In this week's trading under the East 8 Time Zone, the leverage risk in the Ethereum derivatives market has rapidly converged, with prices repeatedly tugging in the range of approximately $3,100 to $3,300. Around this narrow range, long and short funds are confronting each other through futures, stETH leverage structures, and large whale positions. High leverage positions intertwined with potential liquidation risks amplify the market's sensitivity to every price fluctuation.
Current data indicates that on one end, there are whales holding tens of thousands of ETH short positions with considerable unrealized profits, while on the other end, there are stETH longs leveraging through complex staking and lending. Additionally, the estimated scale of ETH futures open contracts is in the billions of dollars. In such a highly leveraged environment, the $3,100 to $3,300 range is viewed by the market as the core battleground for both bulls and bears. Once the price breaks above or below this critical bandwidth, the risks of concentrated liquidations and chain reactions will be rapidly magnified.
Whale Short Pressure and Momentum Inertia
● Size of a single whale short: According to statistics, a certain whale holds approximately 30,639 ETH short positions in the derivatives market, with a nominal value of about $98.51 million, and current unrealized profits of about $1.7 million. Within the current volatile range of ETH, such a size is sufficient to create an expectation of "significant short pressure above" on an emotional level.
● Impact of unrealized profit status on behavior: As long as the price remains within the range of this short position and profit, the whale has some defensive space, allowing them to either continue "holding short" to bet on a deeper correction or to take partial profits at opportune moments. This state of being able to enter or exit reinforces the market's psychological expectation that "the shorts are willing to continue absorbing upward rebounds."
● Directional guidance for short-term volatility: When the price approaches the potential pressure zone of the shorts, the market is more likely to interpret it as "encountering short selling pressure," leading short-term traders to tend to short or reduce chasing highs, thus aligning their mindset with the whale's direction and amplifying directional expectations of volatility, i.e., "upward movement becomes more difficult, while downward breaks accelerate."
● Historical samples of whale segment profits: The research brief mentions that a whale previously accumulated profits of about $96.67 million through segment trading of ETH, demonstrating that large funds profit by repeatedly buying low and selling high within key price ranges, utilizing market sentiment fluctuations. Such historical performance reinforces the market's perception of "whales being familiar with range trading strategies," increasing the psychological pressure of funds competing within the current $3,100 to $3,300 range.
● Connection between segment operations and the current range: When market capitalization expands in the short term, volatility rises, and whale shorts have entered the profit zone, the market often expects them to continue their existing segment habits by adjusting positions near key price levels, inducing chasing and panic selling, thereby amplifying the divergence and trading volume around that range.
Leverage Longs Entangled and Cross-Asset Chains
● Construction of stETH leverage structure: The brief shows that a new wallet address has established a position of 13,461 stETH through complex staking and lending operations. The typical path includes: first depositing ETH or stETH into a lending protocol as collateral, then repeatedly borrowing assets, repurchasing stETH, and re-collateralizing, thus forming a "circular leverage" long structure that makes the nominal position far exceed the original capital scale.
● Leverage attributes and pullback pressure: In such a structure, stETH longs are essentially tied to the price movement of ETH. Once the price of ETH significantly pulls back from its high, the value of the collateral declines simultaneously, deteriorating the health of the lending. If the collateral ratio reaches the protocol's safety threshold, it may trigger passive deleveraging, including forced partial or full liquidation. The current severe fluctuations of ETH in the $3,100 to $3,300 range make these high-leverage longs more likely to be on the "edge of safety," making them extremely sensitive to short-term declines.
● Passive deleveraging under tightening liquidity: When the overall market risk appetite declines, borrowing rates rise, or available liquidity tightens, the stETH leverage structure faces increased pressure on its chips, and some addresses may be forced to reduce positions early for self-rescue. If prices decline rapidly, concentrated selling may occur, further driving down prices and pushing more collateral positions to the liquidation line, forming a typical feedback loop of "drop → liquidation → more selling pressure."
● Cross-asset leverage risk transmission: The brief also mentions that another whale was liquidated on its DOGE position, incurring a loss of about $2.2 million, while still holding an unrealized loss position in ETH. This indicates that some large funds are layering leverage across multiple assets, and once a chain of one asset is detonated, they may need to reduce positions in other assets or close high-risk positions to cover losses, thereby transmitting pressure from DOGE to ETH and other varieties.
● Multi-asset resonance and emotional spillover: In a high-leverage environment, if a certain cryptocurrency experiences large liquidations or continuous pullbacks, it often weakens the overall market risk appetite. For leveraged funds simultaneously positioned in ETH and other high-volatility assets, a single point explosion can accelerate the deleveraging of the entire portfolio, thereby amplifying ETH's volatility near key price levels.
Futures Position Accumulation and Sensitivity to Key Ranges
● Open contract scale amplifying volatility: According to a single source estimate, ETH futures open interest (OI) is currently at the billions of dollars level. In the context of prices oscillating narrowly around $3,100 to $3,300, such a large volume of high-leverage contracts means that any moderate-sized unilateral capital flow can sufficiently pry open significant nominal position adjustments.
● Concentration of leverage and price sensitivity: Large long and short leverage positions often cluster around technical support levels, previous highs and lows, and round numbers for stop-loss and liquidation prices. Although there is currently a lack of precise data on specific liquidation points near $3,100 and $3,300, it can be confirmed that there is a significant scale of confrontation between longs and shorts around this bandwidth, making the "small price difference" correspond to a huge nominal exposure.
● Liquidation prices clustered but details missing: Due to the research brief clearly indicating the absence of relevant liquidation threshold data and prohibiting the fabrication of specific trigger points, it is impossible to provide an accurate scale of potential liquidations at any single price level. However, it can be reasonably inferred that the leverage positions of both longs and shorts are densely distributed around the $3,100 to $3,300 range, and once the market breaks above the upper limit or below the lower limit, the local price slippage and acceleration effects will be significantly magnified.
● Market consensus on liquidation risk: @jinseBTC's view states, "ETH leverage longs and shorts are in a high-stakes confrontation at key price levels, and liquidation risks are significant," which resonates with the current OI scale and volatility amplification effects. Although there is a lack of quantifiable amounts for chain liquidations, the market is generally aware that high leverage combined with concentrated price levels means that once the trend aligns, it is easy to shift from "range oscillation" to "unilateral expansion."
● Potential paths for chain reactions: If the price breaks through the key range in either direction, triggering a batch of leveraged positions to be passively liquidated, it may lead to two chain reaction paths: one is triggering same-direction stop-loss and chasing orders, further expanding short-term volatility; the other is causing some accounts' overall margin pressure to rise, forcing them to reduce positions in other cryptocurrency contracts, spreading volatility from ETH to a broader range of crypto assets.
Bitcoin Fund Outflow and Risk Appetite Switch
● CEX Bitcoin net outflow data: The research brief shows that in the past 24 hours, centralized exchanges have seen a total net outflow of about 1,729.96 BTC. This data reflects ongoing withdrawal sentiment and may also represent that some funds, after completing large liquidations and position reconstructions, are transferring remaining chips to on-chain or other venues to reduce immediate selling pressure within exchanges.
● Position reconstruction after large liquidations: The large liquidations that previously occurred in the Bitcoin market caused some contract accounts' margins to evaporate passively while releasing some leverage scale. After the liquidation is completed, some surviving funds may choose to reallocate exposure, including redistributing leverage ratios between mainstream assets like BTC and ETH, which will have a repricing effect on the overall derivatives market's risk appetite.
● Margin release and risk control adjustments: When BTC contracts are significantly deleveraged, the systemic margin pressure at the exchange level is alleviated, and some investors may, under controllable risk conditions, transfer margins from BTC to ETH or other high-volatility coins to seek higher elasticity. However, while panic sentiment has not fully dissipated, a considerable portion of funds may choose to reduce overall leverage multiples, resulting in a discrepancy between nominal position sizes and previous peaks.
● Possible paths for fund flow: Against the backdrop of ETH's total market capitalization recently increasing by about $9 billion, the market has begun to discuss whether there is a structural migration of "out of BTC → into ETH or other altcoins." Some BTC withdrawals may simply be long-term holders acting for safety or asset allocation considerations, not directly flowing into ETH, but another portion of derivative funds, after BTC deleveraging, indeed has the motivation to rebuild positions in ETH and other more narrative-driven assets.
● Impact on ETH volatility: If risk appetite funds shift leverage exposure from BTC to ETH, under the premise that ETH is already at high leverage and high OI, it will further increase ETH's volatility within the $3,100 to $3,300 range. On one hand, it will increase the intensity of squeezing during upward breaks; on the other hand, it will also exacerbate the risk of cascading sell-offs if the range is lost downward.
Driving Forces Behind Market Capitalization Surge
The time window in which ETH's total market capitalization increased by about $9 billion overlaps significantly with the whale segment profit records and the current large short pressure, leading the market to interpret these three factors together. The market capitalization increase provides whales with a higher nominal space, allowing them to amplify segment profits by increasing positions and adjusting directions, while the whales' repeated betting also drives trading and volatility, forming a cycle of "market capitalization expansion—segment intensification—leverage increase."
Regarding how much of this surge is driven by real cash buying rather than short-term squeezes propelled by high-leverage derivatives, the current data is incomplete. From what is known: on one hand, the increase in market capitalization coincides with high levels of futures OI, indicating that leveraged funds play a non-negligible role; on the other hand, there is insufficient public evidence showing that a similarly scaled long-term cash institutional fund has entered the market in large quantities to lock in positions. Therefore, the relative weight of cash buying versus derivative-driven momentum in this surge remains a significant point of contention.
In the absence of clear, quantifiable disclosures of the sources of incremental cash funds, the possibility of high leverage components being mixed into market capitalization expansion cannot be ignored. For traders, this means that the current price levels are highly sensitive to leverage structures: the seemingly "significant growth in market capitalization" may merely be the result of leveraged funds repeatedly betting within a relatively narrow chip pool. Once the market turns, the resulting deleveraging may rapidly reverse the previously accumulated market capitalization increase.
The Next Act of High-Leverage Betting
In summary, based on current information, Ethereum is layered with multiple levels of leverage structures within the $3,100 to $3,300 range: first, the whale holding 30,639 ETH short positions and the upper pressure expectation from its unrealized profit space; second, the 13,461 stETH leverage longs built through complex staking and lending, facing passive deleveraging risks during price pullbacks and tightening liquidity; third, the billions of dollars in ETH futures open contracts densely confronting near key price levels. These factors collectively create a breeding ground for systemic volatility risks, making any directional breakout potentially evolve into an amplified market movement.
It is important to emphasize that the current market public data lacks precise details on liquidation prices and position distribution, including key figures such as how much liquidation scale is triggered near $3,100 or $3,300, which have not been reliably disclosed and are explicitly prohibited from being fabricated by the research brief. Therefore, all judgments regarding the potential scale of chain liquidations carry significant uncertainty, remaining more at a qualitative level of "significant risk" and "intense confrontation," rather than being quantifiable risk models.
In such an environment, the more realistic advice for traders is: first, to control leverage multiples as much as possible, avoiding the addition of extreme leverage in an already highly leveraged market; second, to continuously monitor margin safety, regularly checking the liquidation price range and capital utilization rate of their positions, reserving sufficient buffer space to avoid being passively forced out due to short-term fluctuations; third, to pay attention to the changes in funding rates on major exchanges, using them as reference signals for sentiment and the tilt of long and short forces, rather than blindly following one side's extreme sentiment. Regarding whale direction, whether it is large short positions or leveraged longs, they should be viewed as risk information rather than "sure profit signals," as blindly following often results in being the one harvested during volatile fluctuations.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
