In the Eastern Eight Time Zone this week, the overall volatility in the cryptocurrency market has intensified, while the Ethereum network presents a starkly different picture: on-chain indicators remain robust, yet the price of ETH continues to weaken, with the two curves diverging further apart. Meanwhile, BitMine has made a counter-cyclical move, purchasing approximately 20,000 ETH for about $46.04 million, creating a strong contrast with the panic selling by retail investors. On another front, Robinhood has launched the gold token PAXG, with spot silver recording a monthly increase of about 11%-12%, and Cipher Mining plans to issue $2 billion in senior secured notes in the traditional market. The risk-hedging and arbitrage chain formed by gold, silver, and mining company bonds intertwines with the busy activity on the Ethereum chain and the price corrections, sketching a highly fragmented market structure.
On-chain Activity Remains Busy: Ethereum's Perspective
● Strong on-chain indicators: Ethereum core developers and research institutions have repeatedly mentioned that the TVL (Total Value Locked) measured in ETH has not experienced a systemic collapse. Messari analyst Sam Ruskin emphasized that the current TVL, when observed in ETH terms, remains relatively stable, indicating that despite the price decline, funds have not significantly withdrawn from the protocol itself but have chosen to continue using the Ethereum ecosystem as the main collateral and liquidity vehicle.
● Usage demand has not significantly cooled: From the perspective of on-chain transaction activity and infrastructure operation, the usage of the Ethereum network has not slowed down in tandem with the secondary market price. Daily transfers, DeFi operations, NFTs, and various application calls remain at high levels, with validator nodes and client operations running smoothly, showing no signs of the typical bear market rhythm of "congestion—collapse—silence." This sustained operation indicates that the rigid demand at the technical and application layers continues to support the network's value.
● Technical rhythm and price cycle misalignment: Ethereum Foundation core developer Marius Van Der Wijden reminds us that "the market often struggles to accurately reflect the on-chain technical fundamentals." The current scenario is a testament to this judgment: development iterations, L2 scaling, and application innovations are progressing steadily, while the short-term price correction of ETH reflects more the swings in risk appetite rather than the technical progress, further widening the gap between technological advancements and price performance.
Under the Shadow of Price Correction: ETH
● Intensifying contrast in market conditions: During this round of increased volatility in the cryptocurrency market, the price of ETH has clearly come under pressure, contrasting sharply with the robust performance of on-chain fundamentals. In the context of a collective weakening of top market cap assets, ETH, as a high Beta asset, has amplified the pressure effect, with the price curve declining while on-chain indicators remain flat or even slightly strengthen, creating a typical "strong data, weak quotes" anomaly.
● Amplifiers of sentiment and macro risks: Short-term sentiment fluctuations and changes in macro risk appetite have become the main amplifiers of selling pressure on ETH. When liquidity expectations tighten and interest rate paths are unclear, high-volatility assets are the first to be reduced. The rebalancing of funds across the entire market has forced ETH to bear the pressure of "collateral selling" even without signs of fundamental collapse, further exaggerating the divergence between technical and emotional aspects.
● "Excessive punishment" without disaster signals: From the existing public information, Ethereum has not released any "disaster-level" fundamental signals such as major security incidents, consensus failures, or core protocol malfunctions. Although there is competition and iterative pressure within the ecosystem, it is far from the point of re-evaluating the underlying logic. Even so, ETH has experienced a decline in this round of adjustments that does not fully match its on-chain reality, exhibiting typical "excessive punishment" characteristics, indicating that pricing power has clearly shifted towards sentiment and liquidity in the short term, rather than the network's practical value.
BitMine Purchases 20,000 ETH
● Data and sources of counter-cyclical buying: According to a single source, BitMine made a move during the price decline phase, purchasing 20,000 ETH in one go for about $46.04 million. This counter-cyclical accumulation action stands out in a market environment characterized by cold sentiment; the information itself still requires more channels for cross-verification, but at the narrative level, it has been seen as one of the signals of "institutions re-pricing Ethereum's long-term value at low levels."
● Long-term voting and short-term helplessness: Large-scale accumulation during a price decline is often interpreted as a strong vote of confidence in the long-term value of the asset. BitMine's purchase of ETH in the tens of millions locks in its position in the current range, essentially betting that Ethereum will continue to occupy a core position in public chains and DeFi infrastructure over the next few years. However, this "smart money" layout affects the medium to long-term structure more, with limited buffering effects on short-term price fluctuations, making it difficult to immediately reverse the market's downward inertia.
● Dislocation of smart money and panic selling: The divergence between institutional counter-cyclical entry and emotional selling by retail investors reinforces the classic narrative of "smart money buying, panic selling." The price of ETH accelerated its correction amid panic selling, while large funds on-chain and off-chain chose to absorb the selling pressure, tearing the market into two distinctly different perspectives: one focused on candlestick charts and liquidation data, the other gradually accumulating around computing power, TVL, and protocol revenue.
Gold Tokens and Mining Company Bonds: Another Perspective
● PAXG launch and connection to risk-hedging demand: Robinhood recently launched the gold token PAXG, providing its users with a channel to hold and trade gold exposure in token form. This move aligns with the demand for the integration of traditional safe-haven assets and cryptocurrency trading scenarios, allowing users to switch positions between stocks, crypto assets, and gold tokens within the same account, completing the reorganization of hedging and speculation in one interface.
● Silver price increase and narrative resonance: Spot silver recorded an increase of about 11%-12% in a single month, reinforcing the safe-haven attributes of precious metals in the current macro context. The price performance of gold and silver reflects on the on-chain gold token products, leading the market to imagine: when traditional precious metal markets heat up, will the mirrored on-chain tokens derive new speculation and hedging strategies in cryptocurrency exchanges and applications, further blurring the boundaries between "traditional assets" and "on-chain assets"?
● Mining bonds and traditional capital channels: Bitcoin mining company Cipher Mining plans to issue up to $2 billion in senior secured notes, continuing to raise funds for expansion through traditional capital markets. For mining companies, bonds remain a mature tool for obtaining long-term funding and expanding global computing power layouts. This shows that even as crypto assets face pressure in the secondary market, related infrastructure companies are still utilizing the traditional financial system for counter-cyclical layouts.
Fragmented Market Narrative: Risk-hedging Sentiment
● Polarization of capital preferences: On one end, funds are flowing towards assets related to gold, silver, and mining bonds, utilizing the precious metals and bond yield spreads to hedge against macro uncertainty; on the other end, blue-chip assets among crypto-native assets, such as ETH, are being significantly reduced amid volatility and emotional outbursts. These two capital flows run parallel but have created a huge gap in asset performance.
● Public chain expansion and price discount: Public chains like Ethereum continue to expand in terms of technical routes and actual usage, with L2 ecosystems extending and DeFi and application layer innovations not stalling, but this expansion has not translated into price premiums in the short term. The "intrinsic prosperity" formed by the active developer community and users contrasts with the "external gloom" reflected in secondary market quotes, creating a structural discount, further amplifying the sense of misalignment where "the more public chains do, the less they rise" in this round of market conditions.
● Multiple misalignments of hedging, speculation, and sentiment: The current market structure is a product of the overlay of misalignments between hedging and speculation, on-chain fundamentals, and secondary market sentiment. On one hand, funds are reconstructing hedging portfolios through gold tokens, silver market trends, and mining company bonds, while on the other hand, they are conducting discounted selling of risk assets like Ethereum. Sentiment has chosen short-term hedging, while technology is building momentum for the long term; this narrative tear makes the market seem both like it is accelerating its escape and quietly reconstructing its allocation.
Will Prices Eventually Align with Fundamentals?
Ethereum's robust on-chain data, combined with institutional counter-cyclical accumulation including BitMine during price pressure, provides realistic support for long-term bulls. However, in the foreseeable short term, ETH's volatility is still more easily dominated by sentiment, interest rate expectations, and overall liquidity. The market is not ignoring Ethereum's technology and network effects but is choosing to impose a higher degree of discount on such high-volatility assets during uncertain cycles.
At the same time, the accelerated integration of traditional financial products and crypto assets has provided funds with unprecedented diversified paths: they can allocate risk-hedging assets through gold tokens like PAXG or participate in the expansion of crypto infrastructure through Cipher Mining's $2 billion notes. This richness in tool dimensions enhances the financial depth of the crypto industry while also intensifying the diversion and rotation of capital among different assets.
In the future, when the current round of emotional outbursts calms down, there is a high probability that funds will return to examining on-chain fundamentals and actual usage data. The continued busyness of the Ethereum network, the resilience of TVL, and the medium to long-term layouts of institutions may re-enter the valuation framework. However, the timing and path of this process of "price aligning with fundamentals" are highly uncertain, and what investors can do may just be to acknowledge the existence of this misalignment and cautiously assess whether they are following panic or standing on the same side as the fundamentals.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
