Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

For me personally

CN
Phyrex
Follow
4 hours ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

For me personally, whether the stocks are real or not is not the most important thing; the most troublesome issue is that these issuers are independent, so each platform's mapped Token is different.

For example, the SpaceX sold on platform A might be SpaceX-A, and the one sold on platform B might be SpaceX-B. Although they are both called SpaceX, they are essentially not compatible, which can lead to significant differences in liquidity, depth, and actual transaction prices.

If the market reference price for SpaceX is $1,000.

Then on platform A, it might also display $1,000, but with poor depth, listing to sell at $1,000 might ultimately result in selling out at $800. When listing to buy at $1,000, the actual average transaction price might be driven up to $1,500.

On platform B, although the displayed price is also $1,000, due to better depth and stronger market making, the buy and sell prices might closely complete around $1,000.

So it seems quite unreliable, which is very normal. The issue is not just the price, but the differing capabilities of the market makers behind it. Large market makers will try to keep the price close to the reference price; smaller or less capable platforms will have a significantly larger spread between buy and sell prices.

What’s more troublesome is that because the issuers are different, the legal structures are different, and the clearing and redemption mechanisms are different, these Tokens are not compatible with each other, making it almost impossible to engage in risk-free arbitrage.

Furthermore, the biggest issue with SPV mapping is that there is usually no way to physically deliver. Even if one manages to catch a reference value SpaceX-A or SpaceX-B at $800, it does not mean one will definitely make money.

Whether one can make a profit does not depend on whether the platform will go bankrupt, but rather on whether the platform has sufficient depth and liquidity, whether there is a clear exit and redemption path, and whether there are still people willing to take over at a reasonable price.


免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

不止加密,一站式交易美股、外汇等全球资产
广告
|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by Phyrex

3 hours ago
The focus today is on the negotiations between Iran and the United States in Pakistan.
3 hours ago
It should be normal that the first time did not succeed.
4 hours ago
I have really encountered this matter before.
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatarPhyrex
3 hours ago
The focus today is on the negotiations between Iran and the United States in Pakistan.
avatar
avatarPhyrex
3 hours ago
It should be normal that the first time did not succeed.
avatar
avatarPhyrex
4 hours ago
I have really encountered this matter before.
avatar
avatarDelphi Digital
4 hours ago
Liquidity could become a headwind for BTC
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink