Author: Coach Liu
Weekend panic, Monday reversal. This script has been repeatedly played out too many times in 2026.
In the past 48 hours, history has repeated itself once again. The negotiations between the United States and Iran collapsed, and Trump ordered the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. With double negatives hitting the market, Bitcoin dropped 4% from Saturday night to Monday morning. WTI crude oil prices even broke through $105 on Sunday.
By traditional logic, this should have been a significant bearish signal for risk assets. The breakdown of negotiations means escalation of conflict, and the blockade of the strait indicates a supply shock. Oil prices should rise, and Bitcoin should fall.
So what happened?
During Monday's trading session in the U.S., Bitcoin rebounded strongly to around $74k, completely erasing the weekend's losses [1]. The Nasdaq rose more than 1%, also showing a contemptuous attitude toward geopolitical risks. The most ironic part was oil prices—despite the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, crude oil not only did not rise, but instead fell back below $100, closing at $98.
The breakdown of negotiations was supposed to be a negative factor, yet the market rose. The blockade of the strait was supposed to be a positive for oil prices, yet oil prices fell.
The trading chain believes this can perhaps be explained in just two words: desensitization.
What is desensitization?
It is when the same stimulus occurs repeatedly, and the market no longer produces a dramatic reaction.
The first time the U.S.-Iran conflict escalated, Bitcoin dropped 10%, and the market became chaotic. The second time, it dropped 5%, and some people began to buy the dip. The third time, it dropped 4%, and then quickly bounced back on Monday. By the time of this incident, the breakdown of negotiations and the blockade of the strait meant Bitcoin only needed 48 hours to complete its drop and reversal.
This is not because the negative factors have become smaller, but rather because the market's reaction threshold has increased.
Since 2026, whenever bad geopolitical news appears on weekends, Bitcoin will first drop, and then quickly rebound on Monday. This script has been played out so many times that short-term traders have learned to operate in reverse—selling on Friday, buying on Sunday, and selling on Monday.
When a volatility pattern is understood by the market, it stops creating panic and instead creates arbitrage opportunities.
Why has desensitization occurred?
First, geopolitical risks have become normalized. U.S.-Iran negotiations, the blockade of the strait, drone strikes—these terms have appeared so frequently in the news in 2026 that they have become numbing. The market realizes that these events will not end in the short term, nor will they escalate into a full-scale war. Thus, the events themselves lose their unexpected factors, leaving only trading-related fluctuations.
Second, institutional funds provide underlying support. Strategy purchases tens of thousands of BTC every week, and the issuance and trading scale of STRC preferred shares continue to expand. This means that every time retail investors panic sell over the weekend, institutions will pick up the chips on Monday. After a few occurrences, short-term traders have learned not to sell, but instead buy over the weekend and wait for institutions to lift the market.
Third, the narrative around Bitcoin is being reconstructed. When the market discovers that Bitcoin no longer plummets in the context of the U.S.-Iran conflict, and may even rise, it is gradually being reclassified from a risk asset to a sort of safe-haven asset. This process cannot happen overnight, but each rapid recovery after a negative shock reinforces this new narrative.
What are the boundaries of desensitization?
The trading chain needs to point out that desensitization does not equal immunity.
If one day, a full-scale war truly breaks out between the U.S. and Iran, or if the Strait of Hormuz is blocked by mines preventing tankers from passing, shocks of that magnitude will still cause assets to fluctuate dramatically, and Bitcoin will be no exception.
Desensitization only applies to normalized low-intensity conflicts. When conflicts escalate from weekly news headlines to real war, the market's reaction threshold will be instantly breached.
But conversely, if it truly comes to that point, Bitcoin's attributes as a non-sovereign hard asset for hedging would be ultimately validated.
Conclusion
The market is becoming desensitized to geopolitical risks. For long-term holders, this is a good thing—a decrease in volatility means an improved holding experience, and the risk of missing out on panic sales is also decreasing.
Negative factors come, there is a dip; negative factors go, and it rebounds. Then it continues along the path it should take, slowly moving upward.
If you believe in Bitcoin's long-term logic, then each market that comes after desensitization is a more mature market.
References
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
