Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

Uniswap vote could soon tie UNI token value to its multibillion-dollar trading engine

CN
coindesk
Follow
3 months ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.


What to know : Uniswap governance is voting on a proposal to activate protocol fees and introduce a UNI token burn mechanism. The proposal would reduce UNI's circulating supply by 100 million tokens and align Uniswap Labs with long-term growth. Voting on the proposal runs from December 20 to December 25 and includes a plan for a 20 million UNI annual growth budget.

Uniswap governance has opened voting on a sweeping proposal that would activate protocol fees for the first time, introduce a permanent burn mechanism for its UNI token and formally align Uniswap Labs with the protocol’s long-term growth strategy.

The proposal, dubbed “UNIfication,” would flip Uniswap’s long-dormant fee switch, allowing the protocol to collect a portion of swap fees across selected v2 and v3 pools. These pools have pocketed over $700 million in the past year, data shows.

Those fees would be routed into a new on-chain mechanism designed to burn UNI tokens, directly linking protocol usage to token supply reduction.

Voting begins at 9:03 a.m. UTC on December 20, 2025, and will continue until 11:27 p.m. on December 25, 2025.

If approved, the proposal would also execute an immediate burn of 100 million UNI from the treasury — worth over $500 million at current rates — in a retroactive move intended to reflect fees that could have accrued had protocol fees been active since Uniswap’s launch.

The burn would permanently reduce UNI’s circulating supply from the current 629 million tokens to 529 million tokens.

Under the plan, Uniswap v2 pools would split fees into 0.25% for liquidity providers and 0.05% for the protocol, while v3 protocol fees would be set on a pool-by-pool basis, initially capturing between one-sixth and one-quarter of LP fees depending on the tier.

Uniswap v2 and v3 are different versions of Uniswap’s trading software that launched years apart. V2 is one simple pool per token pair with one fixed fee, while v3 are more advanced pools that let market makers choose price ranges and different fee levels.

Liquidity providers are users who supply tokens to Uniswap so others can trade, earning a share of trading fees in return.

Beyond swap fees, the proposal directs all Unichain sequencer revenue — net of data costs and Optimism’s share — into the same UNI burn system, expanding the protocol’s fee base beyond Ethereum mainnet trading.

Another central part of the proposal is structural. It shifts operational responsibility from the Uniswap Foundation to Uniswap Labs, consolidating protocol development, growth, ecosystem support and governance coordination under a single entity.

In return, Labs commits to zero fees on its interface, wallet and API products and to focusing exclusively on protocol growth rather than standalone monetization.

To fund that effort, governance would approve a 20 million UNI annual growth budget, distributed quarterly via vesting starting in 2026. The budget would be governed by a services agreement between Labs and the DAO’s legal entity, DUNI.

Meanwhile, the proposal also sketches out future upgrades, including ways to capture value from trading bots, route trades beyond Uniswap’s own pools, and boost returns for liquidity providers.

If passed, the proposal would mark Uniswap’s most significant economic shift to date, transforming UNI from a governance token into one directly tied to protocol revenue and usage.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

震荡行情滑点大?去Bybit体验极速现货撮合!
广告
|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by coindesk

5 hours ago
Here’s why bitcoin’s drop below $68,000 raises the risk of a crash under $60,000
7 hours ago
CFTC sues Illinois over state\\\'s cease-and-desist letters against prediction markets
7 hours ago
Coinbase wins initial bank regulator nod for trust charter, boosting custody push
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatarDecrypt
27 minutes ago
Naoris Launches Post-Quantum Blockchain as Bitcoin, Ethereum Devs Scramble to Face Threat
avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
58 minutes ago
Premier League’s Last Gambling Shirt Season: £140M and a UK Crackdown
avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
1 hour ago
Trump’s $1.5T Defense Budget Push, Iran Warning Send Stocks, Gold, and Bitcoin Lower
avatar
avatarDecrypt
2 hours ago
Google Researchers Reveal Every Way Hackers Can Trap, Hijack AI Agents
avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
2 hours ago
Outflows Return for Bitcoin ETFs With $174 Million Exit
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink