In the past two months, significant adjustments regarding token economics have emerged across multiple public chains and mainstream projects, becoming a core topic of concern in the market beyond price fluctuations. From total supply reductions and burn mechanisms to utility upgrades and participation incentive restructuring, these changes are fundamentally impacting token value logic, market liquidity, and investor behavior.

Several projects announced adjustments to their supply structures at the end of the year, with the most representative being projects that reduced total supply through community voting, directly decreasing future potential selling pressure. Such "permanent supply reduction" actions are often seen as measures to enhance scarcity, establishing a more solid price floor for the long term by reducing the theoretically circulating supply.

At the same time, many public chain projects continue to adopt "burn mechanisms" to lower the total circulating supply. For example, a portion of tokens is burned whenever on-chain activities occur to combat inflationary pressures. This model of "more activities, less supply" helps form a positive cycle, but it requires the ecosystem to be sufficiently active; otherwise, relying solely on burning may not sustain token value.

Overall, supply-side contraction has become a commonly adopted stabilization measure among project teams in the current market environment, but its effectiveness still depends on the sustainability of demand.

In recent years, many projects' tokens primarily served governance or incentive mining functions, lacking real-world applications, which led to prices being heavily reliant on speculative sentiment. Recent trends show that more and more teams are beginning to emphasize the binding of tokens to "user behavior," "ecosystem participation," and "tool attributes."

A typical direction is to link tokens with user loyalty systems, transaction fee discounts, and ecosystem rights, closely connecting tokens with actual use cases. The commonality of such models is that holders do not solely rely on price increases for profit but gain continuous benefits through participation in the ecosystem, thereby reducing short-term speculative behavior.

The advantage of such models lies in their ability to enhance user stickiness and strengthen internal ecosystem circulation. However, the challenge is that if the project itself lacks practical applications, even the most well-designed tokens may still face structural issues of being "unusable and sold off."

From a market performance perspective, tokens with real ecosystems and network effects have shown more robust performance during price corrections. For instance, some mainstream public chain tokens serve functions such as on-chain gas fees and ecosystem staking; their value relies not only on supply structure but also on on-chain activity—more users lead to higher token demand.

This indicates that the true support for token value is not "scarcity," but "demand." Scarcity brings an upper limit, demand determines the floor, and sustainable demand is crucial for long-term development.

Therefore, at the current market stage, a key judgment dimension for investors and project teams is: Does the token have rigid, continuous, and directly related use cases with ecosystem activities?

If the answer is not clear enough, it may be difficult for the token value to be maintained in the long term.

As the year-end approaches, multiple projects will see token releases, team allocation unlocks, or ecosystem incentive unlocks, which may increase market circulation in the short term. If the release ratio is too high or the timing is unreasonable, it can easily put pressure on prices, even offsetting originally good deflationary designs with short-term supply shocks.

Thus, the market is generally concerned about whether projects transparently display the following:

• Is the unlock timetable reasonable?
• Is the large release synchronized with ecosystem development?
• Are teams and early investors adhering to their commitments?
• Is there a risk response plan to cope with market fluctuations?

The higher the transparency, the stronger the pressure resistance; opaque projects often face significant sell-offs after unlocks, leading to community skepticism.

The current market environment is complex: macro factors are unstable, regulatory dynamics are frequent, and liquidity is tight. In this context, the quality of token economics is influencing investor judgment in unprecedented ways.

Especially with multiple projects adjusting mechanisms at year-end, 2025 will become an important year to test the effectiveness of tokenomics:

• Which projects can form a virtuous cycle through supply optimization and ecosystem development?
• Which projects rely solely on "deflationary illusions" to mask insufficient demand?
• Which tokens can truly weather the cycles?

The answers depend not only on design but also on execution and, more importantly, on the participation of real users.

For investors:

• Pay attention to total token supply, circulation, and lock-up structure.
• Check if the token has actual use cases rather than nominal functions.
• Monitor the rhythm of unlocks and potential selling pressure around year-end.
• Focus on the project's ecosystem activity rather than a single metric.

For project teams:

• Strengthen the binding of tokens to actual ecosystems and user behavior.
• Maintain transparency in supply design to avoid aggressive issuance.
• Prioritize the construction of use cases and expand on-chain activities.
• Enhance community communication to improve governance and openness.

The changes in token economics by the end of 2025 are not only technical details behind price fluctuations but also important signals of structural adjustments in the entire industry. As more projects enter the deep waters of "supply optimization + utility enhancement," token economics is transitioning from concept to true competitiveness.

Token mechanisms are no longer just packaging; they are a matter of life and death. The ability to build a healthy, transparent, and sustainable token economic system will determine whether a project can establish a foothold in future cycles.

Related: Crypto payments are set to land on PlayStation, with Sony planning to launch a stablecoin in 2026.

Original article: “Token Economics Enters Deep Waters: Analysis of Supply Contraction and Utility Restructuring Trends”

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。