In the East 8 Time Zone this week, international gold and silver prices experienced a significant correction, triggering a collective repricing of traditional safe-haven assets. The on-chain SILVER derivative contracts, which are highly correlated, subsequently faced concentrated liquidations, with a total network clearing scale of approximately $70.52 million in a single day. Among them, a whale's long position on the Hyperliquid platform was directly liquidated for about $18 million, amplifying the price impact in a short time. This article will analyze the cross-market shock path triggered by the precious metal correction based on publicly available on-chain and platform data, and assess the risk spillover degree of the related leverage structure.

Gold and Silver Plunge: Traditional Safe-Haven Asset Sentiment Reversal

● Precious metal prices have recently seen a sharp correction, with international spot gold and silver both reversing their previous strong upward expectations, significantly impacting the traditional "safe-haven asset" image on an emotional level. Due to the rapid amplitude and pace of this round of volatility, the market consensus that "gold and silver can hedge risks" was broken in a short time, triggering a reassessment of funds across the entire commodity and derivative chain.

● This rapid price reversal first spilled over on an emotional level, with traders actively reducing positions in high-volatility assets and increasing hedge positions. The related trading logic simultaneously transmitted to the crypto derivatives market. Some funds that originally hedged risks through precious metals chose to reduce leverage on-chain, causing short-term selling pressure to rise in the crypto market, increasing volatility, and leading to an overall drop in risk appetite.

● As a result, the gold and silver correction became the direct trigger point for this round of cross-market risk sentiment shift, laying the groundwork for the subsequent large-scale chain liquidations on-chain. Given that the precious metals and crypto markets share some funding sources, trader groups, and similar leverage structures, a seemingly "localized" adjustment in traditional assets quickly evolved into a multi-market coordinated risk event.

SILVER Contracts $70.52 Million…

● According to on-chain and trading platform statistics, the total liquidation scale of SILVER-related contracts during this round of volatility was approximately $70.52 million, with liquidations highly concentrated in the period of rapid decline in precious metal prices. This "time-intensive" liquidation characteristic exacerbated the instantaneous withdrawal of market depth, making contract prices more sensitive to spot volatility, further amplifying short-term slippage and price breaches.

● In individual platform cases, a whale address on Hyperliquid had a SILVER long position liquidated all at once for about $18 million. The impact of this single-point risk event on market sentiment far exceeded its nominal amount. The passive clearing of such a large long position not only directly smashed through local buy orders but also created a "panic sample" in the community and market terminals, prompting other high-leverage investors to reduce positions either passively or actively.

● The total network liquidation data corroborates this platform whale liquidation case, exposing structural issues in the leverage level and position concentration of SILVER derivatives. The high leverage and concentrated large orders in SILVER contracts make it easy for prices to trigger a "single-point stampede—global diffusion" chain reaction once they reverse, with the risk amplification effect significantly stronger than the fundamental volatility of the underlying asset itself.

Cross-Market Leverage Resonance: From Precious Metals…

● While precious metals were experiencing dramatic fluctuations, there were also more aggressive risk plays on-chain: a whale account was reported to have shorted 24.33 BTC with approximately 40x leverage, attempting to capitalize on the reversal of gold and silver sentiment by betting on a synchronous or amplified correction in Bitcoin prices. Such high leverage combined with a significant nominal position magnifies individual market judgments into potential impacts on overall liquidity.

● This indicates that the risk impact in the gold and silver markets has already transcended the realm of precious metals themselves, spreading to mainstream crypto assets like Bitcoin through sentiment and capital migration. Some speculative funds that were originally pressured in precious metal contracts chose to shift towards opening directional high-leverage positions in BTC and mainstream coins, attempting to "amplify profits" on higher volatility assets, but the objective result increased the sensitivity and fragility of mainstream coin price volatility.

● When both sides of precious metals and mainstream crypto coins have high leverage positions and traders are highly overlapping, any severe correction on one side will trigger passive liquidations or margin pressure on the other side. The intertwining of this round of precious metal corrections and high-leverage short positions in BTC has reinforced the cross-asset price linkage as an "emotional amplifier," significantly increasing market clearing risks near key price levels.

How the Liquidation Waterfall Was Triggered: Leverage…

● From a structural perspective, on-chain SILVER and similar varieties are largely dominated by high-leverage, high-concentration speculative positions, with generally limited risk tolerance and margin redundancy. Once the underlying price experiences a rapid, one-directional reversal, many accounts' margin buffers are instantly exhausted, triggering a cascading liquidation under automated risk control rules, forming a typical "liquidation waterfall."

● The traditionally "localized" market fluctuations, when combined with similar trading logic and shared capital pools on-chain, will transfer pressure to crypto derivatives through mechanisms like margin calls and risk limit adjustments. The result is that a sharp drop in the precious metals market is misread on-chain as a precursor to a larger-scale risk event, evolving into a liquidation cascade covering multiple varieties.

● As market opinions suggest, "this round of gold and silver corrections has become a typical sample of cross-market risk sentiment and leverage structure resonance," with implications far beyond a mere price fluctuation. The event exposes the systemic vulnerabilities under the current multi-market shared funding and high-leverage structure: any extreme market condition in one link can potentially transmit through chain reactions to other assets, rather than being an isolated occurrence.

External Signals Undercurrents: Crypto Stocks Weaken…

● It is worth noting that beyond on-chain liquidations, traditional capital markets are also releasing corresponding risk signals—U.S. pre-market crypto concept stocks are generally weakening, with related assets broadly declining, indicating that traditional capital's risk appetite for crypto-related assets is cooling. The timing of stock price adjustments and on-chain liquidation rhythms highly coincides, forming a realistic annotation for the "risk asset deleveraging cycle" that has begun.

● Meanwhile, the industry itself has not halted its product and compliance layout: Bitget Wallet has launched the U.S. regulated USA₮, while Bybit plans to launch Echelon (ELON) spot trading on February 2. The platform is still expanding its business boundaries through new products and compliant assets. On one side, there is a dramatic contraction in prices and leverage, while on the other, there is a continuous laying of infrastructure and compliant assets.

● The simultaneous occurrence of price shocks and new product launches reflects the contradictory state of the current crypto industry: short-term risks are concentrated in trading layers, while long-term fundamental construction is still progressing steadily. For market participants, this situation of "construction and volatility coexisting" means that one cannot be completely swayed by short-term emotions, nor can one ignore the structural risks lurking in high-volatility windows.

What We Learned from This Round of Liquidations: The Next…

● This event indicates that a bidirectional linkage has formed between precious metals and crypto derivatives in terms of sentiment and leverage, and the traditional notion of "safe-haven assets" is no longer an isolated safe island unrelated to the crypto world. When gold and silver experience dramatic fluctuations, on-chain SILVER contracts and high-leverage positions in mainstream crypto coins may become the first pressure points for risk spillover.

● For traders, the key is not to predict which asset the next black swan will come from, but to identify the weak links in the cross-market leverage chain, especially the concentration of single-point whale positions and their influence on overall liquidity. Avoiding blindly following high-leverage popular assets and steering clear of "fragile nodes" that could trigger waterfall liquidations once they reverse is more important than short-term directional judgments.

● Looking ahead, similar cross-market resonances are most likely to occur in time windows where macro significant events, high-volatility commodities, and high-leverage on-chain contracts overlap. Whether it is precious metals, crude oil, or mainstream crypto assets, once bound to high leverage and concentrated capital positions, any abnormal fluctuations on one side could ignite a chain liquidation. Proactively tightening leverage and diversifying exposure in such windows will be the core defense line against the next "gold and silver-style" liquidation storm.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。