "the portion exceeding the new threshold can be unlocked," the participant profile in HIP-3 is likely to expand from a few financially strong teams to more small and medium teams, regional teams, and even single-asset or segmented trading strategy vertical perpetual DEX attempts. This expansion is currently only a path reserved in the document and not a given fact, but the threshold no longer being viewed as a long-term fixed value inherently opens up the imagination for "more types of DEXs to enter."

The problem is that the official clearly states "any deployer meeting the staking requirements can deploy a perpetual/permanent DEX," and does not introduce any additional technical review or manual screening clauses in this update, meaning that when the threshold is lowered, the quality differentiation of projects in the ecosystem is likely to be amplified, and the difficulty for users to distinguish quality will also increase. Each DEX launched through HIP-3 has an independent margin and order book, theoretically limiting issues like individual DEX risk control failures or liquidation chaos to local impact without directly affecting other DEXs; yet, on the flip side, if there are numerous independent order books of varying scales in the future, users' liquidity choices, market making strategies, and risk assessments will be forced to become more precise, and the tug-of-war between open admission and fragmented ecology is likely to be a core tension Hyperliquid will need to manage in the long term.

Hyperliquid's Expansion Rhythm: Delegating Power but Not Abandoning Control

From a protocol perspective, the design of HIP-3 inherently carries a "semi-open" character: Hyperliquid delegates the deployment rights of perpetual DEXs to any third party willing to stake HYPE while locking that openness within a controllable range through the threshold of 500,000 HYPE. The officials explain in the document that this value is prepared for the early stages of the ecosystem to filter out deployers lacking financial strength and long-term commitment; at the same time, each perpetual DEX deployed through HIP-3 has an independent margin and order book, and the parameters are set by the deployers themselves, making the protocol itself resemble a foundational infrastructure built, deciding "how many ramps to open today" through the staking threshold.

The latest document directly ties this threshold to "infrastructure/ecosystem maturity," sending another key signal: 500,000 is no longer viewed as a permanent constant, but as a scale that adjusts with the environment. When the threshold is lowered, the HYPE portion exceeding the new threshold can be unstaked, and deployers can reclaim a portion of their stakes without losing their existing DEX qualifications; however, when to lower, by how much, and the frequency of reductions have no timetable, triggering conditions, or quantification formulas provided in the document, meaning the adjustment power is almost entirely in the hands of the protocol party. In this arrangement, the threshold curve itself becomes the most intuitive policy signal: maintaining a high threshold for the long term indicates a proactive tightening of the ecosystem's rhythm; once it begins to lower, it equals a public declaration to all potential deployers and users that Hyperliquid believes the current infrastructure and ecosystem state can withstand greater scales of openness.

The Observation Focus After the Threshold: Rhythm, Quality, and Transparency

The transition of staking thresholds from fixed to adjustable fundamentally marks the starting point for Hyperliquid's search for a new balance between "amplifying the ecosystem" and "maintaining order": 500,000 HYPE is no longer written as a long-term constant, but bound with infrastructure and ecosystem maturity; in the future, when the threshold is lowered, the excess staked HYPE can also unlock an exit, adding certainty for early deployers. However, as of May 20, 2026, public information still leaves three key blanks: first, the timetable, triggering conditions, and quantification standards for threshold adjustments have not been disclosed, remaining at the directional statement of "will gradually decrease”; second, the document does not state whether new technical reviews, security, or risk control clauses will be introduced when the threshold decreases, to hedge against the potential quality differentiation brought by an influx of DEXs; third, outsiders currently cannot see the quantity and actual performance of perpetual DEXs already deployed through HIP-3, making it impossible to verify the effectiveness of this mechanism with on-chain operational results. The following three lines of inquiry are worthy of close tracking: firstly, any announcements or rule refinements from officials regarding threshold changes and how they explain the judgment criteria for "ecosystem maturity"; secondly, whether as time progresses, there emerge extreme parameters, subpar experiences, or cases of reverse innovation experimentation with the types and operational performance of perpetual DEXs launched through HIP-3; thirdly, the actual feedback from market makers, traders, and potential deployers within the ecosystem regarding this adjustment—whether they see the adjustable threshold as a genuine signal of openness or choose to wait and observe due to the uncertain rhythm and accompanying mechanisms.

Join our community, let's discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
AiCoin On-Chain: https://aicoin.com/hyperliquid
Exclusive AiCoin Hyperliquid Benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive AiCoin Aster Benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。