On January 26, in the UTC+8 time zone, a whale address that has been active for four years completed a directional asset swap between WETH and WBTC for the second time this month, once again drawing market attention. This address executed a large asset exchange on January 3 and January 26, first swapping from ETH to WBTC and then reversing the transaction from WBTC back to WETH, completing two rounds of trading at different ETH/BTC exchange rates. According to on-chain data, after these two operations, the address's ETH holdings achieved a net increase of 6.45%, currently holding approximately 17,707 WETH and 195.49 WBTC, with a total position of about 67.38 million USD. However, while this whale was using real money to increase its ETH position, Bloomberg senior strategist Mike McGlone publicly emphasized that ETH is more likely to fall below 2000 USD rather than return to 4000 USD, creating a stark contrast between the bullish on-chain behavior and the bearish price narrative.
Two Swap Timing: 0.034…
● Swap Details Breakdown: According to Planet Daily and Rhythm Data, on January 3, this whale exchanged 14,145.93 WETH for 492.16 WBTC at an exchange rate of 0.03479 ETH/BTC, with a nominal value of about 44.195 million USD, achieving a large-scale switch from ETH to WBTC. On January 26, the address again exchanged 578.66 WBTC for 17,706.74 WETH at a lower rate of 0.03268 ETH/BTC, with a single transaction size of about 50.33 million USD, completing a larger swap in the opposite direction.
● Net Increase Quantification: Structurally, the first operation involved selling ETH for WBTC when ETH was relatively "expensive" compared to BTC, while the second operation involved selling BTC for more ETH when ETH was relatively "cheaper." Both swaps were locked in the range of 0.03479 and 0.03268, allowing the address to reduce ETH at a high price and then increase ETH at a low price, achieving a net growth of approximately 6.45% in ETH quantity while keeping the nominal USD market value roughly similar or slightly increased, reflecting a precise game based on the relative price of ETH/BTC.
● Relative Value Approach: From a trading logic perspective, this is a typical relative value trading strategy of "selling ETH for WBTC at high prices and reversing to buy back ETH at low prices," rather than a simple directional bet. The whale did not simply go long on a single asset but viewed ETH as a relatively overvalued asset at high ETH/BTC rates and exchanged it for WBTC, then bought back more ETH after the rate fell, thereby amplifying its ETH position without significantly increasing its USD exposure. This model highlights its sensitivity to exchange rate ranges and its ability to exploit short-term volatility.
Four-Year-Old Address Takes Action: 67.38…
● Long-Term Holding Background: On-chain analysis shows that this address has existed for about four years, known for holding large amounts of ETH long-term, playing more of a "chip accumulation" role rather than being a high-frequency trader. At the beginning of this year, the address unusually switched a large amount of ETH to WBTC for the first time, breaking its long-standing "wait-and-see" status with the over 44 million USD swap on January 3, indicating a phase change in its attitude towards the relative performance of ETH and BTC.
● Current Holding Structure: After two large directional swaps, the address currently holds approximately 17,707 WETH and 195.49 WBTC, with a total market value of about 67.38 million USD. Compared to the position at the time of the first swap at the beginning of the year, the amount of ETH has significantly rebounded to a new high, while WBTC remains at a relatively small but still considerable scale, with the overall structure leaning more towards ETH. This rhythm of "first reducing then increasing" suggests that it is using WBTC as an intermediate transition asset to complete a stepwise accumulation of ETH chips within the relative price difference.
● Preference Signals and Restraint Boundaries: The shift from "no action for a long time" to "two consecutive large swaps" suggests that this address is more optimistic about ETH's relative performance against BTC in the medium to long term, at least willing to bet heavily on the ETH side within the current price difference range. However, in the absence of real identity information, specific models, and internal decision-making logic, outsiders can only interpret preferences based on publicly available on-chain behavior, unable to extrapolate its complete strategy path or precise costs, nor can they infer subsequent operations.
Bloomberg's Bearish Outlook Contrasts Whale's Accumulation: 2…
● Macroeconomic Bearish View: Bloomberg senior strategist Mike McGlone recently pointed out in a research report that "Ethereum's price seems to be running towards the lower end of the 2000-4000 USD range, with a higher risk of falling below 2000 USD than returning to 4000 USD." This statement continues his overall view that crypto assets are under pressure in a tightening environment, categorizing ETH as one of the assets more susceptible to liquidity contraction and risk appetite cooling, resonating within institutional circles.
● On-Chain Signal Interpretation: In contrast, Planet Daily emphasized that the address achieved a net increase in ETH holdings through two swaps, indicating its more favorable view of ETH relative to BTC. In other words, even if the absolute price may face volatility risks, this on-chain whale still chose to "stand with Ethereum" in the ETH/BTC dimension, betting on the relative value's repair or outperformance in future phases by increasing the number of ETH chips.
● Discrepancy in Narrative Systems: This discrepancy is represented on one side by institutional strategists like Bloomberg, who provide conservative judgments from the perspective of macro liquidity, interest rate cycles, and stock risk premiums; on the other side, large on-chain players are directly betting on the future performance of ETH/BTC with real funds in the hundreds of millions. The former relies on top-down narratives and models, while the latter expresses attitudes through traceable trading records, leading to clear misalignments in time dimensions, risk tolerance, and information sources, forcing the market to choose between "price bearishness" and "on-chain bullishness."
Dramatic Exchange Rate Fluctuations: ETH to B…
● Volatility Environment Description: Since the beginning of January, the ETH/BTC exchange rate has gradually declined from around 0.03479 to the 0.03268 level, with a short-term pullback of nearly 6%. For traders primarily referencing relative prices, this volatility means that ETH has appeared at a discount when priced in BTC, providing a window to capture price differences through directional swaps. The whale's two swaps coincidentally occurred near the high and low points of this volatility, utilizing short-term dramatic swings to rebalance its position.
● Risks and Rewards of Swapping: In this volatility, using directional swaps between WBTC and WETH to amplify chip quantities is essentially a relative value trade with a leverage effect. If the judgment is correct, as in this case where ETH was sold at 0.03479 and then bought back at 0.03268, it can achieve an approximately 6.45% increase in ETH quantity while keeping the overall USD exposure change limited; however, if the exchange rate continues to move unfavorably, it may fall into the dilemma of "selling too early or bottom-fishing too soon," bearing opportunity costs or even actual floating losses, thus requiring extremely high timing and rhythm precision.
● Guidance on Rotational Sentiment: From a broader market capital flow perspective, such directional swaps based on the ETH/BTC exchange rate are often seen as potential leading signals of capital rotation between BTC and ETH. When a large address chooses to increase its ETH position in the face of relative weakness and significantly increases its holdings, it can easily be interpreted as an expectation for future phase repairs or even "catch-up" for ETH. Although this behavior cannot directly determine market direction, it can create a guiding effect on other funds in terms of sentiment.
On-Chain Capital Game Upgrade: From Whales…
● Aggressive Capital Cases: In contrast to this long-term whale, aggressive players such as 0x880a have also emerged on-chain with high-risk operations during the same period. According to public information, this address has hedged and traded around HYPE assets, making a profit of about 14.72 million USD in a short time, reflecting a starkly different risk preference and trading cycle—more inclined to utilize narratives and volatility for short-term high-beta asset speculation rather than making structural adjustments around mainstream assets.
● Style and Signal Comparison: The steady swaps of long-term whales and the high-leverage sprints of short-term capital form the two poles of the current on-chain capital game. The former, based on a four-year holding background, conducts rhythmic directional swaps between ETH and BTC, releasing a medium to long-term judgment on the relative value of mainstream assets; the latter frequently enters and exits in Memecoins and thematic coins, seizing extreme sentiment and liquidity explosions. The simultaneous occurrence of these two behaviors on-chain indicates that the market contains both funds pursuing stable relative returns and high-risk capital seeking excess returns.
● Activity and Risk Preference Assessment: From the cross-section of multiple on-chain entities' behaviors, the trading activity and complexity surrounding ETH are increasing: on one side, whales are amplifying ETH chips through swaps between WBTC and WETH, while on the other side, aggressive addresses are hedging and speculating with high-volatility assets closely related to the ETH ecosystem. This multi-layered participation structure reflects the current attractiveness of ETH-related assets and suggests that overall risk preferences have risen compared to earlier stages, requiring investors to pay more attention to position management and volatility tolerance.
Price Bearishness vs. On-Chain Bullishness: ET…
● Conflict of Bullish and Bearish Signals: In summary, on one hand, Bloomberg strategist Mike McGlone emphasizes the price bearish narrative that ETH is more likely to fall below 2000 USD, while on the other hand, a four-year-old address has achieved a net increase of 6.45% in ETH chips and a total position of 67.38 million USD through two directional swaps. The divergence between institutional research and on-chain capital regarding ETH's future performance constitutes the most tension-filled hedging signal in the current market, forcing investors to reassess the reliability of a single viewpoint.
● Clarification of Cognitive Boundaries: It is important to emphasize that external observers cannot obtain the true identity, complete strategy framework, or historical cost basis of this whale, nor can they accurately predict whether it will continue to increase or decrease its position. Therefore, based on publicly available on-chain data, the best one can do is to interpret its current behavior and preferences relatively cautiously, rather than constructing a "script" with target prices and path extrapolations. Any approach that absolutizes the behavior of a single address as a "certain guide" will amplify the risk of misinterpretation.
● Insights for Investors: In an environment where macro narratives and on-chain data contradict each other, investors need to build their own decision-making framework: first, view institutional perspectives as part of the macro scenario rather than the only truth; second, treat whale swaps and other on-chain behaviors as important but not absolute "voting data," weighing them against their own risk preferences and cycle judgments; third, when observing high-recognition events like whales increasing their positions, they should reflect on their own position management and expectations rather than simply following suit. Only by maintaining independent thinking in a multi-source information environment can investors make relatively rational choices in a market intertwined with bullish and bearish signals.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
