In the Eastern Eight Time Zone this week, several funding clues surrounding the outflow from the U.S. Bitcoin spot ETF, China's large-scale claims registration, and new public chain ETFs attracting capital are being packaged together on the same narrative map. On the surface, these are independent events from different markets and different subjects, but in essence, they point to a core change: funds are urgently braking in the crypto track while seeking new exits. Meanwhile, data from institutions like Glassnode indicate that the number of active addresses on the Bitcoin chain has approached a near five-year low, showing a stark divergence from the inflows and outflows of funds in financial products like ETFs. This unusual structure of “on-chain cooling, off-chain bustling,” combined with regulatory and judicial events such as claims registration by Chinese investors, is amplifying a sense of fracture—why are funds both retreating and chasing new targets? And how will the shadow of regulation and judiciary reshape the risk preferences and game rules in this divide?
Sudden Funding Halt and Confidence Shock
● ETF Outflow Data: According to a single source, the U.S. Bitcoin spot ETF had a net outflow of about $205.82 million in a single day. In the context of "recent performance," this figure is not a historical extreme but appears particularly eye-catching during the stock battle phase. Funds are casting votes against it with real money, indicating that even without a drastic price drop, some institutions and compliant funds are choosing to exit temporarily, narrowing their risk exposure to a more controllable range.
● On-chain vs. Off-chain Contrast: Parallel to the outflow of ETF funds, multiple institutions including Glassnode, Santiment, and CryptoQuant point to a consensus—the number of active addresses on the Bitcoin chain has fallen to near five-year lows. This indicates that basic on-chain usage behaviors are continuing to cool, while financialized trading around BTC (including ETFs, derivatives, etc.) is still operating at high frequency, creating a structural misalignment of “on-chain silence vs. off-chain noise.”
● Intertwined Retreat Motivations: The nearly $200 million net outflow at the ETF level is hard to categorize simply as a single emotional drive, as it may contain elements of profit-taking after experiencing the previous market phase, alongside risk-averse reducing positions due to uncertainties in the macro environment and regulation. Without being able to reference specific price paths, it can be confirmed that some funds have chosen a “wait and see” approach, leaving a buffer space for future volatility and potential black swans.
● Confidence Chain Transmission: This single-day outflow does not inevitably signify a trend collapse, but it has created a visible impact on short-term market sentiment and the core narrative of Bitcoin. ETFs were once viewed as the flagship of “institutional entry and compliance,” and now that flagship is seeing fund withdrawal, which is likely to trigger a reevaluation of “whether institutions are really increasing their Bitcoin holdings,” making retail investors more inclined to reduce their positions rather than double down in the face of observed on-chain activity at a low point.
On-chain Cooling and Financialization Frenzy
● Consensus on Declining Activity: Continuous monitoring from Glassnode and other on-chain analytic institutions shows that the number of active addresses on the Bitcoin chain has steadily declined over time and is now nearing a five-year low. This is not a daily anomaly, but a slowly descending curve reflecting a waning willingness to conduct native on-chain transfers, payments, and application interactions, indicating a tide going out for the “everyday” use layer.
● Migration to Centralized Channels: The divergence between activity and transaction volume is importantly attributed to the fact that trading activities have increasingly migrated to exchanges and financial products. From high-frequency contracts and options to spot ETFs and various structured products, funds are more accustomed to completing rotations through matching and share redemptions, rather than frequently transporting assets among on-chain addresses, resulting in “an apparent on-chain quietness, but a lively off-chain trading” becoming the new norm.
● Shift in Story Focus: This misalignment is quietly rewriting the narrative weight of Bitcoin. On the one hand, early stories such as decentralized payments and peer-to-peer cash have been diluted because real on-chain usage data cannot support continuous expansion; on the other hand, the active trading of ETFs and derivatives reinforces the label of “Bitcoin = highly elastic financial asset,” making BTC resemble a global asset with options properties rather than a fundamental tool for everyday economic activities.
● Structure Leaning Towards Professional Funds: When the on-chain activity cools while financial products surrounding Bitcoin remain busy, it indicates that market structure is shifting towards being dominated by professional funds. High-frequency institutions, market makers, and large capital are deeply engaged in compliant and off-chain tools, while the marginalization of retail addresses diminishes the narrative of “grassroots spontaneous consensus.” This move towards a more finance-engineered ecosystem suggests that future market rhythms may rely more on macro and regulatory variables rather than purely on community sentiment igniting.
From Heavy Investment HYPE to Betting on SOL ETF
● Extreme Leverage Samples: On an individual level, the largest long position address in HYPE currently shows a floating loss of about $17.47 million, highlighting the recent risks of high-leverage speculation. A single address heavily betting on a single token creates volatility that magnifies into devastating drawdowns; once the narrative reverses or liquidity weakens, such positions typically find it difficult to exit in time, ultimately becoming publicly visible “negative case studies” on-chain.
● Capital Migrating to New Public Chains: In contrast, SOL spot ETF saw a net inflow of approximately $7.9852 million in a single day (according to a single source), indicating that some funds are trying to transition from mainstream assets like Bitcoin towards new public chains and new narrative carriers. SOL’s market visibility in the public chain track and ecological expansion has led to its ETF being seen as another channel for “compliant bets on high Beta assets,” attracting funds seeking to enhance returns.
● Contrasting Risk Exposure Methods: Heavy single token vs. diversified ETF corresponds to entirely different paths of risk visibility. The former often concentrates risk on the token itself and individual decisions, where drawdowns are directly reflected in the significant floating losses of single wallets; the latter, through basket configurations and regulatory frameworks, dilutes the drastic volatility of a single asset into the overall portfolio's net value fluctuations, with investors facing the “product level” drawdown curve rather than a detailed liquidation of individual positions.
● Illusion of New “Safe Harbors”: When Bitcoin is under pressure and ETFs see net outflows, some funds turn towards new ETFs and new themes, attempting to find the next “relative safe haven” in new public chains like SOL or other new narratives. However, this migration is essentially more about “risk reallocation” than real hedging—switching between high-volatility assets resembles a re-bet on odds and trends, simply wrapped in different story packaging and product carriers.
China's Claims Registration and Compliance Cost Repricing
● Large-scale Claims Timeline: In terms of regulation and judiciary, the Qian Zhimin case has become an important string affecting the emotions of Chinese investors. According to a single-source report, approximately 11,300 Chinese victims plan to submit claims, with the deadline for registration being May 22, 2026. This indicates that for the next two years, this case will exist in public opinion and the legal system in a “ongoing” form.
● Long-tail Impact on Risk Cognition: Such a large-scale claims action directly impacts the baseline of trust ordinary investors have in various “crypto-related financial products” and cross-border investment and financing tools. For those who have suffered actual losses or have similar cases around them, even with new concepts and products continuously emerging in the market, this historical scar will create a long-tail effect on a psychological level, raising their threshold for product transparency and legal protection.
● Compliance Costs and Product Restructuring: The deep involvement of regulation and judiciary will realistically raise the expected compliance costs for project parties and platforms. Issuers will have to invest more resources in disclosure, custody, and risk explanation to reduce potential future legal risks. This pressure, in turn, will force product design to evolve towards clearer structures and more traceable capital flows, further squeezing the space for blurred boundaries and gray areas.
● Retail Investor Willingness Hindered: In the current cautious funding environment, such typical cases reinforce the risk aversion sentiments of retail investors. Even when seeing impressive gains in new ETFs and new concepts, some small and medium investors may choose to remain on the sidelines, preferring to reduce leverage and avoid complex structures; those truly daring to buy at high levels and actively engage more often shift towards institutions with professional research and compliance resources, exacerbating the structural differentiation of “strong actors competing while weak ones exit.”
Off-chain Winds and AI Narrative Amplifier
● Hong Kong AI as an Emotional Sample: On a broader asset landscape, Hong Kong AI application stocks have seen a single-day gain of over 21% (according to a single source), becoming an amplifying sample of the current technology and AI narrative. Such high-volatility movements not only ignite the secondary market's imagination regarding the “AI productivity revolution” but also silently send a signal to the crypto world: new technological narratives still possess strong capital attraction capabilities.
● Exchanges Capturing AI Sentiment: In the crypto space, leading platforms like Binance Alpha are intensively launching related products around AI and tokenized assets, in rapid response to this cross-market sentiment. Although there is limited information on specific contract terms and yield structures, the rhythm itself indicates that exchanges have regarded “AI + tokenization” as a key entry point for a new round of product innovation and traffic competition, attempting to build a bridge of sentiment and capital between traditional tech stocks and crypto assets.
● Cross-market Capital Resonance: When the AI sector in traditional markets strengthens, and on-chain and within exchanges, tokens and structured products related to AI continually appear, cross-market capital resonance becomes possible. Some funds may participate in AI concepts through stock accounts, while others amplify the same narrative’s leverage in crypto through tokens or ETFs, reflecting the technological optimism across both markets and creating a stronger emotional tension than in a single market.
● Pursuing Strong Narratives and Structured Products: Under the fatigue of the crypto mainline and the shadow of regulation, funds are more willing to pursue new concepts with clear narratives and strong structural design. AI, tokenized assets, and new public chain ETFs provide story templates that can be packaged and told, and also can reallocate risks and returns through product structures (like shares, indices, and combinations). This makes “a clear story + understandable product” a magnet for capital, while traditional single-token speculation becomes relatively faded.
Next Steps in the Funding and Regulatory Game
The current scene is shaping up: on one side is the net outflow of $205.82 million from the U.S. Bitcoin spot ETF and the active addresses on-chain approaching five-year lows, revealing the pressure on the main line; on the other side is the capital inflow of new products like SOL spot ETFs and the large-scale claims registration from Chinese investors simultaneously advancing. As funds toggle between fear and greed, they no longer blindly act to “all in or all out,” but instead more delicately layer their allocation among Bitcoin, new public chains represented by SOL, AI concepts, and structured products while incorporating regulatory expectations and risks from historical cases into their decision-making framework.
For readers, this means that before chasing any new narrative, new ETFs, or new structured products, two fundamental questions must be answered: Who are your counterparties? Where is your legal and regulatory environment? Only with sufficiently clear understanding of capital structure, leverage levels, and judicial protection boundaries can one discuss undertaking risks that match their capabilities in a high-volatility market, rather than passively becoming the next “extreme sample address on-chain.”
Looking ahead to the next phase, the crypto market is very likely entering a period of low on-chain activity and high selective stock gaming. Trading will not disappear but will become much more concentrated on a few narratives and a few products; regulation will not exit; instead, it will continually refresh the psychological price levels of practitioners and investors through typical cases and claims progress. As funds undergo self-purification and structural rearrangement in a harsher gaming environment, the next truly large-scale trend may only re-emerge on a more solid compliance framework and a more mature risk preference.
Join our community, let's discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
