Market Overview

Recently, Bitcoin has been repeatedly oscillating around the $87,000 mark on several leading trading platforms, with price discrepancies revealing the complexity of this level. OKX's BTC/USDT contract experienced a brief "spike," with the transaction price dipping to $86,963.10, technically breaking below the $87,000 integer level. However, some market sources and information platforms still show BTC fluctuating around $87,600–$87,800, with a price difference of nearly $800, sparking discussions about the matching and liquidity conditions across different platforms. From a longer-term perspective, Bitcoin's current spot price is approximately $87,686.7, with a 24-hour decline of about 2.08%, corresponding to a total market capitalization of about $1.75 trillion, reflecting its high volatility phase within historical high ranges. This round of fluctuations occurred around the Christmas holiday, when traditional financial markets were quiet, and some crypto participants were on vacation, leading to a noticeable decrease in order book thickness. In such a low liquidity environment, a 0.07% level drop over 5 minutes can be easily amplified by emotions, turning into a narrative of "breaking through a key level." The following sections will analyze the real driving factors and capital game structure behind this round of testing around $87,000 from three dimensions: news, capital, and sentiment.

News Context

Surrounding this round of fluctuations, the market has focused on two types of news: first, the capital flow of Bitcoin spot and futures ETFs; second, the concentrated expiration arrangements in the options market, such as Deribit, during the holiday period. Although social media widely circulates claims of "continuous net outflows from ETFs" and "large-scale options expiration crashing the market," there is currently no concrete data from public information to confirm the existence of abnormal redemption or concentrated position transfers, with most opinions remaining speculative. In the controversy over the "spike" and breaking below $87,000, there are also boundaries of information and data: OKX's quote clearly provided the low point of $86,963.10 and a 5-minute instantaneous drop of 0.07%, while other mainstream market sources recorded more of the usual fluctuations within the $85,000 to $90,000 range, with intraday transactions around $87,700 being more common. This difference in low point records between platforms likely stems from the depth of their respective liquidity pools, matching rules, and the impact of individual large orders during extreme moments, rather than a consistent trend across the entire market. On a macro level, the holiday period lacked significant macro data and regulatory events, creating a typical "news vacuum"; on a micro level, OKX and other exchanges focused on holiday marketing, welfare activities, and light-hearted messaging, creating an atmosphere of "diminishing volatility and enjoying the holiday." In contrast, the claims surrounding continuous ETF outflows and Deribit’s large-scale expiration crashing the market mostly remain at the level of community retelling and KOL commentary, lacking verifiable scale and timing evidence, and should be viewed as unverified market rumors rather than definitive factors for direct trading.

Capital and Structure

Structurally, Bitcoin has been oscillating back and forth within the $85,000 to $90,000 range for some time. With $85,000 as the lower edge and $90,000 as the upper edge, it roughly outlines the distribution of long and short capital and liquidity: near the lower edge, short-term and medium-term long positions often cluster with stop-loss and accumulation buy orders, while the upper edge overlaps with a large number of historical positions' potential profit-taking and new short positions' entry willingness. The "spike" low point of $86,963.10 on the OKX platform likely triggered some leveraged long stop-losses and passive liquidity below, improving local liquidity utilization efficiency but also exposing the fragility of the holiday order book depth. In terms of off-chain capital structure, ETF subscriptions and redemptions, along with asset portfolio rebalancing, continue to influence the relative performance of BTC and traditional risk assets. Some believe that the trend of "on-chain migration" between U.S. stocks and crypto assets makes going long on Nasdaq and shorting Coinbase a strategy reflecting capital preferences: under this logic, capital prefers to gain risk exposure through indices and high liquidity assets like Ethereum, while being more cautious towards exchange equities and individual stock betas. On the on-chain level, some capital has migrated from spot BTC to high-performance public chains like Ethereum and Solana, chasing higher volatility and returns, which has also invisibly changed BTC's weight and role in portfolios. During the holiday period, the overall order book thickness decreased, making single large orders of several million dollars sufficient to trigger price fluctuations of hundreds or even thousands of dollars in a short time, increasing the probability of "spikes" and deep penetration into local liquidity pools, significantly constraining short-term high-leverage capital and forcing it to narrow leverage multiples or shorten holding periods.

Sentiment and Expectations

From the perspective of sentiment evolution, Bitcoin has long hovered around the $90,000 mark, coupled with a market capitalization of $1.75 trillion, previously accumulating a large amount of optimistic expectations around "new highs" and "bull market continuation," with the community being quite excited at high levels. However, when the price fell from around $89,000 to just above $87,000 within 24 hours, with a decline of only about 2.08%, and with platforms like OKX recording a brief drop below $87,000, the narrative on social networks quickly shifted from "steady consolidation" to "critical support in jeopardy," with FUD beginning to spread along the paths of ETF outflows, options expiration, and liquidity exhaustion. The low liquidity environment brought about by the Christmas holiday amplified these concerns: when trading depth is insufficient to absorb medium-sized sell orders, each price pullback leaves more exaggerated shadows on the K-line, and these "technical signals" are then screenshot, amplified, and disseminated, forming a typical self-reinforcing cycle. At the official and KOL levels, exchange social accounts were busy with holiday greetings, light-hearted messaging, and product promotions, attempting to place volatility in the context of "normal market noise," while some KOLs emphasized the necessity of risk management and strategy adjustments. This "light-hearted tone" created a significant dissonance with the subjective feelings of many ordinary users who were "panicking and averaging down." From a behavioral finance perspective, in a high-level environment, investors' aversion to losses is far greater than their satisfaction with equivalent gains, and even a mere 0.07% instantaneous drop or around 2% intraday pullback can trigger excessive associations with "top reversals." Under the amplification effect of social media, this can lead to disproportionate price and position reactions.

Long and Short Logic Game

Around the critical price level of $87,000, both long and short sides have relatively clear logic. The core basis for the bulls is that, from a longer-term perspective, Bitcoin has been deeply embedded in the traditional asset allocation system through compliant vehicles like ETFs. Although short-term subscription and redemption data may fluctuate, the logic of incremental capital in the medium to long term has not been disproven; at the same time, against the backdrop of global interest rates peaking and some economies entering expectations of rate cuts, the macro liquidity center is tending towards easing, providing valuation support for high beta assets. From the bulls' perspective, the $85,000 to $90,000 range is more like a consolidation "continuation" before the start of a new trend. As long as there is no large-scale capital outflow or systemic risk, pullbacks are seen as opportunities to rebuild positions and optimize holding costs. Conversely, the bears are more concerned about the crowded long positions accumulating in the high range and the thinning order book during the holiday period: when a large number of leveraged longs stack stop-losses in a close price area, a concentrated sell-off or futures suppression during moments of weak liquidity can trigger a chain liquidation, leading to a "cascade" accelerated decline. Options expiration and potential "spikes" in this game framework serve more as technical tools: by creating significant volatility near key strike prices, they can influence some gamma hedging behaviors, amplify short-term price swings, and coordinate with futures and spot to form a defense and offense around specific price levels. The importance of $87,000 lies not only in its proximity to the lower half of the current range but also in being a dense area of multiple previous intraday lows and platform orders. If effectively broken below in a high-leverage environment, it can easily trigger a collective psychological resonance of "support being lost"; meanwhile, the bulls attempt to repeatedly buy in this area, pulling back to the mid-range, actively controlling the pace to avoid the situation evolving into a one-sided trend.

Exchanges and Ecosystem

Behind this round of fluctuations around $87,000, the competition among exchanges and public chain ecosystems is also quietly rearranging. Platforms like OKX have continuously promoted wallet integration strategies over the past year, connecting CEX trading, DeFi access, and self-custody wallets, and launching products like CeDeFi, options, contracts, and multi-chain aggregated trading, attempting to create a gap in user experience and asset coverage. At the same time, competition among major platforms in Launchpad, IEO, and on-chain new projects has become increasingly fierce: statistics show that some of the best-performing Launchpads over the past year still have ROIs of several times, with ATH ROIs exceeding 70 times at one point, while new project channels, including some CEX wallets, are few but yield outstanding results; in contrast, the average current ROI of most platforms has dropped to below 2 times, with even five new project platforms overall falling below 1, indicating that the short-term window for "lottery profits" is narrowing, and exchanges must seek new incremental capital entry points, such as multi-chain integration and BTC layer-two expansion plans. From a marketing and community operation perspective, holiday activities, AMAs, challenges, and high-frequency collaborations with KOLs can serve as "emotional dampeners" during panic periods, but they may also heighten overly optimistic expectations at the peak of bull market narratives. Historical data shows that Q4 is often a peak period for exchange marketing and product launches, accompanied by higher market activity and short-term volatility. The current round of fluctuations provides a core insight for BTC layer-two and multi-chain interoperability: only when assets can flow between different chains and platforms at low cost, high efficiency, and low slippage can the impacts of local "spikes" and liquidity vacuums be quickly hedged by a broader range of cross-chain capital, and the overall market volatility is expected to be reduced.

Future Path

Looking ahead, the $85,000 to $90,000 range remains the core framework for the short-term market. If the price can stabilize above $85,000 and the subsequent trading volume and order book depth gradually recover, it is expected to continue oscillating around $87,000–$89,000, waiting for new macro or capital catalysts; once a significant breakout above $90,000 occurs and holds during a pullback, the upper edge of the range may convert into new support, initiating a test of higher ranges. Conversely, if $85,000 is broken with volume and accompanied by concentrated liquidations of leveraged capital, it may open up space for a pullback towards lower historical support levels. The key factors influencing the switch between these scenarios can be roughly categorized into three types: first, changes in ETF net subscriptions and redemptions and institutional participation, determining whether medium to long-term capital continues to flow in or weakens marginally; second, the global macro liquidity and risk appetite tone, including interest rate expectations, stock market performance, and other external variables; third, changes in implied volatility and options position structures; once volatility rebounds from low levels, combined with a high-leverage structure, it often amplifies daily price fluctuations. For investors with lower risk appetites, a more reasonable approach is to set clear position and risk control rules at both ends of the range, such as gradually building positions above $85,000 and gradually reducing positions near $90,000, avoiding frequent chasing and cutting losses amid short-term noise; for participants with higher risk appetites, it is necessary to actively control leverage levels, pay attention to order book thickness and liquidity conditions, and appropriately reduce exposure during holidays and event-intensive periods. Regardless of the strategy adopted, for unverified bearish rumors, such as the so-called "continuous large outflows from ETFs" and "Deribit concentrated crashing," caution and independent verification should be maintained, confirming quotes and transaction conditions through multiple platforms and data sources to avoid becoming passive chips driven by emotions due to individual platforms' "spikes" or price deviations.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。