From January 20 to 25, in UTC+8, Strategy Company made another significant move, investing approximately $264.1 million to increase its holdings by 2,932 BTC in just a few days, bringing its total holdings to 712,647 BTC, with a cumulative cost of approximately $54.19 billion. This investment occurred during a period when Bitcoin had retraced over 10% from its high of about $97,850, and the spot buying momentum had clearly weakened, highlighting a stark contrast between institutional buying and cooling market sentiment. This article will analyze this set of cost and price data, capital flows, and resistance signals to determine whether this round of accumulation is a strong bet or a high-risk, low-reward position, and assess its reference value and limitations for the medium to short-term market.
The Range and Rhythm of the $264.1 Million Purchase
● Accumulation Scale: During this period from January 20 to 25, Strategy added 2,932 BTC with an investment of $264.1 million, which in absolute terms still constitutes a large institutional order, sufficient to disturb market liquidity and sentiment in a single phase. Given its total holdings of over 700,000 BTC, this increase is not extreme in proportion to its overall position, but the continued addition of spot exposure near high prices signals its willingness to amplify directional bets within the current range.
● Average Purchase Price and Data Source: According to a single source, the average purchase price for this round of accumulation is approximately $90,061 per BTC, which roughly falls in the middle of the current retracement range, providing a reference for analyzing its cost and risk-return profile. However, it is important to emphasize that this average price currently comes from a single data source and lacks cross-verification from multiple on-chain or regulatory documents, so investors should remain cautious in their interpretation and avoid viewing it as an exact operational cost line.
● Price Level and Retracement Magnitude: According to Bitfinex Alpha data, Bitcoin reached a high of about $97,850 in mid-January before retracing over 10%. Based on this, it is likely that Strategy's purchases occurred after the price had pulled back from its historical high but was still in a relatively high range. This suggests that the accumulation is more akin to a high-level addition during a trend continuation phase rather than a panic buy after a market crash, indicating higher requirements for price tolerance and holding period.
The Implications of Holding 712,647 BTC and Cost Basis
● Base Holdings and Cost Scale: The latest data shows that Strategy currently holds approximately 712,647 BTC, ranking among the top in publicly visible institutional holdings, with a cumulative investment cost of approximately $54.19 billion. This position itself has created a significant locking effect on the spot market, laying a quantitative foundation for analyzing its overall cost range, unrealized profit space, and impact on market structure.
● Average Cost and Unrealized Profit Assessment: By dividing the $54.19 billion total cost by 712,647 BTC, we can roughly estimate its comprehensive holding cost to be around $76,000 per BTC (this is only a range-level estimate). Given that Bitcoin has experienced a rise to about $97,850 and a subsequent pullback of over 10%, even if the current price has slightly retreated, its overall position is still likely in the unrealized profit zone rather than close to the total cost line, indicating that Strategy's current risk is more from profit taking rather than pressure on the principal.
● Spot Locking and Circulating Chips: With over 700,000 BTC concentrated in a single institutional account for the long term, this effectively implements a continuous "drain" on the market supply side, weakening the scale of tradable chips in the public market. From a liquidity perspective, such a large locked position raises the threshold for deep liquidity, making it more costly for subsequent large purchases to drive up prices, while also contributing to a certain degree of building a medium to long-term support band below the price, enhancing the market's perception that "chips are not easily loosened."
● Motivations Cannot Be Speculated and Behavioral Profile: Although continuous high-level accumulation is often interpreted by the market as an optimistic bet on long-term trends, in the absence of information on the company's funding source structure, internal risk control constraints, and specific strategic goals, outsiders cannot concretely deduce its accumulation motivations. What can be inferred is based on its historical behavior pattern of favoring the expansion of spot positions and tolerating high volatility, suggesting a risk preference leaning towards long-term directional allocation rather than short-term speculation. However, any deeper subjective speculation exceeds the boundaries of the data itself.
Institutional Expansion Amidst a 10% Price Drop and Market Contraction
● Objective Benchmark for Adjustment Magnitude: The Bitfinex Alpha report indicates that after Bitcoin peaked at about $97,850 in mid-January, the retracement has exceeded 10%. This scale of pullback is not considered an extreme crash in historical cycles but is sufficient to trigger some short-term bulls to take profits and for risk-averse funds to withdraw. In this volatile context, Strategy's choice to increase its spot position stands out as particularly notable in an overall cautious market environment.
● Spot Buying and ETF Fund Flows: Research briefs show that the current stage of Bitcoin is characterized by weakening spot buying momentum and increasing outflow pressure from ETF products, reflecting that some funds that previously entered through compliant channels are now choosing to exit or wait and see. From a capital perspective, this is a typical pattern of "weak incremental growth and loosening existing positions," which suppresses the price's ability to continue rising at high levels and amplifies sensitivity to liquidity and depth of buying.
● Orderly Contraction of Derivative Positions: Unlike the outflows in the spot and ETF markets, the derivatives market has not experienced a severe wave of forced liquidations but has shown characteristics of orderly position adjustments. This means that both long and short leveraged positions are more about reducing leverage multiples and shrinking nominal positions, rather than falling into unilateral squeezes or cascading liquidations. Overall, market sentiment leans towards risk contraction and risk-neutral management rather than complete panic selling, leaving room for further price declines.
● Contrast Between Institutional Expansion and Market Caution: In this environment, Strategy's choice to expand its spot exposure with $264.1 million goes against the trend, akin to increasing long positions while the market is reducing leverage. This creates tension between "overall capital tending to be cautious or flowing out" and "individual leading institutions amplifying directional positions," which supports the bullish narrative on one hand while also increasing the sensitivity of its own position to subsequent price trajectories.
Buy Zone from the Perspective of Bitfinex Resistance
● Framework of Key Resistance Above: Bitfinex Alpha has provided an analysis of the key resistance zone above Bitcoin, indicating that there is still considerable selling pressure and profit-taking willingness above the current price. Although the report did not disclose precise point ranges, it can be confirmed that the current price is not far from the main resistance area, but has entered a dense trading zone that requires stronger incremental capital to effectively push prices through.
● Average Price Range and Resistance Overlap: Under the assumption of an average price of $90,061 per BTC from a single source, Strategy's recent accumulation is roughly located in the area that has retraced from the high of $97,850, but has not moved far from the upper resistance zone. In other words, its positioning resembles absorbing chips at the lower edge to middle of the main resistance zone, rather than waiting for a deeper price retracement to take on positions at lower levels, which creates a more symmetrical relationship between its short-term paper loss space and potential pressure zones above.
● Can Counter-Trend Accumulation Drive a Breakthrough: In an environment of continuous net outflows from ETFs and weak spot buying, even a single large institution may find it difficult to change the overall direction of the supply-demand structure, let alone guarantee a price breakthrough through all resistance zones. Strategy's counter-trend accumulation is more about providing marginal buying support and slowing the pace of retracement, while the ability to form an upward breakthrough still heavily relies on whether there will be new institutions and capital inflows forming a collective force, rather than solely depending on a single entity's accumulation behavior.
● Resistance and Average Price Only Represent Value for Money: It is important to note that comparing resistance levels with the average purchase price of this round can only help investors understand the risk-return structure they are assuming, such as the ratio of potential space above to the tolerance for retracement below. This analysis does not imply a definitive judgment on short-term price direction; what truly influences the trend are multidimensional factors such as capital inflows and outflows, macro risk preferences, and market depth. Any single resistance zone or average price line cannot constitute a definitive "breakthrough or reversal" signal.
From Following to Independence: An Observational Framework for Ordinary Investors
● The Signal Meaning of High-Level Locking for Retail Investors: When Strategy continues to lock in positions while prices are still close to historical highs, many retail investors may easily interpret this as a strong confirmation of "long-term bullishness." However, on the other hand, this also reflects that institutions have a much higher tolerance for severe pullbacks compared to individual investors, as they can tolerate larger floating losses and time retracements, while ordinary investors often struggle to replicate this due to leverage, funding sources, and holding periods. Therefore, one cannot simply equate their operations with "risk-free bullish support."
● Data-Driven Rather Than Emotional Imitation: For ordinary investors, a more feasible path is to build a data-driven observational framework, such as continuously tracking the changes in Strategy's publicly disclosed positions, the inflows and outflows of ETF funds, and the basis changes between spot and derivatives, to assess the phase shifts in market risk preferences, rather than emotionally following large single purchases without considering their own capital scale and risk tolerance boundaries.
● Data Uncertainty and Lag: The average purchase price of $90,061 for this accumulation currently comes from a single source, which may have statistical discrepancies and may not reflect all transaction details synchronously. If investors attempt to use this as an exact coordinate to "replicate the strategy," they must face the time lag of information release and accept the reality that the data itself may contain biases. Therefore, a more reasonable approach is to view it as a rough reference range rather than an exact operational template.
● Institutional Information Advantages and Blind Spots: Additionally, Strategy possesses institutional advantages far exceeding those of retail investors in terms of funding costs, internal risk control thresholds, and decision-making processes, and this key information is missing from the outside. If ordinary investors absolutize its single accumulation behavior as a "directional beacon" while ignoring these structural differences, they may find themselves under psychological and financial pressure that is difficult to match during periods of volatility. Therefore, moving from following to independence, what truly needs to be strengthened is one's own risk management and information discernment capabilities, rather than excessive reliance on the behavior of a single institution.
Signals and Blind Spots of Institutional High-Level Locking
Against the backdrop of Bitcoin retracing over 10% from its high of about $97,850, weakening spot buying momentum, and continuous outflows from ETFs, Strategy still utilized $264.1 million to increase its holdings by 2,932 BTC from January 20 to 25, raising its total holdings to 712,647 BTC, demonstrating its continued bullish outlook on Bitcoin's medium to long-term value and its willingness to amplify long positions in a high-volatility range. From a data perspective, this round of new positions, with an overall cost of approximately $54.19 billion, a price retracement of over 10%, and the upper resistance zone, collectively outline the risk-return structure faced by institutions at this stage: there is historical cost and locked positions forming medium to long-term support below, while above there is short-term uncertainty brought about by capital outflows and resistance zones.
It is important to clarify that institutional heavy positions and lock-ups at high levels do indeed add elements of scarcity and mainstream capital endorsement to the long-term bull market narrative, but this does not automatically equate to a short-term price that must strengthen unilaterally. Short-term market conditions will still be influenced by a dynamic interplay of capital flows, adjustments in derivatives leverage, and key resistance levels, and any single accumulation event is insufficient to eliminate the risks of volatility or even deep pullbacks. For investors, a more robust approach is to focus on data and risk management, recognizing on one hand the potential support that institutional lock-ups may bring to the market's bottom structure, while also acknowledging the blind spots created by information asymmetry, lack of clarity on funding sources, and risk control boundaries. Investors should build positions and cycles that suit their own capital and risk tolerance, rather than simplifying institutional behavior into "mindless bullishness" or the sole guiding principle.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
