On January 3, 2025, Eastern Standard Time, the U.S. SEC escalated its regulatory actions regarding the Bitcoin Spot ETF. From the disclosure of Grayscale's spot ETF products to BlackRock's new round of material supplements, combined with the latest changes in futures ETF positions and on-chain funds, this round of ETF competition has once again become the main narrative in the crypto market. The process of ETFs gradually moving towards compliant assets is seen as one of the most critical bridges between traditional finance and crypto assets, and every swing from the regulatory side directly rewrites Bitcoin's funding structure and volatility path.

Regulatory Rhythm and ETF Event Context

● On the timeline, the first batch of Bitcoin spot ETFs in the U.S. was approved in January 2024. About a year later, the SEC began to impose higher requirements on product structure, market-making arrangements, and information disclosure, marking the transition from the "access" phase to the "fine-tuning regulatory period."
● Regarding Grayscale, after completing the historic conversion of GBTC to a spot ETF, its assets under management (AUM) once exceeded $20 billion. However, due to high fee rates and significant selling pressure in the secondary market, the SEC's ongoing inquiries into its liquidity and redemption arrangements became one of the key focuses of this round of regulation.
● Traditional giants like BlackRock continued to supplement the SEC with recruitment prospectuses, market maker lists, and risk disclosure terms throughout 2024, revising documents multiple times based on SEC feedback, reflecting a "repeated game—gradual convergence" path between institutions and regulators.
● The focus of regulators shifted from the initial "whether to approve" to "how to prevent manipulation, how to protect retail investors, and how to align with global anti-money laundering and tax frameworks," linking with the FATF travel rule and the OECD tax information exchange mechanism.

Fund Flows and Market Impact

● On the ETF funding side, since the beginning of 2024, the cumulative net inflow of Bitcoin spot ETFs in the U.S. stock market has been estimated by several institutions to be in the tens of billions of dollars, with products represented by BlackRock and Fidelity continuing to absorb traditional wealth management funds through a "low fee + strong channel" combination.
● In contrast, Grayscale products experienced a noticeable outflow during the fee and structural adjustment period, with net redemption pressure reaching over $100 million on some days, triggering a chain reaction of spot selling and price volatility.
● On the derivatives side, Bitcoin futures ETFs and CME futures positions expanded simultaneously during the intensive application and adjustment window for spot ETFs, with long and short leveraged funds accelerating their competition, and the number of open futures contracts increasing by several dozen percentage points before the ETF launch.
● On-chain data shows that research institutions have recorded a "first reduce and then replenish" rhythm in long-term holder wallets after the ETF approval: the proportion of long-held UTXOs significantly decreased initially, then gradually rebounded after price corrections and market digestion of the ETF, indicating that old funds are using liquidity windows for structural turnover.
● In terms of price performance, around several key regulatory nodes (such as the approval of the first batch of ETFs, the peak of Grayscale's reduction, and the SEC's new round of public inquiries), Bitcoin's daily volatility repeatedly expanded to the 8%–15% range, far exceeding traditional assets, but has converged compared to the extreme conditions of the previous bull market.

Deep Logic: Resonance of Compliant Funds and Crypto Narrative

The regulatory and funding fluctuations surrounding the Bitcoin spot ETF are not isolated events but resonate with the global trend of compliance and institutionalization. On one hand, the SEC has strengthened KYC/AML, manipulation prevention, and information disclosure requirements through continuous inquiries and document modifications regarding Grayscale, BlackRock, and other products, reinforcing Bitcoin's "financial commodity" attributes in the U.S. capital market. On the other hand, the tens of billions of dollars in net inflows into ETFs and the structural adjustments of long-term on-chain holdings indicate that traditional institutional funds are migrating from off-exchange trusts and OTC to ETF channels with higher transparency, more centralized regulation, and more standardized trading. For the crypto industry, the short-term severe price fluctuations reflect a long-term evolution of the narrative from "anarchic speculative assets" to "alternative asset allocation tools with compliant channels."

Bullish and Bearish Perspectives and Divergences

● Optimistic/Supporters: They believe that the SEC's continuous improvement of the regulatory framework and promotion of Bitcoin spot ETFs towards normalization is a structural positive. Reasons include:
● The tens of billions of dollars in compliant incremental funds will shift institutions from "watching" to "participating," thereby raising Bitcoin's underlying valuation center.
● ETFs provide traditional investors with a more familiar trading vehicle, allowing indirect holdings through brokerage accounts, retirement plans, etc., significantly broadening asset allocation boundaries.
● High-fee old products like Grayscale are being forced to optimize, promoting lower fees and concentrated liquidity, which is beneficial for the long-term healthy development of the market.
● Pessimistic/Worried: They emphasize the risks brought by regulatory strengthening and institutional concentration:
● The excessive concentration of ETFs in a few Wall Street giants means that the concept of "decentralized holding" of Bitcoin is diluted, with further trends towards concentration of holding weights and market pricing power.
● Frequent inquiries by the SEC and policy uncertainties can easily trigger panic selling at critical nodes, amplifying volatility and exposing retail investors to risks of chasing highs and cutting losses.
● If future regulations are deeply tied to global tax and anti-money laundering frameworks, the compliance and disclosure costs faced by ETF holders may continue to rise, weakening the willingness of some funds to allocate.

Future Outlook: Regulatory Implementation and Restructuring of Funding

In the short term, the market will continue to focus on the SEC's detailed requirements for existing Bitcoin spot ETF products, including market-making transparency, fee structure adjustments, information disclosure frequency, and coordination with global regulations. In the medium term, if net inflows into ETFs remain in the range of billions to tens of billions of dollars, Bitcoin's holding structure will further tilt towards "institutionalization + compliance," and the dynamic balance between long-term on-chain holdings and on-exchange ETF shares will become a core variable affecting price centers and volatility. For participants, understanding the regulatory rhythm and funding migration paths is more important than simply monitoring prices: what will truly determine the upper and lower limits of the market in the coming years is Bitcoin's institutional "position" in the global financial system, and every action the SEC takes regarding spot ETFs is a key annotation on this path.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。