Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

There’s a New DeFi Bill in Congress—What Does That Mean for Crypto Market Structure?

CN
Decrypt
Follow
2 months ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced a bill Thursday that would exempt certain decentralized software developers from criminal liability.


With crypto’s stalled market structure bill poised to contain similar language, what does the bill’s introduction mean for the state of privacy-focused crypto legislation in Washington?


The new bill goes further than similar language currently being debated in market structure legislation—but should not be seen as an indication that the market structure bill’s language on developer protections is too weak, nor that the market structure bill itself is doomed, a source familiar with the thinking behind the new bill told Decrypt.


The new bill, dubbed the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act, would formally amend the language of a U.S. criminal statute that has been successfully used—by both the Joe Biden administration and the current Donald Trump administration—to prosecute crypto software developers.





The statue, U.S. code 1960, defines an illegal money transmitting business. Today’s legislation would amend the code to ensure it applies only to individuals who “exercise control over currency.” It was introduced in the House today by Reps. Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI), Ben Cline (R-VA), and Zoe Lofgren (D-CA).


Last year, an Ethereum software developer was found guilty by a Manhattan jury of violating code 1960 for developing a crypto privacy tool called Tornado Cash. The developer argued that because the software was decentralized, and he did not take custody of user funds, he should not be considered the operator of an illegal money transmitting business.


Some months later, the Trump Department of Justice secured guilty pleas under code 1960 from two Bitcoin software developers who created a similar platform called Samourai Wallet. The developers are both currently serving sentences in federal prison.


“This bill is critically important for engineers,” the DeFi Education Fund, an industry advocacy group, said today of the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act.


“It makes it clear that software developers who do not take custody of or control other people’s money can build neutral technology, here at home, without worrying about being criminally prosecuted as if they are a financial intermediary," the group said.


The crypto market structure bill is likely to include language addressing code 1960—but not language that actually rewrites the statute itself. The language would, instead, order that “non-controlling developer[s]” not be treated as engaged in money transmitting under code 1960. 



Language in the bill surrounding decentralized finance, or DeFi, is currently in relative flux, however, as lawmakers and industry stakeholders attempt to salvage the legislation after months of delays. DeFi refers to the collection of financial applications that exist natively on blockchain networks, circumventing the need for third-party intermediaries such as banks.


DeFi language in the bill, though, while not finalized, is unlikely to be the hill the bill dies on, sources familiar with the matter told Decrypt. Industry leaders and the banking lobby are currently locked in another disagreement regarding stablecoin rewards, while Senate Democrats and the White House remain at an impasse on language regarding conflicts of interest and President Trump’s numerous crypto ventures.


Lawmakers have urged that the bill needs to see significant progress in the coming weeks, or it risks falling by the wayside as Congress grinds to a halt in the spring ahead of November’s midterms.


免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by Decrypt

36 minutes ago
Reform UK\\\'s Nigel Farage Faces Standards Probe Over Tether Billionaire\\\'s $6.7 Million Gift
2 hours ago
Tezos Tests Post-Quantum Privacy as Founder Slams \\\'Half-Baked\\\' Bitcoin Quantum Theories
2 hours ago
Bitcoin’s Dip Below $80K Could Be ‘Short-Lived’ as STRC Cycle Looms
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
17 minutes ago
CME Launching Nasdaq Crypto Index Futures Led by BTC, ETH, XRP
avatar
avatarDecrypt
36 minutes ago
Reform UK\\\'s Nigel Farage Faces Standards Probe Over Tether Billionaire\\\'s $6.7 Million Gift
avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
1 hour ago
Coinbase Wins USDC Treasury Deployer Seat on Hyperliquid, Circle Handles Cross-Chain Infrastructure
avatar
avatarcoindesk
1 hour ago
LIVE: Senate Banking Committee holds key hearing to advance Clarity Act
avatar
avatarcoindesk
1 hour ago
Why bitcoin’s recent climb to $80,000 might just be a temporary liquidity squeeze
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink