On May 8, 2026, Federal Reserve Governor Milan broke the "ironclad consensus" that had prevailed for the past two years: in her view, current policy has begun to significantly suppress the job market, and "cutting interest rates is appropriate." Almost at the same time, a report from RBC BlueBay presented a completely opposite scenario — the Federal Reserve would stand pat throughout 2026, and "real rate cuts would only be considered after inflation starts to decline in 2027." One voice is a dovish one from within the decision-making body, and the other is from an asset management firm betting on "higher for longer." This divergence was quickly reflected in the repricing of 5-year U.S. Treasury yields and real interest rates, reigniting the risk-off sentiment in global risk assets: given that rates had already been raised aggressively since 2022 and high rates would persist through 2024-2025, if rates were locked at high levels for even longer, how would the valuation discount rate for high-duration assets like tech stocks, BTC, and ETH adjust? Additionally, how would an elevated U.S. dollar risk-free rate squeeze the spread between U.S. Treasuries, money market tools, and on-chain U.S. dollar-denominated assets? This is also core to the inquiry of this article: what valuation anchor is being changed by high rate expectations, and how is that reshaping the capital flows and trading structures of BTC and ETH?

Dovish Milan's Intervention: Job Pressure Weighs on Wall Street

On May 8, 2026, Federal Reserve Governor Milan publicly addressed a matter the market had been reluctant to confront: after aggressive rate hikes in 2022 and maintaining high rates in 2024-2025, current policy "is suppressing the job market," and she believes "cutting rates is appropriate." In an environment where inflation is still above the 2% target and official rhetoric emphasizes "anti-inflation as a priority," such comments created a crack in the mainstream narrative of "higher for longer" — Milan no longer discussed abstract price targets but pinned the cost of monetary policy to "suppressed employment." This made her seem particularly dovish internally and forced the market to reassess the Fed's response function: once the weight of a weakening labor market was elevated, the future path of interest rates would no longer simply be a matter of "watching the inflation curve until the end."

For interest rate traders and crypto traders, the combination of a weakening labor market and Milan's minority viewpoint does not mean an immediate rate cut; rather, it increases uncertainty regarding the path ahead: on one hand, market participants hear institutions emphasizing that there will be no rate cuts in 2026 and that inflation must fall in 2027, while on the other, they see some within the Fed publicly calling for a halt on employment measures. As a result, 5-year U.S. Treasury yields and expectations for real interest rates are more easily swayed between "persistent inflation" and "declining growth." If the medium-term curve is frequently disturbed by these comments and data, the pricing anchor for high-duration assets will constantly be pulled. Valuation expectations for tech stocks and BTC, ETH fluctuate, while the expected spread between on-chain dollar-denominated yield strategies and U.S. Treasuries or money market funds also becomes unstable. In this environment of amplified internal divergence, macro events will be priced as "trading material," with volatility rising around FOMC meetings and official speeches, and BTC and ETH are more likely to experience amplified fluctuations triggered by a single statement or employment data. This uncertainty-driven premium will become the trading environment the crypto market must adapt to in the near term.

BlueBay Bets on Rate Cuts in 2027

At a time when internal conflicts within the Federal Reserve are intensifying, RBC BlueBay presents an extremely "cold-blooded" baseline path: no interest rate changes throughout 2026, and only when inflation begins to materially fall in 2027, will the door to rate cuts open. For a market that has already endured the rate hike cycle from 2022 into 2024-2025, this is akin to nailing a stake into the mid-term curve — do not expect the policy side to quickly pull nominal rates back into a "comfortable zone," as high interest rates themselves are seen as the new normal.

More subtly, Mark Dowding's detailed assessment states that he does not believe U.S. 5-year Treasury yields have the capacity to remain above 4% for the long term, but BlueBay has not bet on a rapidly declining interest rate curve; rather, they switch from medium-term TIPS breakeven inflation trades to directly going long on inflation-linked bonds. This configuration seems more like embracing a scenario where "real interest rates are kept at levels that suppress risk assets but do not excessively stifle growth" — 5-year nominal yields may struggle to persist above 4%, yet would not collapse due to significant rate cuts. For macro funds, this aligns closely with the market's mainstream "higher for longer" narrative: prolonged policy rates and persistently high real rates lock the relative attractiveness of interest rate assets within a compelling range. The result is mid-to-long-term discount rates being pinned down, so for long-duration assets like tech stocks and for volatile, high-elasticity risk assets like BTC, ETH, the speed at which their valuation ceilings are elevated significantly slows down, with any rebounds appearing more like rhythm trades under a high-rate ceiling rather than a genuine repricing of the discount rate.

High Rates Locking Duration: BTC/ETH Valuation Ceiling

When institutions like BlueBay start betting that "there will be no rate cuts before 2027" and predict "5-year U.S. Treasury yields are unlikely to sustain above 4%," what the market truly locks in is not a specific point but an entire segment of the discount rate curve. The high rates of 2024-2025 and elevated real rates have already pinned high-duration assets like tech stocks down, while BTC and ETH, classified from an institutional viewpoint as "high volatility, high duration, cash flow-less assets," essentially treat extremely long-term stories as the core support for current prices, making their valuations inherently more sensitive to discount rates and risk premiums: for each additional year the discount rate remains at a high level, the theoretical upper limit for long-term prices is lowered further.

If the market accepts the path of "no substantive rate cuts before 2027," it implies that for the next three to five years, the U.S. dollar risk-free rate around 4% and elevated real rates will become the return hurdles that all risk assets must overcome. BlueBay's shift from medium-term breakeven inflation trades to directly going long on inflation-linked bonds illustrates that within this rate range, securing real rate returns is more certain than chasing the uncertain premiums of high-duration assets. When funds compare U.S. Treasuries, money market tools, and on-chain dollar-denominated interest products, as long as the "risk-free 4%" exists, high-volatility, cash-less BTC and ETH must offer significantly higher expected returns to persuade funds not to buy that 5-year Treasury. For the crypto market, this high real rate locked duration environment essentially compresses the long-term imagination of BTC and ETH into a high-threshold bet that must overcome a 4% risk-free rate.

Dollar Spread Trading: Pressure on Stablecoins and DeFi

As "higher for longer" shifts from slogan to numbers on the curve, the U.S. dollar risk-free rate is no longer just background noise. BlueBay’s report betting on no rate cuts from the Fed in 2026, along with the assessment that 5-year U.S. Treasury yields are unlikely to break above 4% for the long term, essentially informs global dollar liquidity: parking money in U.S. Treasuries, money market tools, and inflation-linked bonds is sufficient to gain considerable real returns. For funds accustomed to using dollar-pegged tokens to participate in on-chain interest products, the standards have been completely rewritten — CeFi interest accounts, DeFi lending pools, and yield farms are all priced against risk-free dollar returns; as long as the on-chain annualized premium fails to sufficiently compensate for smart contract risks, liquidity discounts, and regulatory uncertainties, fund managers find it easier to defend that "no volatility, flying the U.S. flag" treasury note in committees rather than being accountable for a set of complicated on-chain strategies.

The direction of spread trading has also changed accordingly. In the last round of frenzy, the typical approach involved leveraging dollar-pegged tokens to chase perpetual contract positive funding rates, spot-futures arbitrage, and high APY farms, effectively moving off-chain dollars onto the chain to earn thicker spreads; however, in the context of high rates locking down the mid-term curve, the same pool of capital started reversing: unwinding perpetual contract leverage, exiting yield farms, and reinvesting settled dollars back into U.S. Treasuries and money market funds. The result is that long-term futures funding rates have been suppressed or even turned negative in stages, while the on-chain risk-free yield curve has been capped by the dollar risk-free rate, leading to a narrowing of the premium DeFi is willing to pay for dollar liquidity. Only when BTC and ETH fluctuations amplify enough and on-chain spreads clearly outperform the 5-year Treasury curve will cross-market capital have reasons to flow back from the Wall Street ledger into on-chain smart contracts.

Escalating Interest Rate Divergence: Which Curve Should Crypto Traders Focus On?

Milan's public call for "cutting rates now" targeted the job market being suppressed by policy; BlueBay, on the other hand, has cemented its baseline scenario as remaining inactive in 2026, awaiting inflation to decline in 2027, representing a countervailing "higher for longer" pricing force. These two narratives split the U.S. economy in 2026 into a contradictory sample: inflation remains relatively high, while employment is weakening; the current phase is not a waiting period for an "inevitable rate cut," but rather a period of divergence where the direction and rhythm of the interest rate path are both uncertain. For crypto traders, it is less meaningful to hyper-focus on the federal funds target rate dot plot at this time; more critical are the 5-year U.S. Treasury yields, the implied inflation expectations of medium-term inflation-linked bonds, and the real interest rate curve formed by both — these are the true metrics Wall Street uses to transport duration risk between tech stocks and BTC, ETH. Should employment data further deteriorate, or inflation decrease more rapidly than BlueBay anticipates, the mid-end curve may be forced downward and real rates may decline, potentially triggering a high-beta rebound in BTC and ETH, with the on-chain premium for dollar liquidity having an opportunity to expand once more. Conversely, as long as the "higher for longer" narrative continues to hold sway, with the 5-year yields and real rates anchored at high levels, the compression of the dollar risk-free rate on the on-chain yield structure is unlikely to ease, and the valuations and risk appetite for BTC and ETH will be pushed down near their floors. In this path conflict, what crypto traders really need to focus on is whether the 5-year Treasuries, real rates, and inflation expectations begin to bend downward together.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。